It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: TinfoilTP
What about Ms. Yvette Falarca...who orchestrated the USC Berkeley riots, that resulted in property destruction and injuries?
REF: www.abovetopsecret.com...
Should she be sued for "inciting violence"?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Gryphon66
Oh boy...one of those "so-called" judges, who also happens to be an IDIOT. If saying "Get them out of here" can get you sued, imagine the precedent that would set!
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Lol, Obama appointed, that's all anyone needs to know.
Really? So nothing about the legal standing of the case, or precedent or anything?
Perhaps you should say that's all a Trump supporter needs to know? LOL
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Lol, Obama appointed, that's all anyone needs to know.
Really? So nothing about the legal standing of the case, or precedent or anything?
Perhaps you should say that's all a Trump supporter needs to know? LOL
There IS no legal standing...
Another frivolous lawsuit
Hope it is a "loser pays" state
Hill-Freakin Hillarious
Carry on with the humor
I LIKE IT...
originally posted by: mkultra11
It must be nice suing people who identify themselves and take responsibility instead of masked anarchists and mobs of angry leftists.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Gryphon66
What do you say should be done to MoveOn.org, the Hillary Campaign, Soros, etc, for the Chicago riot?
In case you forgot how that got started:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: Gryphon66
So asking security to remove someone can lead to you being sued? Wow that cant hold up in any court because they leads into problems even talking to police. People who even report a crime could be held liable for actions of others.
The folks that were directed to remove the protesters were not security, they were audience members, according to the Fox News report. That seems to be part of the problem; perhaps professional security wouldn't have roughed them up or used racial slurs in their removal?
No he had security at each of his rallies most of the time it was the police. He never asked the audience to remove protesters that would just be silly since they wouldn't do it anyway. they would just wait for security as to the individuals that attacked them that's simple its assault take them to court. But in no way is someone else responsible for decisions they make. Or the assaults did no damage to them physically so going after the person doesn't get as much money????
originally posted by: LoneWrecche
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Freedom of speech can not be used to cause direct harm to others.
Hrm, and yet people were told that the violent left wing protests were a direct result of Trump speaking. That it was his fault the violence erupted caused by maniacs who didn't want him to speak.
Ahhh the bitter irony, tastes like tears.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Lol, Obama appointed, that's all anyone needs to know.
Really? So nothing about the legal standing of the case, or precedent or anything?
Perhaps you should say that's all a Trump supporter needs to know? LOL
When a gangster thugs momma can stand on the hood of a car in the midst of a BLM riot mob and scream burn this b#@$#@# down!! to urge the arsonists on and nothing is done about it, yeah this is frivolous politics with an Obama appointed Judge yet again.
originally posted by: DAVID64
Oh please...Get off that high horse. You're showing the Liberal double standard. Again. The SJWs can rip a campus apart or assault people and you're fine with it. Let a Trump supporter step one toe over the line and the Left is ready to hang them. When Trump supporters were spit on or assaulted, did you condemn those who did it?
When campuses were trashed and burned, did you condemn that?
Did you write long posts about the violence and that those who did it should be sued or in jail?
A quick look through your thread history tells me the answer to that. You're perfectly fine with it, as long as it pushes your agenda.
I've said it before and it still applies : " Liberals. If it weren't for double standards, you'd have none at all".
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Gryphon66
Trump incited violence against people from his podium.
If that is the case the standard of right to refuse service goes out the window.
If someone is robbing you but also buying a candy bar you MUST accommodate them.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: VengefulGhost
Doesnt matter which side theyre on . If their speach incites /causes violence throw their asses under the jail for the next 20 years .
Maybe then theyll learn theres civilised ways to do things without inciting / resorting to violence .
Sounds civilized.
Sounds civilized to stand up against violence used for political means?
I agree. Wherever and whenever it is found. Violence is not a political tool in our country.
I just checked, but somehow you completely missed all those opportunities to OP threads shouting down all the violence used by the left the past year.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Here's a refresher course for you:
Social Justice Assault Warriors TV Marathon!
Although it sure was interesting how when the Veritas tapes showing Hillary's campaigners out actively inciting riots, you didn't seem to apply your new code therein. Good to see you turning over a new leaf.
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Gryphon66
Oh boy...one of those "so-called" judges, who also happens to be an IDIOT. If saying "Get them out of here" can get you sued, imagine the precedent that would set!
"So-called Judge" LOLOL.
The Trumpets sink ever deeper into denial by the day.