It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Assad crossed many Red Lines but I aint Broadcasting our Strategy!

page: 1
21
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:28 PM
link   


This is why I voted for him. Obama broadcasted his strategy way to much. I stopped supporting Obama because he didn't do Jack hit after it was proven 100% Beyond a Reasonable doubt that Assad crossed that Red Line by using Chemical Weapons on his own people. This is 100% Obama's fault. This Syrian Refugee Crisis that is Invading Europe and America is Obama's Fault. Him and Kerry in there fantasy land with armed guards protecting them 24/7 believe Global Warming is a greater threat than terrorism. Clearly Chemical Weapons will F up the environment a whole quicker then my Gasoline Tank as Chemical Weapons gets into the soil and poisoning the wildlife.



+23 more 
posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Stevemagegod


You still think Assad used chemical weapons on his own people? hmm

cui bono?



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
a reply to: Stevemagegod


You still think Assad used chemical weapons on his own people? hmm

cui bono?


I dont know what to believe. But I do know that Broadcasting our strategy is why we haven't defeated them yet in the last 5 years.
edit on 5-4-2017 by Stevemagegod because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:34 PM
link   
Satire:



+2 more 
posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Stevemagegod

Was it Obama who drew a red line with Syria?

Back in the day when HE was working with
the Russians!


The idea of working with the Russians to pressure Assad had been discussed informally in the White House earlier, and had even come up in a conversation between Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin.


"Dont cross this line".

But then they did.

Washington Post

I also find it strange there was a reporter tweeting
24 hours beforehand about this latest attack.

"Tomorrow a media campaign will begin to cover intense
air raids on the Hama countryside and use of chlorine against civilians".

twitter.com...

It is possible this was done by Rebels?

ISIS?




edit on 5-4-2017 by burntheships because: (no reason given)


+2 more 
posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:35 PM
link   
I like the fact that Trump doesn't broadcast what he's going to do.....but I still think that I'd rather the US stay out of Syria and let it settle out first. Honestly, I wish we had never started to play World Police back in 2003, but as we know, there was something to be gained by a few.



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:37 PM
link   
By golly this is either history repeating itself or I'm having a very bad case of daja vu.


+5 more 
posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:38 PM
link   
I think assad is a rational player. Chemical attacks benefit him in no way.

Remember that ceaserfire 8 months backs with us, russia, syria being brokered. Then Obummber dropped a BIG bomb on Syrian Troops and said ooppssie. working together to fight ISIS ruined.
Were close to working together. cue chemical attack.



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:43 PM
link   
It's fairly sad that Trump has fallen for this extremely obvious deception. Unless this is an intentional move by him to placate the warmongers while planning to do nothing.

The same tired old story.

Terrorists attack poorly defended garrison. Garrison falls. Terrorists publicize their success (ignoring the rape and beheadings of course). Syrian Army counterattacks and the terrorists flee, then go crying to the SOHR propagandist in London. Shortly afterwards a chemical attack happens when the Syrians have no military reason to do so.

Another factor to consider is this chemical attack comes mere days after Trump said it was no longer a priority to remove Al-Assad and that US aid for terrorists was going to stop. Plus there's the much-publicized Islamist terror attack in St. Petersburg.

I'm afraid the timing is far too convenient for the terrorists and the pathetic westerners who support them for this to be unrelated to events that happened days prior.

Terrorists don't want to lose their aid, and the Warmongers want any excuse for war with Syria to remove Al-Assad.
edit on -050006pm4kpm by Ohanka because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Ohanka




It's fairly sad that Trump has fallen for this extremely obvious deception. Unless this is an intentional move by him to placate the warmongers while planning to do nothing.


He knows the game. He is waiting for McCain to visit Al-Nusra again and accidently drop a bomb on them.


Ron Paul saying it's pry a false flag.


+17 more 
posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Stevemagegod

Yawn.

Assad didn't attack his citizens with chemical weapons, US led forces did, as a false flag, in order to get Assad out and their puppet in.

LOL - I wrote almost the identical thing when Kerry begged the planet to deliver mega-freedoms of democracy to Assad the first time, because Kerry insisted Assad used chemical weapons.

and just like last time, all indicators point to US involvement in the use of chemical weapons.

A false flag.

