It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FBI Publishes 9-11 Pentagon Attack Photos on 3-23-17... With Faces Blacked Out

page: 12
72
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 04:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: M4ngo

They did exit out the other side. There are several videos taken of the second impact that clearly show the fireball and debris coming out the building, and several large pieces of debris found on the opposite side from the impact.

Flight 77 did the same thing. It exploded on impact and debris caused the exit holes on the far side.


Debris caused the round holes on the far side of the second section? What kind of debris? How did the jet fuel not cause the same, or even remotely close, conditions that it did with WTC1 and WTC2? How did the debris not cause similar conditions like at WTC7, which was hit with debris?




posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye

You may want to see the video, but, you do not have a right to it...pending a judge's ruling of course. But, it does not matter, every relevant video is public domain now.




















EDIT...well apparently something is going on with ATS and YouTube. But, go to YouTube look for user cjnewson88 you will find plenty of the "FBI confiscated" videos.

edit on 1-4-2017 by cardinalfan0596 because: YouTube having issues



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: M4ngo

Yes. A large section of WTC 1 collapsed, falling tree style, into WTC 7



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 04:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: M4ngo

The planes and fire. Building 7 had almost one entire side ripped open by falling debris, and no water to fight the fires because of the collapse of 1 and 2.



PART 1: NIST and Popular Mechanics Fabricate Myth of WTC 7's "Scooped-Out" 10 Stories

www1.ae911truth.org...



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 04:57 PM
link   
a reply to: M4ngo

Most likely the nose landing gear and pieces of the forward avionics bay.

Because the Pentagon was made out of completely different materials that have totally different properties in heat.

Building 7 was damaged and the fire started because of debris falling from the top of building 1. What conditions even remotely similar existed at the Pentagon?



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 04:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: M4ngo

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: M4ngo

Lets see....WTC 1 and 2 were hit by airliners and WTC 7, had its "big brother" WTC 1 collapse into it.....


WTC1 collapsed into WTC7?
It was damaged by the collapse, yes.

www.911myths.com...



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 04:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: MotherMayEye

You may want to see the video, but, you do not have a right to it...pending a judge's ruling of course. But, it does not matter, every relevant video is public domain now.



Neat-o. If they don't want to show the evidence, then they haven't proven their case. I am ok with that. I've already decided the federal government is likely lying and hiding evidence.

So, just get over it. There's too much reasonable doubt about the OS -- no one should be expected to believe the a**hole, lying, criminal federal government. There are many other plausible alternative theories. Have they been proven? No, but the burden of proof is not on Truthers presenting alternative theories. It 's on those pushing the official story.

If you don't think the American public deserves to see conclusive evidence, then quit your whining about our reasonable doubts about the OS.

It's as simple as that.

Prove your case beyond a reasonable doubt or STFU about it.



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 04:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: M4ngo

Yes. A large section of WTC 1 collapsed, falling tree style, into WTC 7


How is that I can actually watch videos of WTC7 collapsing into itself and not see WTC1 collapsing into it?
Can you provide the videos that back up your claim?
edit on 1-4-2017 by M4ngo because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 05:06 PM
link   
a reply to: M4ngo





That looks like a significant amount of damage to me.



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 05:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee

It was damaged by the collapse, yes.

www.911myths.com...



PART 1: NIST and Popular Mechanics Fabricate Myth of WTC 7's "Scooped-Out" 10 Stories

www1.ae911truth.org...



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 05:07 PM
link   
a reply to: M4ngo

Because it was debris from WTC 1 not the entire building. There was debris going everywhere that day and not every piece was caught on video until it landed.



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 05:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Significant? As in comparison to what? Looks like the Pentagon received a significant amount of more damage to me, and sections of the Pentagon were saturated with jet fuel too, rememeber? Was WTC7 saturated with jet fuel also?
edit on 1-4-2017 by M4ngo because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 05:10 PM
link   
a reply to: M4ngo

And it collapsed around the impact area too. Add in the fire that burned out of control for hours to the major damage, and WTC 7 was going to collapse.



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 05:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: M4ngo

Because it was debris from WTC 1 not the entire building. There was debris going everywhere that day and not every piece was caught on video until it landed.


What source do you use to come to this conclusion about WTC7?



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 05:12 PM
link   
a reply to: M4ngo

Did you bother to actually read about any of this? WTC 7 had over 40,000 gallons of diesel fuel in five tanks inside it.



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 05:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: M4ngo

WTC 1, 2, and 7 collapsed from severe structural damage and fire. Why is it that folks that believe in the conspiracy theories always forget that......



LOL I see that your Forgetting
that The World Trade center 1 n 2 were Designed to Hold up after a Airliner 707 hit it !

How would I know ? hmm

Beacuse I Know Personaly some of the Iron Workers that Built Them !

Living in my Area on Akwesasne/ St Regis / Mohawk Nation Reservation.

if you need a visual

here ya go .

WTC Towers Designed to Withstand Impact of Loaded Boeing 707
www.youtube.com...



WTC Designed to Withstand Airliner Jet Impacts!
www.youtube.com...

edit on 62017SaturdayfAmerica/Chicago490 by Wolfenz because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 05:13 PM
link   
a reply to: M4ngo

Nothing else got near WTC 7. It suffered major damage. It was intact before the collapse. WTC 1 threw debris all over the area around it.

So what's your reason for the damage to building 7?



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 05:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Wolfenz

A 707 trying to land lost in fog is a different impact than a 767 at high speed.



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 05:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

• In the NIST 2004 preliminary report, NIST suspected that debris from WTC1 (North tower) resulted in the 10-story destruction area at the WTC 7's south face. This was the reasoning of cause behind the building's collapse initially, according to NIST's 2004 preliminary.

• In the NIST 2008 final report, NIST suspects that, actually, it was office fires that caused the collapse of WTC7—a high-rise, steel frame building.



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 05:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Wolfenz

They didn't mention anything about the resulting fires in those videos.

The towers did not fall from the impacts alone.



new topics

top topics



 
72
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join