It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: diggindirt
We?
Not me dude. I stay clean I have no reason to ask for immunity.
Where were you when Bryan Pagliano asked and everyone swore it was because he did something to help Hillary commit a crime ???
originally posted by: diggindirt
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: diggindirt
We?
Not me dude. I stay clean I have no reason to ask for immunity.
Where were you when Bryan Pagliano asked and everyone swore it was because he did something to help Hillary commit a crime ???
Don't recall that particular case but if I was commenting I was saying the same thing I'm saying now. When life walks up to you and smacks you in the face, you might change your mind too. I was clean. I had done nothing illegal but others in the business had done wrong and I had no idea if I had been involved or not. You cannot control what others around you do and there are times when you can be swept where you never imagined you would be.
Just what is a proffer and what are the perils of entering into a proffer agreement (also known as a proffer letter) with the federal government? Proffer or "queen for a day" letters are written agreements between federal prosecutors and individuals under criminal investigation which permit these individuals to tell the government about their knowledge of crimes, with the supposed assurance that their words will not be used against them in any later proceedings. (The individuals can either be witnesses, subjects or targets of a federal investigation, although it is subjects and targets who provide most proffers.)
If you enter into one of these agreements, you will proffer information orally in a proffer or queen for a day "session" attended by you, your attorney, the Assistant U.S. Attorney ("AUSA") and one or more federal agents. (In recent times, regulatory attorneys have been attending proffer sessions, when the government is engaged in parallel civil and criminal investigations.) You should think of a proffer session as a sneak preview in which you show the federal authorities what you can bring to the table if they cut a deal with you. - See more at: corporate.findlaw.com...
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Gryphon66
No, and I also don't believe Flynn is completely innocent either (surprise!!). I'll wait for more evidence however.
The intelligence chairman’s sources, according to the New York Times, were a pair of Trump appointees: Ezra Cohen-Watnick, a detailee from the Defense Intelligence Agency who is senior director for intelligence at the National Security Council, and Michael Ellis, an assistant White House counsel for national security affairs. They are not just any presidential appointees. National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster recently tried to fire Cohen-Watnick, a holdover selected by his predecessor, Michael Flynn, and Trump himself ordered McMaster to stand down. Ellis, the White House lawyer, used to work for Nunes on the intelligence committee.
Were the president’s men using the surveillance assets of the U.S. government to track the FBI investigation from the outside?
originally posted by: diggindirt
a reply to: Gryphon66
He wants immunity because that is the practical thing to do when you don't know all there is to know about a case. He seeks to clear his name if the attorney letter is real. I don't know what he knows but he knows that he doesn't know everything there is to know about the case.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
Maybe what Flynn has to say was that he was intentionally planted in order to push the Russia story in an effort to discredit Trump. He did work for Obama.