It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mike Flynn Offers to Testify in Exchange for Immunity - The Wall Street Journal

page: 8
92
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: chaeone86
a reply to: Baddogma

That's the most poorly composed attorney letter I've ever read. No reference to statute, for starts. I've read contracts professionally for 10 years and my first reaction to that was wow, what a crappy lawyer.


The letter could just be a standard red herring.

Even lawyers do that.





posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
I don't mean to be unkind to any Trump supporters visiting ... but, some of these posts smell of desperation.

You really don't have to work to discredit anything you think threatens Mr. Trump ... this probably doesn't have anything to with him.

...
...

Nyah, y'all should probably get busy.


It's more like anticipation really. I'm just waiting for Trumps biggest bombshell that he has already in store for us to drop. Fake News are busy outlying each other and i wonder what spooked them so hard. They don't even care what they print or broadcast is true or not anymore.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: knowledgehunter0986

Yeah because innocent people always ask for immunity from prosecution.


+8 more 
posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Perfectenemy

So, to summarize:

Anything that is negative for Mr. Trump, including one of the most conservative newspapers in the country is fake news.

You believe that Mr. Trump is a mastermind that, for some reason, keeps falling flat on his face with one foolish move after another, merely to sate his own ego.

Am I hearing you correctly?


+2 more 
posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: chaeone86
a reply to: Baddogma

That's the most poorly composed attorney letter I've ever read. No reference to statute, for starts. I've read contracts professionally for 10 years and my first reaction to that was wow, what a crappy lawyer.


The letter could just be a standard red herring.

Even lawyers do that.



"A standard red herring" eh? Yes, I'm sure that's what an attorney of a man seeking immunity would do.

OH Xuenchen, you never fail to fulfill expectations.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:39 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

No. They don't. Any letter without actual statute reference is sort of a red flag. I'm not sure the posted document is real.

Having been involved in multiple corporate lawsuits and overseeing contract management for a financial firm, I can unequivocally say this entry is a fake. No lawyer would ever write like this ever.

Which begs the question - is this part of a cognitive dissonance campaign over a fake news story about Flynn- maybe he never made that overture to the FBI/investigators at all? I'm open minded to it. and I'm calling my friends at the FBI tomorrow to hear their side. This is all too fishy.

But at once, I'm certain the WSJ Would not have reported without good cause for concern or real evidence. We shall see.
edit on 30-3-2017 by chaeone86 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:40 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Sure there is. You just called it fake.
That's your problem. The proof that he asked is right there.
I haven't seen a tweet from him denying it. Have you?



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: knowledgehunter0986

Yeah because innocent people always ask for immunity from prosecution.


I know right!!
www.cnn.com...



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

Anything that is negative for Mr. Trump, including one of the most conservative newspapers in the country is fake news.


Thanks to the media and the democrats, that is actually fairly close.
The nonsense peddled over and over and over has done nothing but tarnish the truth.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: knowledgehunter0986

Yeah because innocent people always ask for immunity from prosecution.


I know right!!
www.cnn.com...



Okay now, fun's fun, but answer honestly ... are you saying you think Cheryl Mills was innocent?



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:42 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Where and when. You can't just throw that out there .



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

Sure there is. You just called it fake.
That's your problem. The proof that he asked is right there.
I haven't seen a tweet from him denying it. Have you?


The whole thing is fake and blown out of proportion.



It's a red herring.

Classic.

And yes, Flynn is a Democrat.




posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Agit8dChop

originally posted by: Gryphon66

Anything that is negative for Mr. Trump, including one of the most conservative newspapers in the country is fake news.


Thanks to the media and the democrats, that is actually fairly close.
The nonsense peddled over and over and over has done nothing but tarnish the truth.



So, how do you know the truth, if all media is lying?

Have you been hanging out with Mr. Trump?



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:44 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I wish there were some way to hold you to these pronouncements.

Just to be clear, it is your assertion that the Wall Street Journal is lying, and that if it isn't, there's still nothing to the story that Mike Flynn wants to cut a deal for immunity.

Yes, or no?



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

No, and I also don't believe Flynn is completely innocent either (surprise!!). I'll wait for more evidence however.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:46 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Offer facts rather than conjecture.

Manage the fire, don't fan flames.

Prove you are a seeker of truth. Your posts are disruptive, and not in a good way. You provide subjective little nothings to prove a point. Rather than objective facts. Come on man. Let's do better.

For example: I just readily admitted I question the entire story based on that letter posted. It's clearly fake. I am open to change my viewpoint when confronted with evidence. Even tho my crazy left wing self would love to subscribe to the idea that the entire executive branch are Russian operatives, I was willing to keep my mind open and even challenge supposed evidence that may or may not aid my own confirmation bias.

Give it a try.

edit on 30-3-2017 by chaeone86 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:49 PM
link   
a reply to: marg6043

He owns it he doesn't write the articles.
Jesus Christ.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:49 PM
link   
a reply to: knowledgehunter0986

Funny how that worked out then isn't it. LOL.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:50 PM
link   
a reply to: marg6043




Or because what he have can actually open a can of worn on the former administration.





posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:51 PM
link   
a reply to: marg6043

Tell it to Richard Nixon







 
92
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join