It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
While posted at the intake structure one night, he observed an “unidentified flying object” fly down the Missouri River about 150 feet in the air and hover in front of the intake. He observed it for a few moments and then contacted a fellow security officer who also observed it (he could not recall the individual’s name exactly but his first name was [REDACTED] and his last name was either [REDACTED ]. After they together observed the UFO, it turned and went back up the river and did not come back that shift. He and the other officer shared their observation with their peers who did not believe them. The next evening he again was posted at the intake and observed the UFO return again. This time he didn’t call anyone until the UFO had traversed into the protected area and hovered above the protected area just north of the Reactor Building. He said it was roughly triangular in shape with a circle of rotating lights on the bottom. He could not hear any propulsion noise from the UFO. He believes that it was roughly 1/3 the size of the Reactor Building. Once the UFO hovered in the protected area. He called the security break room and most of the officers on shift observed the UFO.
While posted at the intake structure one night, he observed an “unidentified flying object” fly down the Missouri River about 150 feet in the air and hover in front of the intake...
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: data5091
While posted at the intake structure one night, he observed an “unidentified flying object” fly down the Missouri River about 150 feet in the air and hover in front of the intake...
Okay, so the focus was the cooling water intake to the nuclear plant. So okay, it was monitoring the intake to a power plant. What ever for? If we propose that was the focus and it was hovering, and the plant was operating, we might be able to conclude it was measuring the volume of water going in as one means to determine the size of the reactor core based on the flow of water required to cool it...
What else(?)
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Alien Abduct
Imo, that guy is lying...
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Alien Abduct
Imo, that guy is lying...
And so was his C.O.? (I actually didn't look into his commanding officer's testimony) What does he gain from lying? Do you think everyone on the original disclosure project panel is lying?
I'm not looking for an argument, just kinda picking your brain here.
What's your take of the UFO phenomenon?