It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Story

page: 5
115
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: Konduit
Seriously, how stupidly partisan must CNN be to put journalists on TV to tell people that their going to completely ignore one of the biggest breaking political stories because of an excuse that amounts to nothing more than "because we don't like it".

Every network has political hacks... but Certainly Not News seems to take the trophy, no contest.


No doubt. It reminds me of the WikiLeaks last year. Who could deny the MSM are all pure tabloid material. So then came that endless stream of hot & heavy political content for them to run wild with, like nothing before in human history in this tabloid MSM context, and to avoid the discussion they did nonstop backflips thru burning hoops while hoolahooping, day after day after day after day.


edit on 4-4-2017 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: RickinVa

CNN, Counterfeit News Network!


Globalists are in full Damage Control.


The veil has been lifted and the masses are still asleep........



geez...as always with you...over the top...Susan Rice had the authority to do what she did, as any of the previous NSA directors had....but, since she was a democrat...FIRE AND BRIMSTONE must rain down...no veil has been lifted and the globalists (whoever you think those are) are not in damage control....


Well now, except for this



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: FauxMulder

You have absolutely no idea what a counter Intel project is.

It has not been a long investigation.


Supposedly the Obama administration was investigating Trump since spring 2015. Almost 2 years inst a long time?

With all the leaks and BS from the media there still isn't any evidence.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:16 AM
link   
The cats out of the bag now.Swamp Libs going down like the Titanic



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: StoutBroux

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: RickinVa

CNN, Counterfeit News Network!


Globalists are in full Damage Control.


The veil has been lifted and the masses are still asleep........



geez...as always with you...over the top...Susan Rice had the authority to do what she did, as any of the previous NSA directors had....but, since she was a democrat...FIRE AND BRIMSTONE must rain down...no veil has been lifted and the globalists (whoever you think those are) are not in damage control....


Well now, except for this


She has now admitted she did it. You can not believe anything a liberal democrat says as evidenced by the video from two weeks ago.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:17 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Is any of this classified? There is also no need to tell the press the truth in counter intel investigations.

Serious guys your clueless how these type of things go down.

Someone, probably not Obama but he could have done wrong as well, is purposely sabotaging the agencies investigation by leaking the details.

It benefits the people being investigated the most, if we are talking about what nobody in any party disputes which is the counter intel investigation into Russia's plot in the elections. Trump is part of the investigation at the basis because Russia wanted him elected, see his views on NATO, EU etc...

On the other level he hired guys who are filthy as well..



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
Now CNN is trying to debunk the story they refused to cover!






..and now Rice has admitted it, CNN look even more stupid (if that is possible)



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: theantediluvian

If Rice was acting legally why did she lie days ago
and claim she knew nothing about this?



Why did Flynn lie about his communication with Russian officials? Why did Hope Hicks lie repeatedly about communications between Trump campaign staff and Russian officials? Conway? Spicer? Why did Nunes lie about the source of the "reports?" Why did Donald Trump lie about... who can even keep track anymore?

You're saying that Susan Rice lied about unmasking based on dubious "reporting" from among others, Cernovich the GamerGate Twitter Troll, a Daily Caller article that uses a discredited GOP shill with a history of lying as a source and a what? A Fox News article with an unnamed source.

We don't know if Susan Rice lied or not but it's well known to everyone that Flynn lied — or that the administration lied about his lying — you take your pick.

Why is it that Trumpkins have no standards? You claim Rice lied and that's proof of her guilt. You know for a fact that Flynn lied (according to Dear Leader and friends) and yet not only aren't you ranting about how that's proof of his guilt, you refuse to acknowledge that his lying should make anyone the least bit suspicious.

Yikes.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: digital01anarchy
Lets throw out some facts here for the dems.
Fisa's docs exist
Incidental collection on trump exist
Unmasking and leaking the name of a trump appointee exist
Former Obama DoD Deputy Evelyn Farkas reveals White House gathered intel on Trump campaign staff = video proof "admitted it on air"
Nunes had to access information at white house due to being stonewalled by IC.
Obama before his term ended allowed intel to be shared across multiple foriegn IC communities.
Foriegn intelligence report aimed at trump with fake intel "pee-gate"

Russian hacked the dnc = false
Russians hacked podesta= false
Russians hacked and supplied information to wikileaks = false




Prove that FISA warrants exist, and that they were illegitimately obtained.

Incidental data collection exists on Trump. Yes it does. (He was the President-Elect you know, foreigners were talking about him.

Unmasking and leaking of Flynn exists: Yep, do you know who did it?

Farkas said that EXISTING intelligence was sustained so that it wouldn't "go away" under Trump. So?

Nunes had information from the White House that he viewed at the White House and ran back to the White House to tell the President. Amazing political theatre.

Obama did allow information sharing with an EO. Trump hasn't killed that one ... wonder why?

