It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NBC News: Hillary Clinton ‘Covered Up’ Pedophile Ring At State Department

page: 13
142
<< 10  11  12    14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 12:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: cfnyaami

Sheriffs are elected which means if they don't do their job they lose it. The creeps have to reside and organize in a county somewhere. Has anyone tried who has probable cause proof?



I'm not sure if you noticed above, MOMof3, but this entire thing was settled in 2014; there was never any statements about an "elite pedophile ring" and the one man (our Ambassador to Belgium) was cleared of the allegations after an extensive investigation.

IN short, this thread is BS.




posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: shawmanfromny

Not surprising that she'd have done this; many of us have known about the child porn rings operating out of the State Department and Pentagon for years now.

What does surprise me is that it leaked out on NBC, but I take it that the story was carried by a local NBC affiliate? Someone's head will roll. And this story will never make the big time; it'll be shut down and sequestered. Nothing substantive can be done about this because the people involved are too rich and powerful.



posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: TonyS

You post is a sad commentary on what passes as reality in this country these days.... Good luck to you as you live under many similar false assumptions, no doubt.



posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 02:14 PM
link   
a reply to: TownCryer

I don't know what false assumptions you're talking about. But the truth is there's a lot sad about the US these days.



posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 02:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

I kind of figured that out when they say all the law are involved too. Where are they trying to lead us? Or divert us?



posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 02:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: Gryphon66

I kind of figured that out when they say all the law are involved too. Where are they trying to lead us? Or divert us?



Sorry MOM.... who's "they"?

Here's the facts.

1. Allegations were made in mid-2013 alleging that certain investigations into bad behavior and illegal actions had been squeeched at the State Department by "higher ups." CBS broke the story, followed by NBC and CBS.

2. These allegations NEVER included any citation to Hillary Clinton or to an "elite pedophile ring" at the State Department.

3. During John Kerry's term all of these allegations were investigated and found to be without merit, in particular, the accusation that Howard Gutman, Ambassador to Belgium, had been seeking out underage prostitutes in a park near his residence (in Belgium). The IG published a report on the matter (linked above) and the State Department officially apologized to Gutman. This was in October 2014.

4. The whole thing started getting dredged up a few days ago in the right-wing blogsphere/echo chamber ... which resulted in the creation of this thread.



posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 03:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Boadicea

Fair enough, and I can understand why you may have responded differently than you otherwise would have because you believed that I was responding directly to you.


Thank you -- I appreciate that. I'm glad we hashed this out

And how bout we start over and find out how I would have responded if I had read it as a response to the OP instead of me? I'll track it back and respond to that post with that knowledge... give me a few!



posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 03:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Boadicea

Always runnin around trying to pick fights, Bo. God



Trying? Just TRYING? REALLY???

Hrmph. I'll remember this...



posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 03:48 PM
link   
Totally agree....this a big diversion from some really bad liberal corrupt activities...maybe evidence Obama wiretapped Trump and other Americans?



posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 04:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

CBS broke the story, followed by NBC and CNN.

I just noticed that error from my post most recent to this one.



posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 06:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Whoever is stirring the pot over lies. Anyway, I can't tell the liars from the plain speakers anymore. Wish yall luck.



posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 06:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: Gryphon66

Whoever is stirring the pot over lies. Anyway, I can't tell the liars from the plain speakers anymore. Wish yall luck.



You too MOM.

Welcome to post-reality.



posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 08:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: TramperoJuan

originally posted by: scubagravy
Trey Gowdy for President,

Or as the American people will have it, Kim Kardashian, Oprah or Carslon Crestely.


Or Donald Trump, right? But that would be inconvenient to your little narrative, wouldn't it?


Narrative ?? BAHAHA,

Im Australian, to be honest, this all looks like a big bloody joke standing on the outside lookin in.....

America....

The Great Entertainer.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 12:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

I actually believe there is a pedo ring out there JUST bc this topic wont go away in general. As far as this OP.. the damn thing has been at the top of the worlds biggest conspiracy site for days and the title is quite specific and alot of people are accepting the title as fact.

This OP is either the greatest live example of fake news I have ever seen or somehow your analysis of events is not 100% discrediting the title of this OP.

Seems to me the GDP number being released tomorrow should have more of our attention unless this old news report from years ago is actually telling us something for 3 days #rant#rant#rant

edit on 30-3-2017 by tonycodes because: You try and drink and think for me.. Ok?



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 08:42 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Okay, starting over here... and in the interest of full disclosure, I did take some time to look up the end result, to make sure I wasn't mis-remembering the situation. And I don't necessarily disagree with you as far as your comment goes, but I think it's more than that.


I love the smell of disinfo in the morning!


No, you don't
But your point is well taken.


- NBC never claimed that Hillary Clinton covered up a pedophile ring. So that's a lie.
- The allegations didn't involve a ring but rather a single ambassador. So that's a lie.
- Clinton herself wasn't implicated. So that's a lie.


You're right. Hillary wasn't accused of anything in these whistleblower claims -- the only mention of her name in the newscast is that it happened while Hillary was Secretary. And looking forward, Hillary was never named as one of the State Dept officials who intervened/interfered in investigations. Cheryl Mills was, but even that would seem to have been done at Obama's request/demand, NOT Hillary's request/demand.

