It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: 727Sky
Yes the links from this big scandal gone under the table is starting to shape up and is going to be in the media, in order to show the voters that is bigger scandals that has been ignored and is not only the wiretapping.
originally posted by: 727Sky
It has been said that the best defense is a strong offense which comes to mind when you keep hearing those who want to push a Russian Trump connection.... When the real connection is the uranium deal Clinton had a hand in and her husband made the big bucks...
Tens of millions of dollars from uranium investors flowed into the Clinton Foundation, and Bill Clinton received a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian bank tied to the Kremlin before Secretary of State Hillary Clinton helped decide whether to approve the sale to the Russian government of a company that held one-fifth of America’s uranium capacity.
The 2010 deal for a majority stake of Canadian-based Uranium One – which required approval from Clinton’s State Department and eight other federal agencies – and its plausible connection to major donations to the Clinton Foundation was exposed by author Peter Schweizer in his book “Clinton Cash and confirmed in a 3,000 word, front-page story by the New York Times.
IMO a plausible connection is a 500,000$ understatement !
The origin of the deal traced back to 2005, when mining financier Frank Giustra traveled with Bill Clinton to work out an agreement with the government of Kazakhstan for mining rights.
Giustra has donated $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation.
Nothing to see here as it is just business as usual for the Clinton crime cabal... Of course Podesta was on the board of the energy company in question but as the defenders will say any connection is utterly baseless.
The Times observed: “Still, the ultimate authority to approve or reject the Russian acquisition rested with the cabinet officials on the foreign investment committee, including Mrs. Clinton — whose husband was collecting millions in donations from people associated with Uranium One.”
originally posted by: rickymouse
This subject should not be ignored. It is severe conflict of interest by Clinton. This is way worse than what I so far have heard about Trump, it is funny that there is so much tension between putin and Hillary. I bet Hillary expected more than the money, she thought she could influence the Russian elections without being chastised by their government because she did this deal. Some people, give them an inch and they take a mile. She thinks everyone is a pushover.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: rickymouse
I know right? the Clinton foundation the biggest money laundering enterprise in the history of the US.
But Russia won the elections, because they colluded with Trump so the Hillary hag will lose, when the pay off was for Hillary to win the elections.
What that tells you.