It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Astrocyte
I - and anyone else who is educated - has a healthy contempt for mysticism and magic that simply accepts the mindless assertions they make without subjecting those assertions to critical analysis. All critical thinking appears to be gone in such minds, and so, for all intents and purposes, they are incapable of seeing things properly.
Fools Crow repeatedly told Mails that the more humble and unselfish a person is, the more willing Wakan Tanka and his helpers of the four directions are willing to work through them. “Wakan Tanka is concerned with human needs, and not luxuries. If we want luxuries, He has given us at birth the power to work for and obtain these,” he said. People who have rid themselves of self-serving ego, like medicine and holy people, are the cleanest bones, he explained. “The cleaner the bone, the more water you can pour through it, and the faster it will run.”
From the few whose history is known, we find that some event of earliest childhood seems to have triggered or activated a particular neural field that then becomes sensitive to and can translate from a corresponding field or body of knowledge resonant with that event. The savant effect itself is then activated only by someone asking the individual a question related to the available body of knowledge or by the savant entering a situation that is resonant with his special ability. If his neural field is stimulated by sensory input of a similar nature from another person or situation, the savant responds reflexively. Ordinarily the savant can’t activate his capacity himself or reflect on it. Essentially his capacity happens to him, or through him.
Their sensory system picked up the frequency of the question coming from another person; their neural fields, resonant with that stimuli, responded by tuning into the resonant frequency of the corresponding nonlocal field or frequency field. As recipients of information through this resonant response, savants are probably the most bona fide channelers around.
*How could a verbal question trigger a neural field to trigger a corresponding frequency field into dynamic interaction? Sound is macrocosmic and localized, field is microcosmic and nonlocalized. Perhaps coherence is the medium of exchange.*
With few other neural structures functioning and no higher centers bringing discrimination or judgment, with no associative thinking to introduce doubt and the constraints of caution or concern over error, the field effect was wide open. Such radical openness led to the unconditioned nature of the twin’s knowledge about calenders, a kind of unconflicted neural behaviour. None of this explains where the information came from or where the fields are, only that the function exists. A field exists only as function, and the function exists only if a question is asked resonant with that field.
The question brings the field into existence as the answer. If there is no question asked of a savant or no environmental stimulus is given, however, there is no field.