It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Story

page: 9
115
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Tempter

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Tempter
I see this story is exploding. It's everywhere now.

Can't hide any longer.

I wonder if Rice will be accidented soon?

Plenty are in denial.


Yoohoo! Ooobaaamaaa! Enjoying your "vacation"?

Did you hear any of the details of that 'vacation'?
They are interesting.
edit on b000000302017-04-04T12:32:20-05:0012America/ChicagoTue, 04 Apr 2017 12:32:20 -05001200000017 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)



+4 more 
posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:30 PM
link   
1) Rice denies knowing anything at all regarding the unmasking.

2) Story breaks implicating her as the actual requestor to unmask.

3) Rice, "Yeah, so what?"

4) Gryphon66 continues to defend.


That about sum it up?



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth

Well, if it's not illegal, and it's part of her job, what's wrong with it?

I see you're walking back now ...

No one looks stupid except well, folks who were crowing a minute ago about "Trump was right"

I tried to get you to think about it before you did it.

Your posts don't have a very high disinfo worth these days; they're sloppy and way off base.

Awww...


Lol, walking back?

My statement remains the same. Rice has admitted to requesting the unmasking of names in the Trump team.
I understand your need to save face (you have a lot of that to do) by adding the illegal element to the argument. But that is your addition.

So, like I said, the Obama administration has now been proven to have been spying on Trump and his campaign. That was Trump's claim and he was spot on. Your shifting of the claim and the argument is transparent. You really should learn to take your losses a bit more gracefully


You have the video.

CIte the time stamp in which she admitted to requesting the unmasking of names in the Trump Team.

That's all you have to do.

The video is above.

Put up or shut up.


I'll help.
Watch from 3:00.
Clear admission that seems to have embarrassed our dear liberal friends to the point where they have switched back into full on deny reality mode.


I've watched the whole thing several times now.

CIte the time stamp when she says that she requested unmasking of Trump, the Trump team, or anyone assocaited with Trump.

Just cite the exact time that she does that.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Mike.Ockizard

... and, right on time it's the "Hillary Clinton Deflection" everyone!

The video we're discussing is above. Perhaps. You'll watch it, first hand, and let us know where Ms. Rice confesses.

Nobody else here, suddenly, seems capable of anything except wild BS deflection.


Who's deflecting. I'm attacking CNN's credibility. Nice dodge.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: digital01anarchy

I'm not out of my depth on anything.

I know BS when I see it.

You seem to post it.

The dossier was one of 20 or so items that you mentioned. Are you sure it all came from 4Chan?

Care to prove that, with you know, evidence?


archive.4plebs.org...

Anything else?
Also i never stated everything came from 4chan only peegate if you actually look at my post I said that everything else in the report is suspect because of 4chan document being in it



edit on 4-4-2017 by digital01anarchy because: (no reason given)

edit on 4-4-2017 by digital01anarchy because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Tempter
1) Rice denies knowing anything at all regarding the unmasking.

2) Story breaks implicating her as the actual requestor to unmask.

3) Rice, "Yeah, so what?"

4) Gryphon66 continues to defend.


That about sum it up?


/sigh

She stated in a previous interview that she didn't know anything about illegal unmasking.

She said in this interview that there was no illegal unmasking.

Watch the video and give us the time stamp that says otherwise.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Tempter

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Tempter
I see this story is exploding. It's everywhere now.

Can't hide any longer.

I wonder if Rice will be accidented soon?

Plenty are in denial.


Yoohoo! Ooobaaamaaa! Enjoying your "vacation"?

Did you here any of the details of that 'vacation'?
They are interesting.


Do you mean the month-long, all male getaway with 50 other men, at Marlon Brando's mansion in Tahiti?



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Tempter
1) Rice denies knowing anything at all regarding the unmasking.

2) Story breaks implicating her as the actual requestor to unmask.

3) Rice, "Yeah, so what?"

4) Gryphon66 continues to defend.


That about sum it up?


/sigh

She stated in a previous interview that she didn't know anything about illegal unmasking.

She said in this interview that there was no illegal unmasking.

Watch the video and give us the time stamp that says otherwise.


No, I don't think I will.

I'm sure Senators request hearings for nothing all the time. Enjoy defending this.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Wait didn't you bring an unsourced report from anonymous insiders to us last night in a thread you authored and wanted us to listen to? You have got to be kidding me right now...I'm not sure who has a worse bias you or CNN.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Gryphon66

LOL

starting at 1:20 she actually says she needed to see the names on intel reports.

she was blinking like crazy.

that's enough for me.



She's blinking?

Damn her eyes.


Are you unaware of the connection?


The "connection" between what?

Blinking and dry eyes?

Why don't you reveal "the connection" to us Butch.

Google search 'nonverbal indications of lying'.
If I give you a link, it won't be good enough anyway. You will just scream 'Fake news'.
Here... anyway:
Stanford Grafuate School of Business


Dude, you're pushing bunk ... NLP based bunk.

Don't take my word for it ... listen to the FBI:




Despite the popular appeal of body language, no study has uncovered any single behavior that accurately reflects whether a person is lying. It seems that for every study that finds an increase in a particular behavior—eye contact, illustrators, or gestures—another reports a decrease in the same activity.