To the best of my knowledge, the specific whistleblower claims were available for perusal at the time of this news report, and are definitely available now, so there is no reasonable excuse for dredging this up today without also bringing up the end result, in which Hillary was still not named as a party to the intervention/interference.

I'm not surprised though. It's become a pattern... the "Hillary In Name Only" pattern and I even wrote a thread on the subject months ago. My very strong opinion -- yes, I know it's just an opinion -- is that there is a power struggle within the party, and it's just so darn easy to blame anything and everything on the Hillary boogeyman and -- of course -- too many people are too quick to instantly believe the worst about Hillary, so everyone focuses on the bogus stories and the critters continue to do their dirty deeds in relative obscurity.

Do I think Hillary's a saint? Nope. Do I think Hillary's a devil incarnate? Nope. And I sure don't think that Hillary is the all-powerful boogeyman she is made out to be. But that's the position she has been put in... why? I'm not sure. I can only speculate.


Is it in any surprise with #RussiaGate heating up and calls for Nunes to recuse himself, somebody steps in to supply the demand for distraction?


Oddly enough (or not!), the same day this was posted, I saw another old story rehashed at another site... very much the same M.O., a few facts to set a narrative but certainly not all the facts... therefore certainly not the whole truth. It does strike me as more than coincidence. But I'm not ready to say it's to deflect from Russiagate. It could be. But I tend to think that RussiaGate and the Trump surveillance are all tied up together and that lots of critters on BOTH sides have lots to lose if the whole truth comes out.

For example, if Obama was spying on Trump (and let's be real, we're all being spied upon!), then there were Republican critters who knew about it too and did nothing to stop it... and may very well have been involved up to their eyeballs. "Never Trumpers" would have been all over this with unmitigated glee!


And right on time, YourFakeNewsWire delivers with 4 year-old allegation — allegations that were already blitzed in the media and investigated — involving an ambassador slipping his security detail to hook up with underaged prostitutes while Clinton was Sec State and that higher ups, possibly her, "quashed" the investigation.


Your point is well taken, again; and it was no doubt presented in this way knowingly and deliberately... at the very least, even if Hillary didn't intervene/interfere personally, Hillary did not stop it either. All the focus is on Hillary... just as someone wants it. Who? Qui bono???


Then we've got the 4 year-old exerpts and some garbage about Trump conflated for good measure and if that wasn't enough, a story about one of the tens of thousands of mayors in the United States being convicted of sexual molestation under the bulls# title, "First Democrat Official Tied To Elite Pedophile Ring Pleads Guilty."


Quite a stretch, eh? But very effective in playing to the very real and disturbing claims of a DC pedophile ring because by golly gee this mayor's a Democrat so they all must be exactly the same and doing exactly the same things... Not in any way practical or productive, but effective.


EDIT:

And by the way, continuing to indulge in this politically-motivated modern day Satanic Panic bull# only muddies the water when it comes to the real incidents of sexual molestation and human trafficking that are certainly happening. Jumping at any chance to try to link Clinton or some other Democrat to pedophilia time after time only makes everyone else less likely to pay attention.


This^^^ cannot be said enough, and I honestly feel this is at least part of what's going on -- a BIG part of what's really going on. There are, no doubt, pedophiles in DC. They're everywhere. The question is who are they? The real pedophiles will do anything they can and must to protect themselves and to direct suspicion elsewhere. But I have seen absolutely nothing that conclusively implicates Hillary in any of it. Even in the Wikileaks email leaks, there were no emails to or from Hillary -- zero, zilch, nada -- and no emails directly implicating Hillary. And yet, even PG is constantly characterized as being run by Hillary!!! That's not an accident and it's not a coincidence.

So, yeah, we're all being played... but it's only possible due to the gross lack of transparency in government -- not to mention the bully tactics and other abuses of power -- enabling the facts and the truth to be spun in countless directions, and the impossibility of you and me even knowing the truth.



posted on Mar, 31 2017 @ 04:23 PM
link   
did anyone talk about how the pizza shop owner is suing Alex Jones over damages? The owner has had on duty armed guards since the shooting. Alex jones had apologized and stopped from covering the story, a little short of saying the story was BS.



posted on Mar, 31 2017 @ 06:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: shawmanfromny

But... but.... Alex Jones is a liar, right?


And they told us not to listen to Alex Jones because we were showing our ignorance, right? We were told to ignore him nothing to see. He's a con man?



posted on Mar, 31 2017 @ 07:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: vjr1113
did anyone talk about how the pizza shop owner is suing Alex Jones over damages? The owner has had on duty armed guards since the shooting. Alex jones had apologized and stopped from covering the story, a little short of saying the story was BS.


Alex Jone said long ago the pizza place might be a diversion. All that stuff came off Wikileaks so Alex wasn't the first to talk about it. With all that sick art that guy had up in his pizza resteraunt, he brought it on himself.



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 12:13 AM
link   
Wow crazy



posted on Apr, 1 2017 @ 06:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: MysterX

You're still misusing the word figurehead. It means one who represents something else but really has no power or effect.

Do you have any evidence that Clinton acted to cover anything up back in the day regarding this "topic" or not?


Personally?

Nope, but thankfully, that isn't down to me, but rather down to those empowered, resourced and who's remit it is to discover and produce it, probably volumes of it, and then you can come back and eat lashings of humble pie, in between penning your love letters to Clinton in pokey.




edit on 1 4 2017 by MysterX because: typo



new topics

top topics



 
142
<< 10  11  12    14 >>

log in

join