It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You are correct that false stories can hurt with the study of UFO's. I think information being kept from us would be worse than a false source. We will be able to figure out if a source is false or not. The only problem is that we don't know what the truth is so who is going to be the one to tell us a source is false? Sometimes the most outlandish things are the truth. It's just dangerous to start the automatic deleting of articles from any given source.
I don't see why Indigo_Child, or anyone else, should be the autority on what's a good source and what isn't. So do you wanna tell me what a good source is for legit UFO news is??? HAHAHAHA, I guess your take on what UFO sources are true should be listened to and not others.
It's sad how conrtol is so desired by many.
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
For those of you condemning my suggestion, did you overlook, that I also offered an alternative of non-deletion.
One of the sub-sections of the Terms and conditions is
1. Thou shalt not post false information(sensationalized)
So does this qualify as false information, or did America really go to the moon in 1869?
the interest of serious and intelligent discussion(and terms and conditions) delete them.
I personally resent these tabloid stories because they make a mockery of ufo researchers
No one is asking for control of information.
All that I am saying is that Indiadaily is providing false-information and it is obvious
it is all false information and therefore in accordance with terms and conditions, the information should not be allowed
or a separate humour thread should be created for these stories for people to entertain themselves with.
and some credible and informative sites like ufocasebook.com are referencing them.
. Just saying, "sources say" is not the way to prove something.
Most of us were able to tell that the India Daily thing was junk from the first moment we saw it.
The articles in the India Daily did not corroberate events and sources. Just saying, "sources say" is not the way to prove something.
I think that we are all able to defend our minds from sources that may prove to be false.