posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 03:47 AM
a reply to: anonentity
Well as said in the chaos and order business; the unknown would be thought of as chaos until we put it into some order or definition... but that in
and of itself does not change anything except bring chaos to what is already naturally in order. For communicaions sake labeling is seen as order; to
fail at communicating the concept disorder or chaos. So even if both take to silence between each other, will the internal match the external? If the
internal in silence between the two is one of chaos then the only order stands outside of that, so when one brings that internal chaos outside it
hopes to settle it in the same order in a balance or rectification... of course this in motion just goes round and round and round. So bringing order
inside to match the order outside is peace; if there is chaos outside then order can still remain inside.
This play continues on and on giving rise to the countless myriad of things, tangible and intangible... much of it repeats over and over and over,
even though a name or form may change the repetition is still there... such as the all of everything is in a constant state of contact with everything
else; there is an illusion of separateness, but beynd the concept of separate where all is contact? I am touching your nose right now, as you are
touching a galaxy billions and billions of miles away and yet I am too... we all are.
These proofs are repetitions; many various cultures have had them many perhaps unknown of course would have them too, everything is in nature as it is
nothing cannot ever be outside of nature so all that can repeat will repeat... dogma of terms may change but the nature of whatever it is arising and
passing will not... such a thing is a constant but in awareness that depends on focus, view how much of it is covered up hiding whatever it is in it's
true nature? The silly thing is; that true nature is always there never covered up, but the concepts of all of this in differentiation? Poof covered
up... so we become blind to what is always in order in the choice of the chaos of concept that the mind holds onto.
Repetition of patterns occur everywhere, without it form would not seem to occur at all formlessness or void is the poteintial for form to develop,
but yet void is nonattached... it is the dimension parallel to the one of form inseperable. What occurs in it or this may be known or unknown
depending on observation of what arises and passes in the spheres or planes of reference; holding onto phenomena in any sphere of reference only
limits or burdens whomever is holding onto such.
Conceptual knowledge is infinite the grasping at any of it being permanent or even existant outside of the conceptual or the agreement to it existing
is going to remain ignorant to all that exists outside of such a thing or in the void of formlessness. This is likely from where the other
intelligence manifests; of course we have sort of the same effect on that side as well... just opposite in effect.
Whether such effects be seen as good or bad on either side of that experience? Same as view... relative to the observer or one holding onto such a