It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Donald Trump has just directly accused Obama of wire tapping trump residence part two

page: 27
16
<< 24  25  26   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 06:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: thedigirati
Susan Rice admits to the unmasking, the question is why did she do it? The intel agencies saw no reason to have them unmasked but Rice did. She may not have leaked the unmasked names, she certainly enabled them getting leaked.


Could it possibly be because the intercepts were so incriminating she wanted to get the the FBI to obtain a warrant so the intelligence collected could be used in a court of law? That is the way it is supposed to work.




posted on Apr, 4 2017 @ 06:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: thedigirati
Susan Rice admits to the unmasking, the question is why did she do it? The intel agencies saw no reason to have them unmasked but Rice did. She may not have leaked the unmasked names, she certainly enabled them getting leaked.


Could it possibly be because the intercepts were so incriminating she wanted to get the the FBI to obtain a warrant so the intelligence collected could be used in a court of law? That is the way it is supposed to work.


It should also be noted that she does not have the authority to unmask the names herself. That would have been done by the IC itself. Apparently there was just cause to do so.



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 08:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: thedigirati
Susan Rice admits to the unmasking, the question is why did she do it? The intel agencies saw no reason to have them unmasked but Rice did. She may not have leaked the unmasked names, she certainly enabled them getting leaked.


I will never understand why people, much like yourself, ask this question.

It's tantamount to going into a 7-11, purchasing an item, then calling the cops on the clerk who served you to have them arrested because they did their job.

Same thing here. By way of our taxes, we PAID HER to do precisely that....when a report came to her attention that might need further investigation, she furthered the investigation....so what are you asking really here, why she did it? Or why do we pay anyone at all to do that job? Otherwise your question has absolutely no significance.
edit on 5-4-2017 by alphabetaone because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 09:24 PM
link   
Questions will have to be asked and answered



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 10:16 PM
link   
So then...if Trumps info was unmasked and circulated....what, exactly, has come of it? Flynn? They caught him "discussing sanctions" by saying, "yeah, yeah, any of that will have to be done later". His "making deals with the russians" isn't flimsy....but that piece of evidence is flimsy as all hell. Is that the best that came of the Trump wiretaps/unmasking?

Do any of us believe if there was proof of Trumps wrongdoing it would already be in the spotlight? I can't imagine anyone would waste a second removing a treasonous president.



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 10:30 PM
link   
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

Right.


Doesn't that beg the question then, is this alleged "unmasking" being overblown just for a magnified talking point?



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 10:35 PM
link   
a reply to: alphabetaone

I think FauxMaulder had a decent point: the Russian thing all happened after the DNC emails, as a deflection from what was contained in them (not nuclear in damage....but pretty damaging nonetheless). Shortly thereafter you start seeing all sorts of stuff about Russia and Trump flying out of official channels, with Hillary even insinuating it.

So the DNC gets hacked, uses Russia colluding with Trump as deflection (Russia may have been involved...but not Trump), then begins circulating unmasked wiretaps.

That sounds pretty damning to me. Of course, most of this is "sources say". But still....



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 10:59 PM
link   
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan


If it were that simple though, Flynn never would have resigned. There would have been no motivation for him to do so especially not on the strength of a deflection.


Besides, weren't investigations into Russian interference being carried out before the DNC email debacle?



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 11:12 PM
link   
a reply to: alphabetaone




Flynn never would have resigned.
I thought he was fired .



posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: alphabetaone




Flynn never would have resigned.
I thought he was fired .


Flynn was fired for lying to Vice President Pence about his conversation with the Russian Ambassador.



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 11:59 AM
link   
Some ore fresh news



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 05:09 PM
link   
DOJ requesting warrants to spy on Trump associates - check
DOJ requesting unmasking of American names in intelligence reports to reveal Trump associates and what they were saying and planning - check
GCHQ involved as claimed - check.

Obama spying on Trump - check.



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 07:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
DOJ requesting warrants to spy on Trump associates - check
DOJ requesting unmasking of American names in intelligence reports to reveal Trump associates and what they were saying and planning - check
GCHQ involved as claimed - check.

Obama spying on Trump - check.


Wrong. The "Five Eyes" came across evidence that Trump associates were colluding with Russian agents and notified the American government. The American intelligence establishment had no choice but to investigate potential treason.



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 08:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: UKTruth
DOJ requesting warrants to spy on Trump associates - check
DOJ requesting unmasking of American names in intelligence reports to reveal Trump associates and what they were saying and planning - check
GCHQ involved as claimed - check.

Obama spying on Trump - check.


Wrong. The "Five Eyes" came across evidence that Trump associates were colluding with Russian agents and notified the American government. The American intelligence establishment had no choice but to investigate potential treason.


Are they finished investigating yet? If Trump associates were colluding improperly, they didn't stop just before the spying started. The FBI, CIA, NSA should have the PROOF of collusion in hand. Our spy agencies can't be that inept, can they?



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 08:51 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

The investigation is ongoing. In the United States it is necessary to have legally gathered evidence for a case to be made. Constitution, and all that. Things go much more quickly in Russia.



posted on Apr, 14 2017 @ 07:47 AM
link   
A bit OT but it needs to go somewhere



posted on Apr, 14 2017 @ 09:46 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Circus for the optics, nothing more.

Whether Trump was "outside the swamp" or not....he'll be the biggest gator in that swamp before its all said and done.



posted on Apr, 14 2017 @ 10:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: UKTruth
DOJ requesting warrants to spy on Trump associates - check
DOJ requesting unmasking of American names in intelligence reports to reveal Trump associates and what they were saying and planning - check
GCHQ involved as claimed - check.

Obama spying on Trump - check.


Wrong. The "Five Eyes" came across evidence that Trump associates were colluding with Russian agents and notified the American government. The American intelligence establishment had no choice but to investigate potential treason.


Lol, still clinging to your failed storyline of 'treason' I see.
Very amusing.



posted on Apr, 14 2017 @ 03:53 PM
link   
Good FOX clip with JW interview video.foxbusiness.com...=show-clips



posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 05:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: UKTruth
DOJ requesting warrants to spy on Trump associates - check
DOJ requesting unmasking of American names in intelligence reports to reveal Trump associates and what they were saying and planning - check
GCHQ involved as claimed - check.

Obama spying on Trump - check.


Wrong. The "Five Eyes" came across evidence that Trump associates were colluding with Russian agents and notified the American government. The American intelligence establishment had no choice but to investigate potential treason.


Lol, still clinging to your failed storyline of 'treason' I see.
Very amusing.


Still desperately trying to ridicule the possibility in the face of mounting evidence, I see.




top topics



 
16
<< 24  25  26   >>

log in

join