This is ridiculous. I'm stunned by the amount of people who swallow this hoax (probably made by a border-line individual) and fall into the
alchemy/esoterism #, with the speech tone of very serious scientific nerds.
So, I'm gonna explore the subject methodically. I'm not english so please accept my apologies for any "strange" expressions.
A) THE "IMPRESSIVE" AMOUNT OF TEXT / ARGUMENT OF AUTHORITY :
I've read a few people saying that everybody mocking the richness of what is stacked in this room is unable to see "the deepness and the
intellectual power that it implies"
. But you miss these points :
Nobody has read anything (until a few translation has been released). And you started to flamme BEFORE anything has been released. So,
being so excited by just a few A4 papers glued on the walls is just kid reaction.
The amount of data is not impressive : the texts written on the walls, compiled into a book, would only stand... in a little
It's not even the quantity of data usually used in doctoral thesis. Beside, I'm a self-taugh philosopher (yeah, call me pretentious), I've been
thinking since the age of 2 (yeah, call me liar), socially excluded all my life and leaving alone (yeah, call me freak) and since the last 10 years
I'm stuck in my appartment I've been writing and writing, and I can say that I have at least 100 times what's on the walls here. So, I can understand
that for total noobs like you guys it's shocking, but wake up : when we have something in mind, it can take years and paper reams (or tens of
The books numbered with roman digits have not been opened ! We don't know if this is blank.
Even if full of text, those encoded texts can be just pure bull#s.
A5 : And here is the central argument : what has been released (some wall texts translation) is not so revolutionary. (I will explain this in the
All these texts could have been made by a schizophrenic individual. Ever heard of logorrhea ? Even the quite egocentric/megalomaniac
display is a big element in this hypothesis, not mentioning the handwritting schoolish style and the will to "imitate" (or not) what schizophrenic
people do. Yeah, the egocentric aspect could not be one, if the content is valuable ; it could be someone who really has discovered a great thought
and has something to say to humanity, and who has chosen to make an impressive art installation to present it. But you should take into account the A5
argument and wait the B) chapter. Moreover, it's not a good shot to confuse a philosophical work and a piece of art like this, making people to be
And should I mention the fact that society systematically bully people who tends to think they understand things that others don't ? Where
did you see that you guys, were okay to listen people who has such philosophical and revolutionary ideas about life and consciousness ? Don't you
remember how sarcastic and merciless you are when someone contradict you in the school court, and have a rude opinion of society ? Yeah, try me and
make me believe that you are all willing to read something so revolutionnary. I bet you're just esoterical fools who want to listen what they want to
hear, like atoms resonance and chakras
But certainly not listening a guy who think he has a really different and precious mind structure. How
could you accept that ? I personnally think I'm such a guy, and clearly I'm excluded from society and forced to write in loneliness, with no garantee
of being read. That's not because I would glue some A4 papers on the wall that it would change anything.
A8 : And I'm sure you will mock the fact that I could be a guy that has understood something so important that it could change the way you think and
act. You wanna bet ? Ok, just a few words of my thoughts :
- At the age of 5 I've seen things (and all during my life too), that prove you are unconscious, retarded, loving absurdity, and driven by the sexual
pole of your psyche. You bully people who have superior intellect, don't see good nor evil, use domination on language. I theorized (yeah, in my
writings/work) that the most aggressive individual force everybody to abandon reasoning, to "accept", and that everybody around are okay, become
hypocrit, and transfer their frustration on the most intellectual individual who try to critisize what they see. Especially when those intellectuals
defend themselves against attacks, because it's the best moment for you to shine.
- When I saw in the first years some mistakes in your behavior, or in your talks, I cannot explain to you, due to your aggressive response and
unability to listen what you don't want to hear.
- I tried to explain things, but you used (and always used all during these years) paradoxes to counter reflections that could elevate your mind to
the point that you see you're saying bull#s. When I said for example "you're stupid, you're saying this and that and it is false because of this
, you use reversion technics like "how can you know that you know" wich are paradoxes that force mind to self-destruct instead of
listening arguments (ad-hominem attacks).In short, pretention is the center of your technics. You never watch yourself in this process.
- You reverse situations : if I say "You are A because of B and C", you say "How can you say we are A ??? It's mean.", and of course you try to make
me "understand" that I'm A. (contradiction, because you denigrated the value of saying that someone could be A)
- When the moral aspect of logic comes (about what you do, what you say, etc), you always respond very aggressively by trying to destroy the opponent
by saying he's pretentious to think that he's better than others, and you interrupt him and deploy fallacious arguments to defend the fact that nobody
is good or bad.
I stop here this begining of description (in english it's very hard for me, not the same mind pathways).
I could continue for hours in this psychosocial exploration. I've already made it :
- You reject people that have intellect, by making them to be seen as "immature", "childish".
- This is not only for controlling them and avoiding yourself to be critisized/unmasked, but also to access to sexuality.
- You use sexuality as a method to make victims to suffer. For you, your sexuality is "a proof" that you are something or have done something, and
that the "so-called victims" (sic) are just unable to do it. But you don't see how your manipulation made them alone.
- Social exclusion is made on it.
- There is a link between miror, ego, violence, uncomprehension.
And some metalogical/metaphysical discovering :
- The Unvierse is made by a duality. There is two different things/structures, with antagonistic nature and properties.
- This duality shape the physical world and the consciousness, from the tiniest parts (atoms, sub-particles, etc)
to the largest (bodies, objects). The brain itself is shape by the duality, and the phenomenons inside it too.
- Physical laws (energy) and thoughts...
And some applications of cosmological discoveries in the psychosocial domain :
- Relationship between consciousness and unconsciousness. Gestalt theory.
- Collective unconsciousness.
I can't even summarize my philosophical structure : it would take pages and pages to introduce.
edit on 17-4-2017 by PlugYourBrane because: (no