It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Russia scandal? Inside the Obama-Clinton uranium deal which is the real scandal IMO

page: 2
23
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:52 AM
link   
Keep fighting over who is connected to Russia, while you do that both sides are probably connected to them and real issues continue to be ignored.

Just like with every other MSM talking point this will eventually fade into obscurity without any resolution ever being reached one way or the other and you guys will continue to waste your time on distractions pushed by the media instead of real issues which the media continues to ignore.

Keep wasting your time, those in power are eating it up and loving it. Keep dancing to the tune of the pied piper (the media), they'll keep playing as long as you dance along to it.
edit on 3/30/2017 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:56 AM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

It is surreal how people eat it up. When "their" person does the misdeed the argument often looks like" well so and so never got in trouble there for my guy should be able to do illegal things".
edit on 30-3-2017 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 08:01 AM
link   
a reply to: luthier

They're addicted to the narrative being spun by the media and can't get enough of it. It's very sad to see people believing they're part of some kind of revolution when in reality they are just being led around by the nose.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 08:10 AM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Personally I would love all the Russia and nefarious ties of every one exposed.

It's a win win for everybody and crosses party lines.

As a former builder (20 years) ...a real estate agent is the last person in the world I would choose as president. I don't even need to look at a party to look elsewhere. The fact that the guys father was charged twice for profiteering on government building projects just makes it even more hilarious.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 08:30 AM
link   
a reply to: 727Sky

You disagree with facts?

Answer a simple question.

Did Hillary Clinton approve the mergers associated with Uranium One or not?



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 09:02 AM
link   
a reply to: 727Sky

Yes the links from this big scandal gone under the table is starting to shape up and is going to be in the media, in order to show the voters that is bigger scandals that has been ignored and is not only the wiretapping.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 09:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: 727Sky

Yes the links from this big scandal gone under the table is starting to shape up and is going to be in the media, in order to show the voters that is bigger scandals that has been ignored and is not only the wiretapping.



Yep another huge scandal is www.homelandsecurityus.com... about the Awan brothers and the security leaks... Funny how we do not hear about actual crimes like we do about stuff that so far has no proof just MSN innuendo



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 09:26 AM
link   
a reply to: 727Sky

Already the opening of the hearing for the Russian meddling in our elections is been politicized by the Democrats, this attempt by the democrats to gain momentum for mid term elections is going to back fire on their arses.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 09:34 AM
link   
a reply to: marg6043

You think so? Worse than a tax plan failure, health, care failure, budget failure?

Trump has as many dirty birds around him as Clinton. Accept they are also political amateurs who aren't as good at hiding.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 09:55 AM
link   
Russia does not need Uranium, they have plenty of it, they are #2 on the List following Australia, around 1000tonnes + a year.

en.wikipedia.org...

Grasping...straws.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 10:02 AM
link   
This subject should not be ignored. It is severe conflict of interest by Clinton. This is way worse than what I so far have heard about Trump, it is funny that there is so much tension between putin and Hillary. I bet Hillary expected more than the money, she thought she could influence the Russian elections without being chastised by their government because she did this deal. Some people, give them an inch and they take a mile. She thinks everyone is a pushover.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 10:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: 727Sky
It has been said that the best defense is a strong offense which comes to mind when you keep hearing those who want to push a Russian Trump connection.... When the real connection is the uranium deal Clinton had a hand in and her husband made the big bucks...



Tens of millions of dollars from uranium investors flowed into the Clinton Foundation, and Bill Clinton received a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian bank tied to the Kremlin before Secretary of State Hillary Clinton helped decide whether to approve the sale to the Russian government of a company that held one-fifth of America’s uranium capacity.


www.wnd.com...


The 2010 deal for a majority stake of Canadian-based Uranium One – which required approval from Clinton’s State Department and eight other federal agencies – and its plausible connection to major donations to the Clinton Foundation was exposed by author Peter Schweizer in his book “Clinton Cash and confirmed in a 3,000 word, front-page story by the New York Times.


IMO a plausible connection is a 500,000$ understatement !


The origin of the deal traced back to 2005, when mining financier Frank Giustra traveled with Bill Clinton to work out an agreement with the government of Kazakhstan for mining rights.

Giustra has donated $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation.


Nothing to see here as it is just business as usual for the Clinton crime cabal... Of course Podesta was on the board of the energy company in question but as the defenders will say any connection is utterly baseless.


The Times observed: “Still, the ultimate authority to approve or reject the Russian acquisition rested with the cabinet officials on the foreign investment committee, including Mrs. Clinton — whose husband was collecting millions in donations from people associated with Uranium One.”





While this is definitely a part of showing her connections with Russia, the larger story is the Podesta, Joule issue and Hillary/Obama pushing RUSNANO past the sanctions allowing them to build RUSNANO US here DURING sanctions. Shockingly, the RUSNANO US President just happens to be on the board for Joule, oh and Joule was bought by RUSNANO and the President of RUSNANO in Russia was appointed by none other than Putin himself.

And yes, Hillary was directly involved in getting RUSNANO into the US....during the time of heavy sanctions on Russia.

Odd how a company with a President appointed by Putin was allowed to purchase Joule and build a facility in the US under Obama and Hillary's watch.....



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 10:22 AM
link   
Other related thread to my post...

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 10:30 AM
link   
a reply to: luthier

Blame that on the democrats that had vowed from the time Trump won the elections to stop everything Trump does.

Then you have the Republicans that are still clueless on what they are doing in congress.

The president put the ideas on the table, congress does the work to make sure they are to help the American people working for the American people.

Trump doesn't make laws, congress makes laws.That is how government works.

Americas politics has become dysfunctional



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 10:32 AM
link   
a reply to: rickymouse

I know right? the Clinton foundation the biggest money laundering enterprise in the history of the US.

But Russia won the elections, because they colluded with Trump so the Hillary hag will lose, when the pay off was for Hillary to win the elections.

What that tells you.






posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 10:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: rickymouse
This subject should not be ignored. It is severe conflict of interest by Clinton. This is way worse than what I so far have heard about Trump, it is funny that there is so much tension between putin and Hillary. I bet Hillary expected more than the money, she thought she could influence the Russian elections without being chastised by their government because she did this deal. Some people, give them an inch and they take a mile. She thinks everyone is a pushover.


IF you are referring to Uranium One, there was no conflict of interest. Clinton didn't make the decision for State, which was one of nine (9) departments that signed off on the deal; further, it had to be approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (which did approve it noting that the uranium in question WOULD STAY IN THE US.)



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 10:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

But your argument against the allegations against Trump connections with Russia is that Russia is good? We need Russia?


So, let me get this straight ... Russia = Bad under Obama, Russia = Good under Trump.


What absolute rot.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 10:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: rickymouse

I know right? the Clinton foundation the biggest money laundering enterprise in the history of the US.

But Russia won the elections, because they colluded with Trump so the Hillary hag will lose, when the pay off was for Hillary to win the elections.

What that tells you.





Marg, what is it that you are so upset with Clinton about in this post ... can you name it? Other than generalized hate?



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 11:07 AM
link   
Hillary Clinton as SoS was on the CFIUS.

Composition of CFIUS




posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 11:29 AM
link   
What is worry some is that selling it to other countries makes it harder to pinpoint the origins and those responsible for an explosion event. Could this selling of uranium make for a cover for a false flag? Scientists would test after an explosion to find out through markers where the uranium was mined. An explosion could have all the markers of US uranium. How would they find the culprits? All their tests could now lead them in the wrong direction and a wrong answer.



new topics

top topics



 
23
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join