It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Phoenix
Name one large scale government program that has not turned to "snip" due fraud, waste or beauracracy maintaining employment scheme that has met it's goals, budget and has not led to massive deficit increases - did I mention limited access to favored minority classes as well over majority population due political voting blocks, ahem.
this describes our military complex better than any other program the gov't has though... and it seems that the republicans are all for sending them more and more money to waste, lose, and screw us with!
medicare fraud and waste is just a speck of dust compared to what's been going on in the military budget!
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Offer membership in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program to all Americans for the same payroll contribution that Federal employees pay.
Let the market sort itself out.
originally posted by: MacK80
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Offer membership in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program to all Americans for the same payroll contribution that Federal employees pay.
Let the market sort itself out.
See here is the genius though: That would literally work, people just can't stick to one idea and focus.
It's almost like it's supposed to be broken at this level of movement.
The attractiveness of that particular idea is easily 8/10 though in a room of 1's and 0's on the whole scene.
The fraud is VERY deep indeed.....I have worked in medicine most of my life....and I have seen things first hand that would give ya'll a little idea why prices are so high in healthcare....and it IS a big racket!! So few really care....why I try to work for small practices, get my own healthcare at the smaller practices.......and the PHARM companies? The insurance companies? It makes big government look small in MY opinion.......
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
originally posted by: queenofswords
Half the country will pay for the other half regardless. Workers and producers will be taxed to pay for the non-workers and non-producers. It will be an expensive tax because there are a helluva lot of the latter.
Already about 50% of babies born here are financed by Medicaid.
There will be fraud, waste, and abuse because....well, it will be government run.
It's a conundrum. It is something we have to grapple with ideologically, morally, and economically.
Lets crack down on the fraud, have witnessed this first hand, and resulted in a multi million settlement, unfortunately the defendant died and they were never able to collect.
originally posted by: Phoenix
a reply to: Bluesma
Yeah hear you, being more or less exposed to the executive level and witnessing through experience of spouse the corruption on daily basis I have no illusions of altruism by any connected to financial end of the business.
The government has two responsibilities in this system:
The first is a government responsibility that fixes the rate at which medical expenses should be negotiated and it does this in two ways. The Ministry of Health directly negotiates prices of medicine with the manufacturers, based on the average price of sale observed in neighbouring countries. A board of doctors and experts decides if the medicine provides a valuable enough medical benefit to be reimbursed (note that most medicine is reimbursed, including homeopathy). In parallel, the government fixes the reimbursement rate for medical services. Doctors choose to be in Sector 1 and adhere to the negotiated fees, to Sector 2 and be allowed to charge higher fees within reason ("tact and mesure") or Sector 3 and have no fee limits (a very small percentage of physicians, and their patients have reduced reimbursements). The social security system will only reimburse at the pre-set rate. These tariffs are set annually through negotiation with doctors' representative organisations.
The second government responsibility is oversight of health-insurance funds, to ensure that they are correctly managing the sums they receive, and to ensure oversight of the public hospital network.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Bluesma
The idea of competition doesn't really fit into the model. I understand your point about competition, but why would a public sector operation (none of which are renowned for efficiency) be able to offer anything at a lower cost (not to be confused with price) than a private sector operation? Is the public sector operation going to give itself a marketplace advantage somehow? If so, how is that a matter of competition?
What I perceive here is that the public sector has to compete in terms of quality of care.
The reason I separate cost and price, is that presumably the public sector operation would operate at cost, no fees added.
Thank you
I took time to contemplate your post,
For your next child, if there is one, would you choose the private provider from the get go? From your experience, do you have concerns about the quality of care from either? These aren't leading questions. I'm curious about your personal experience.