It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Donald Trump has just directly accused Obama of wire tapping trump residence part two

page: 25
16
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 05:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Sillyolme

www.abovetopsecret.com...



Thanks Foxy.
I need to soak in a hot tub for a bit. Hauling rocks and pebbles and raking and pulling weeds.
Ill look that over later.




posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 05:47 PM
link   
a reply to: desert

Right. They're all just coming across these documents in the damndest places. Sock drawers, under the sofa cushions.
Glued to the inside of a roll of paper towels in the men's room. I mean the place is lousy with classified info just laying around by those sloppy democrats that lived there before.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 05:50 PM
link   
Here is a more expanded version of the newsflash:


Mike Flynn Offers to Testify in Exchange for Immunity

Mike Flynn, President Donald Trump's former national security adviser, has told the Federal Bureau of Investigation and congressional officials investigating the Trump campaign's potential ties to Russia that he is willing to be interviewed in exchange for a grant of immunity from prosecution, according to officials with knowledge of the matter.

As an adviser to Mr. Trump's presidential campaign, and later one of Mr. Trump's top aides in the White House, Mr. Flynn was privy to some of the most sensitive foreign policy deliberations of the new administration and was directly involved in discussions about the possible lifting of sanctions on Russia imposed by the Obama administration.


(You need to subscribe to WSJ to access the full article. Only us crazy leftists subscribe to that pinko rag now.)

ETA: It's curious that he is referred to as "Mike" rather than "Michael" Flynn. Could this be more Russian fun and games?
edit on 30-3-2017 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 05:54 PM
link   
Flynn has told the FBI and others investigating trumps ties to Russian intervention that he will testify in exchange for immunity of prosecution.
Now what could he possibly need immunity for if he's so innocent?
And just what does he have on trump that he could offer in exchange for such a valuable deal?



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 05:57 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

They are reporting it on MSNBC as well though they too quote WSJ.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 05:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
BREAKING NEWS

Mike Flynn has just offered to testify in return for immunity!

Per WSJ



www.wsj.com...


uuuuHaHaHa

Getting real wack-o now !!




posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 06:01 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001


according to officials with knowledge of the matter.




uuuuuuuu



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 06:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

You could just say "no." You clearly think that I am a shill, don't you?

Anything is possible, but I'm not implying you are a shill. My best guess--if pressed--is that you're pathologically confused and permanently triggered. You asked.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 06:23 PM
link   
Trump's white Bronco chase is "go."



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 07:37 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Worth reading Flynn's lawyers statement. It's not anything like the WSJ story.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 08:58 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Assurances against unfair prosecution. Last sentence. What does that mean then?
Sounds like he asked for a deal. What ever the reason. He asked. He wants that assurance against unfair prosecution.
Oh and he certainly has a story to tell. Per his counsel.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 09:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

He's asking to be prosecuted fairly?
For what?



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 09:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

That's a pretty good point, and poor wording on his part. I think we he really meant was that he simply wants immunity from prosecution in exchange for his testimony.



posted on Mar, 31 2017 @ 12:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

No the letter from flynns lawyer said that anyone being questioned in this atmosphere basically would not agree to be questioned without assurance against unfair prosecution. Or something like that.
Lawyer speak...



posted on Mar, 31 2017 @ 12:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Right. As opposed to fair prosecution.

Why the adjective?



posted on Mar, 31 2017 @ 12:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

Worth reading Flynn's lawyers statement. It's not anything like the WSJ story.


Sorry, I'm chiming in late and must have missed this.

Can you provide a source for Flynn's lawyers's statement?



posted on Mar, 31 2017 @ 01:01 AM
link   
Not sure if this will cue up right, but Jeff Sessions seems pretty serious about felonious leakers at about 5:26. Sumbunny in big trouble.



posted on Mar, 31 2017 @ 01:06 AM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

Yup bust the leakers. That's a good thing.

Diverting from other stuff. Not such a good thing.

edit on 3/31/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2017 @ 01:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: The GUT

Yup bust the leakers. That's a good thing.

Leaking proven.


Diverting from other stuff. Not such a good thing.

Diverting: Speculation



posted on Mar, 31 2017 @ 01:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: ColdWisdom

Sorry, I'm chiming in late and must have missed this.

Can you provide a source for Flynn's lawyers's statement?



Twitter Link



new topics

top topics



 
16
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join