Assad is not a bad person, just like Qaddafi was not a bad person, just like Saddam was not a bad person - when they are compared and weighed up against Bush, Obama, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rice, Rice, Powell, Kerry etc etc etc etc



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:47 PM
link   
Surprised at Trump I admit. I thought he knew better. Assad doing such a low value, militarily speaking that is, attack doesn't compute. Guess our economy would collapse without that pipeline through Syria.

Assad’s Death Warrant




“Secret cables and reports by the U.S., Saudi and Israeli intelligence agencies indicate that the moment Assad rejected the Qatari pipeline, military and intelligence planners quickly arrived at the consensus that fomenting a Sunni uprising in Syria to overthrow the uncooperative Bashar Assad was a feasible path to achieving the shared objective of completing the Qatar/Turkey gas link. In 2009, according to WikiLeaks, soon after Bashar Assad rejected the Qatar pipeline, the CIA began funding opposition groups in Syria.”

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Why the Arabs don’t want us in Syria,

edit on 5-4-2017 by The GUT because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
a reply to: Stevemagegod


You still think Assad used chemical weapons on his own people? hmm

cui bono?


As much as I supported (voted) for Trump I have to agree.....

Trump is sounding more and more like John McCain..



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:54 PM
link   
Satire:




posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: jellyrev
I think assad is a rational player. Chemical attacks benefit him in no way.

Remember that ceaserfire 8 months backs with us, russia, syria being brokered. Then Obummber dropped a BIG bomb on Syrian Troops and said ooppssie. working together to fight ISIS ruined.
Were close to working together. cue chemical attack.



He gains to things rebels fear him. But more important he gets the rebels to leave areas troops have to fight house ro house casualties are high. With his army if they take major losses they will flee.



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 06:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: jellyrev
I think assad is a rational player. Chemical attacks benefit him in no way.

Remember that ceaserfire 8 months backs with us, russia, syria being brokered. Then Obummber dropped a BIG bomb on Syrian Troops and said ooppssie. working together to fight ISIS ruined.
Were close to working together. cue chemical attack.



He gains to things rebels fear him. But more important he gets the rebels to leave areas troops have to fight house ro house casualties are high. With his army if they take major losses they will flee.


Why would terrorist leadership fear gas attacks? With the current global state of affairs each one makes it more and more likely western soldiers die for their cause...



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 07:00 PM
link   
a reply to: jellyrev

Bingo! This is exactly what is happening. We will never be 'allowed' to work with Syria, TPTB keep pushing for more war. Sixty people were affected by this supposed attack.....so we go in and bomb thousands. Alrighty then.



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 07:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: The GUT
Surprised at Trump I admit. I thought he knew better. Assad doing such a low value--militarily speaking that is--attack doesn't compute. Guess our economy would collapse without that pipeline through Syria.

Assad’s Death Warrant




“Secret cables and reports by the U.S., Saudi and Israeli intelligence agencies indicate that the moment Assad rejected the Qatari pipeline, military and intelligence planners quickly arrived at the consensus that fomenting a Sunni uprising in Syria to overthrow the uncooperative Bashar Assad was a feasible path to achieving the shared objective of completing the Qatar/Turkey gas link. In 2009, according to WikiLeaks, soon after Bashar Assad rejected the Qatar pipeline, the CIA began funding opposition groups in Syria.”

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Why the Arabs don’t want us in Syria,


He didn't hesitate for one second to approve the KeystoneXL why would he be any different here? Why is oil still so damn relevant *shades eyes from truck glaring through window* (it's a work truck).

I have given him enough time, I don't believe the Russian garbage but I do believe he's like everyone else to sit behind that desk.

I'm surprised Assad had held out so long even with the help of Russia. Wasn't the fall of Damascus foretold? Given the ramifications to Russia if it did, it wouldn't bode well for any of us I'm afraid.



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 07:01 PM
link   
I should think that this is not what it is claimed to be. Assad was doing far better without using chemical weapons and with Russia in support. Why, after re-claiming so much ground back over the last few months would Assad sanction a chemical weapon attack, knowing how bad this would be perceived by the world, and how the world's media would use it against him. A chemical weapon attack would go against his gains, not work for him.

This to me me based on the current evidence and also on the benefits and losses to each warring faction it would bring to bear is a 'false flag'. This does indeed look like one side sacrificing its own to bring about reputation gains for support.



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 07:03 PM
link   
I question if Assad did this, it could be a set up to make it look like he did. This definitely stinks of a setup by the rebels. I wouldn't be too fast in blaming this one on Assad.



new topics

top topics



 
21
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join