The Trump dossier keeps being substantiated. Calling it fake doesn't make it so.

Russia hacked the DNC ... proven and stated by Comey and the Senate Intelligence Committtee.

Etc. etc.

I'm not a Democrat anymore ... but you should really get your facts correct if you're going to try to help someone.

You got one right out of 20 ... not very good odds.


Thanks for confriming basically everything i wrote! Lol you really showed me

Lol at this quote

The Trump dossier keeps being substantiated. Calling it fake doesn't make it so.

Really the trump dossier had 4chan fan fiction in it about trump getting russian hookers in anime pajamas to pee on the bed obama slept on! It is such a joke the IC backed far away from it when it came out like the dossier was radioactive! But i must say it takes a special kind of democrat or non democrat to be a peegater which makes the birther movement look down right intelligent in comparison.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:21 AM
link   
a reply to: FauxMulder

There isn't any evidence?

That is a joke. There isn't a hearing man.

For all you know this all fake and the agencies are trying to make the players expose themselves.

Get a clue and read how the stuff works.

They can literally lie to the press. The charges the fbi is investigating for Russia, they are literally the most serious kind the government explores. Leaving trump out of it even.

It took 1 and a half years to take Nixon down. Most of the time their were players who knew and had to act a certain way to keep the counter spying producing evidence.

The worst thing in the world would be to accuse a foreign power formally, bring up charges and botch the whole trial.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:22 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Just for S&G .. where did Rice say that she unmasked anything?

Anything at all?



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: theantediluvian

If Rice was acting legally why did she lie days ago
and claim she knew nothing about this?



Why did Flynn lie about his communication with Russian officials? Why did Hope Hicks lie repeatedly about communications between Trump campaign staff and Russian officials? Conway? Spicer? Why did Nunes lie about the source of the "reports?" Why did Donald Trump lie about... who can even keep track anymore?

You're saying that Susan Rice lied about unmasking based on dubious "reporting" from among others, Cernovich the GamerGate Twitter Troll, a Daily Caller article that uses a discredited GOP shill with a history of lying as a source and a what? A Fox News article with an unnamed source.

We don't know if Susan Rice lied or not but it's well known to everyone that Flynn lied — or that the administration lied about his lying — you take your pick.

Why is it that Trumpkins have no standards? You claim Rice lied and that's proof of her guilt. You know for a fact that Flynn lied (according to Dear Leader and friends) and yet not only aren't you ranting about how that's proof of his guilt, you refuse to acknowledge that his lying should make anyone the least bit suspicious.

Yikes.


You didn't answer why Rice LIED about requesting the unmasking of Trump and his team.
What's the matter, don't like judging democrats? Where's your thread about Rice lying?

Yikes.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:23 AM
link   
a reply to: digital01anarchy

You got one thing right.

Well, maybe one-and-a-half.

Sorry to spoil your big reveal, but it's full of BS.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:24 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Was it classified info part of a counter Intel investigation....


+1 more 
posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: Konduit
Seriously, how stupidly partisan must CNN be to put journalists on TV to tell people that their going to completely ignore one of the biggest breaking political stories because of an excuse that amounts to nothing more than "because we don't like it".

Every network has political hacks... but Certainly Not News seems to take the trophy, no contest.


No doubt. It reminds me of the WikiLeaks last year. Who could deny the MSM are all pure tabloid material. So then came that endless stream of hot & heavy political content for them to run wild with, like nothing before in human history in this tabloid MSM context, and to avoid the discussion they did nonstop backflips thru burning hoops while hoolahooping, day after day after day after day.



They're still in shock. They still don't get it.





posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:25 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Wow, you're in desperation mode ... this must be disinfo top priority ...

You've just said Rice admitted she unmasked intel. Can you cite that?


+1 more 
posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth

Just for S&G .. where did Rice say that she unmasked anything?

Anything at all?


Just heard live that she has released a statement and - i am sure it will hot the web soon

By the way, she requested the unmasking. She didn't do it herself. I know you libs are trying desperately to play semantics to try and cover how wrong you were, but it's over. Your argument that Trump lied is in shreds.

Lick your wounds and move on.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: FauxMulder

There isn't any evidence?

That is a joke.


Oh yea? You must be the only one with knowledge of this evidence. Can you prove it exist? I'll wait.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:26 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

I am not a lib, more a Ron Paul guy...but the old crime is leaking info she wasn't supposed to.



posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 11:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Konduit

Ah ... memes.

When in doubt, post something completely irrelevant.

Two facts I want you to consider and maybe it will calm you down.

1. Did Susan Rice have the clearance to see unmasked intel?

And

2. Is there any credible evidence that Susan Rice leaked anything, unlawfully unmasked anything, or any of the other BS being spewed here?



new topics

top topics



 
115
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join