This is due at least in part to the fact that people’s responses vary based on the kind of lie, time to prepare, interviewer’s strategy, and liar’s level of confidence.[3] Any time an investigator misjudges an innocent subject’s behavior, there is the risk of a double injustice—an innocent person being subjected to the scrutiny of further investigation, while the actual offender remains free to commit additional crimes.


FBI Website

Google "NLP discredited" for more modern info.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Tempter
1) Rice denies knowing anything at all regarding the unmasking.

2) Story breaks implicating her as the actual requestor to unmask.

3) Rice, "Yeah, so what?"

4) Gryphon66 continues to defend.


That about sum it up?


Good summary



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Tempter

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Tempter
I see this story is exploding. It's everywhere now.

Can't hide any longer.

I wonder if Rice will be accidented soon?

Plenty are in denial.


Yoohoo! Ooobaaamaaa! Enjoying your "vacation"?

Did you here any of the details of that 'vacation'?
They are interesting.


Do you mean the month-long, all male getaway with 50 other men, at Marlon Brando's mansion in Tahiti?

Yep.
All male.
If Trump did it.... he'd be having a a misogynist jamboree.
But since it is Obama..... it is clearly something else.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: Gryphon66

Wait didn't you bring an unsourced report from anonymous insiders to us last night in a thread you authored and wanted us to listen to? You have got to be kidding me right now...I'm not sure who has a worse bias you or CNN.


I did bring a news story from the Washington Post that cited an unnamed source.

And what happened after that ... some of the same folks in this thread stated that unnamed sources are fake news.

Is hypocrisy really that hard to understand?



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: Gryphon66

Wait didn't you bring an unsourced report from anonymous insiders to us last night in a thread you authored and wanted us to listen to? You have got to be kidding me right now...I'm not sure who has a worse bias you or CNN.


I did bring a news story from the Washington Post that cited an unnamed source.

And what happened after that ... some of the same folks in this thread stated that unnamed sources are fake news.

Is hypocrisy really that hard to understand?


Yes, you do push a lot of fake news. Thanks for admitting it.
Here we have Rice admitting she requested unmasking, so much more reliable than your propaganda.




posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:38 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Come on ... give us the exact time stamp in the video that you claim reveals Rice admitting that she requested unmasking on Trump assocaites.

Give it to us. Prove that I'm lying when I state clearly that she does no such thing.

It's EASY ... just cite the time stamp.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:39 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

More BS about me.

More hypocrisy about "fake news" and "Unnamed sources"

Give us the timestamp int he Rice interview "UK" ...

You're' the only one proven to be lying here today so far.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Here's the interview in question;



Please anyone on the disinfo team ... give us the time notation where she "confesses" please?

Thanks.


Never claimed she lied in THIS interview but they did not ask the right questions. She say under certain circumstances. Yet the information coming out suggests that the conversations were benign and had nothing to do with Russia. On top of that, the way they figured out it was her was reportedly cross referencing dates of leaks with the dates sh requested unmasking. Circumstantial? Yes. Building blocks to a bigger case? Potentially. And then there's the prior interview where she was asked about eavesdropping and she played Colnel Klink from Hogans Heroes... "I know nothing!"



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Tempter
1) Rice denies knowing anything at all regarding the unmasking.

2) Story breaks implicating her as the actual requestor to unmask.

3) Rice, "Yeah, so what?"

4) Gryphon66 continues to defend.


That about sum it up?


Yepper, lock, stock and barrel.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:39 PM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

Did you do a little research?

Did you find out that there's no NLP witchcraft that lets you decide if someone is lying?

Will you admit it when you do?



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 12:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Gryphon66

LOL

starting at 1:20 she actually says she needed to see the names on intel reports.

she was blinking like crazy.

that's enough for me.



She's blinking?

Damn her eyes.


Are you unaware of the connection?


The "connection" between what?

Blinking and dry eyes?

Why don't you reveal "the connection" to us Butch.

Google search 'nonverbal indications of lying'.
If I give you a link, it won't be good enough anyway. You will just scream 'Fake news'.
Here... anyway:
Stanford Grafuate School of Business


Dude, you're pushing bunk ... NLP based bunk.

Don't take my word for it ... listen to the FBI:




Despite the popular appeal of body language, no study has uncovered any single behavior that accurately reflects whether a person is lying. It seems that for every study that finds an increase in a particular behavior—eye contact, illustrators, or gestures—another reports a decrease in the same activity.

This is due at least in part to the fact that people’s responses vary based on the kind of lie, time to prepare, interviewer’s strategy, and liar’s level of confidence.[3] Any time an investigator misjudges an innocent subject’s behavior, there is the risk of a double injustice—an innocent person being subjected to the scrutiny of further investigation, while the actual offender remains free to commit additional crimes.


FBI Website

Google "NLP discredited" for more modern info.

I already read the FBI page on nonverbal indications.
They cite much smaller signs.... such as a twitch, and microexpressions.
FBI



new topics

top topics



 
115
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join