 |
reply posted on 12-2-2005 @ 03:52 PM by E_T
|
Originally posted by American Mad Man
In fact, thats why the US developed the Nuetron bomb - to take out large tank formations from Russia invading Europe without destroying infrastructure
and leaving large amounts of radiation. 
Wrong, neutron bomb is nothing more than enhanced radiation nuke which just releases bigger part of its energy in ionozing radiation than normal nukes
and destroys buildings same way like normal nukes.
And actually neutron bomb can even cause "induced" secondary radioactivity in exposed materials because of high neutron flux.
 The design objective of the tactical neutron bombs developed in the 1960s and 70s was to create a low-yield, compact weapon that produced a
lethal burst of neutrons. These neutrons can penetrate steel armor with relative ease, enabling the weapons to be effective against tanks and other
armored vehicles which are otherwise highly resistant to the effects of nuclear weapons. A flux of several thousand rems were desired so that
incapacitation of armored crews would be relatively rapid, with in several hours to a couple of days at most. In this exposure range death is
inevitable. To minimize the effects of collateral damage, the effect of thermal radiation and blast outside the neutron kill radius, it was also very
desirable to minimize the energy released in forms other than the neutron
flux.  nuclearweaponarchive.org...
 The neutron flux can induce significant amounts of short-lived secondary radioactivity in the environment in the high flux region near the
burst point. The alloy steels used in armor can develop radioactivity that is dangerous for 24-48 hours. If a tank exposed to a 1 kt neutron bomb at
690 m (the effective range for immediate crew incapacitation) is immediately occupied by a new crew, they will receive a lethal dose of radiation
within 24 hours.
At the conventional effective combat range (690 m), the blast from a 1 kt neutron bomb will destroy or damage to the point of inutility almost any
civilian building. Thus the use of neutron bombs to stop an enemy attack, which requires exploding large numbers of them to blanket the enemy forces,
would also destroy all buildings in the area.  en.wikipedia.org...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-2-2005 @ 05:47 PM by American Mad Man
|
E_T
Your links say exctly what I said.
EDIT:
BTW - I never said that NBs did not destroy anything or have any long term radiation - just that what they were designed to do.
[edit on 12-2-2005 by American Mad Man]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-2-2005 @ 12:58 AM by beyondSciFi
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-2-2005 @ 12:05 PM by Off_The_Street
|
MWM, chill; you're wasting your time. You're arguing life experiences with a seventeen-year-old kid, for crying out loud!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-2-2005 @ 02:52 PM by metalfan87
|
What do we do with the other 70% of the GDP? 825 billion on defense? Thats crazy but hey i'll vote for u for president... lol Care to run? I'm
joining the Marines at the end of 2006 and that 825 bil would be nice. lol So how bout it? Election 08' Beyondscifi for President!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-2-2005 @ 03:26 PM by beyondSciFi
|
Lol wow, even if I could run for president (I wasn't born in the U.S. so I cant run) I probably wouldn't. There is too much lying and pressure to
lie on any politician (among other things). All and all I rather not have a public life because we all have thing we want kept private. Hehe thanks
for the vote though, I hope being in the Marines goes well for you. Good luck
Besides my job saving people all over the world keeps me buzy enough.
<---
[edit on 25-2-2005 by beyondSciFi]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-2-2005 @ 06:23 PM by ILnofsot
|
France is among the most powerful military powers in the world.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2005 @ 12:00 AM by metalfan87
|
Originally posted by beyondSciFi
Lol wow, even if I could run for president (I wasn't born in the U.S. so I cant run) I probably wouldn't. There is too much lying and pressure to
lie on any politician (among other things). All and all I rather not have a public life because we all have thing we want kept private. Hehe thanks
for the vote though, I hope being in the Marines goes well for you. Good luck
Besides my job saving people all over the world keeps me buzy enough.
<---
[edit on 25-2-2005 by beyondSciFi] 
Aww poo... lol your right about the lying stuff... politicians do lie an awful lot but then again who doesn't? Can u or anyone else on here honestly
tell me they've never lied a day in there life? If so i want your autograph cause thats pretty amazing if u ask me. Thanks for the luck with the
Marines... i'll need it.. lol I'll do my best tho... later
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2005 @ 12:04 AM by metalfan87
|
Originally posted by ILnofsot
France is among the most powerful military powers in the world. 
Hey ATS! Looks like we got a comedian sweet!!!
J/k.. Don't be to offended...
I wouldn't say they're a great fighting force because I don't think they've proved themselves to be a strong military except maybe during the
French revolution which i think was a war against themselves sooo how can they not win that war???
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2005 @ 11:36 AM by vor78
|
Actually, the US takes in quite a bit less than 3.3 trillion in taxes every year. For 2005, the government anticipates about 2.053 Trillion in tax
reciepts.
Here's a summary of the US budget:
www.whitehouse.gov...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2005 @ 02:21 PM by beyondSciFi
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-2-2005 @ 10:45 AM by vor78
|
This is true, but GDP doesn't directly measure the income of a country's citizens. The most common definition of GDP is:
Consumer Spending + Investment + Net Exports + Government Spending
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-4-2006 @ 10:44 PM by shortmanx5
|
Stop talking aobut national debt, it doesnt matter when the usa has the worlds largest gold reserves and holds a lot of only countries gold.Its not
like we dont have the money, its stupid to pay cash when you can take out a loan.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-4-2006 @ 09:26 PM by Omniscient
|
Originally posted by Murcielago
But congress relizes that its to high and is going to cut the budget, I garantee next year (FY06) that it will be under 420 billion, probably around
3 to 6 billion less. 
I wouldn't count on it; they always say they are going to cut back and spend less, but considering that they are preparing the raise the 9.344
trillion dollar government debt limit because they are nearing it, I wouldn't count on any cuts on military expenses; especially in the heat of this
huge 'war'.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |