It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Nunes Says Source is Executive Branch?

page: 4
27
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 07:44 PM
link   
Lynch is gonna get thrown to the wolves after all the lies come out. I already stated in a previous thread that some judges made some questionable decisions and you don't spy on 180+ judges for nothing. I highly suspect that Obamas administration blackmailed some of them to vote in favor or against certain agendas. I'm still on the fence if Obama knew about it or not. It sure seems people going rogue on both sides but with all the smoke and mirrors on the Dems part and Comey investigating Hillary like a 2 year old i tend to trust Trump more on all of this. There is also a lot of war mongering on a certain side that is pretty troublesome. The people who started the rumour about the russian ties didn't present any evidence for their claims to this day.

I guess Nunes got tipped off about all the shady things that went on when Obama was still in office hence the secrecy. That made him question the FBI investigations into Trump and his administration. To be honest the FISA warrant got denied two times and by some miracle the third time they tried it got approved. That's dodgy as hell. I still think Comey is the leaker but something went wrong and the attention got shifted to the Obama administrtaion but are the masterminds behind the potenial Trump smear job really that stupid?

Btw i'm not always familiar with the laws in the US so please excuse me if this is a dumb question but is it possible for a president to switch his side to neither Dem or Rep and run as independent or create a completely new party?




posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:03 PM
link   
Latest word.

edit on 27-3-2017 by The GUT because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:11 PM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

WTF! Comey and Rogers didn't show up to the hearing behind closed doors?



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:11 PM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

Can't watch right now.
Does the committee have the "disturbing" reports yet?



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: The GUT

Can't watch right now.
Does the committee have the "disturbing" reports yet?


I'm not sure but Nunes used "we" a lot.



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:21 PM
link   
It's kinda weird that the FBI is still not fully cooperating but now the NSA swooped in to save the day. What the hell is going on? Do they defy Rogers orders or is he in on it and wants to stab Comey in the back? This is like a house of cards episode. Holy sh!t.



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Good. But the question I really want answered then is how does that fit in?

I'm seriously asking.



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:34 PM
link   
Comey and Rogers are acting shady as hell. Flynn turning on Trump wasn't even mentioned turns out to be another fake news. I think the FBI is in extremely hot water and it wasn't legal like some members here claimed. Trump was right all along again.



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
It's kinda weird that the FBI is still not fully cooperating but now the NSA swooped in to save the day. What the hell is going on? Do they defy Rogers orders or is he in on it and wants to stab Comey in the back? This is like a house of cards episode. Holy sh!t.

I'm thinking this is exactly why Nunes went the route he did. Our Congress hasn't had true oversight in many a year. Without that oversight, we, the public, get screwed again and again under the guise of national security by bad actors like that sleazy Schiff. Now--maybe and hopefully--our legitimate questions & concerns won't get swept under the stinky swamp.

Nunes went PUBLIC.



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Boadicea

I don't have enough information.

Either about the veracity of Montgomery's claims or about the reports that Nunes has been talking about.

edit on 3/27/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:40 PM
link   
a reply to: The GUT




Nunes went PUBLIC.


About what, exactly? Did he say anything more than he was "uncomfortable" about some people being unmasked?
edit on 3/27/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I don't have all the answers, Phage, then again I'm not the one that started an OP on my faulty understanding of the Executive Branch and a revised CNN report.



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:44 PM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

It wasn't revised when I made the thread.



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Boadicea

I don't have enough information.

Either about the veracity of Montgomery's claims or about the reports that Nunes has been talking about.


Fair enough. Neither do I.



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:53 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

There's only one executive branch. That would be trump.
Which one.. scoffs



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:55 PM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

Democrats are the ones wanting more oversight.



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Oh but it's just so so...ummm damning...

Isn't it. ¿ ¿



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 08:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: Phage

I don't have all the answers, Phage, then again I'm not the one that started an OP on my faulty understanding of the Executive Branch and a revised CNN report.


This is a pretty common happening when people use CNN as a source. They should be barred as a "source" right up there with "beforeitsnews.com" or "Sorcha Fall".



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 09:00 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Nice...
Call trump he's looking for an alibi err I mean story... your fiction is acceptable enough. He doesn't sweat the details anyway.



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 09:01 PM
link   
THE THING IS.... this committee is supposed to be investigating allegations of RUSSIA's Interference with our election, and possible collusion of some campaign members.

This is nothing but another diversion. A diversion that shows Nunes is not suited to lead this investigation. He's too sidetracked with what seems to be protecting Trump.

Even news sources seem to have forgotten the original intention. All they can talk about is Nunes and Trump. Anything but Russia and Collusion.




top topics



 
27
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join