It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Donald Trump has just directly accused Obama of wire tapping trump residence part two

page: 2
16
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:34 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

DNI
Oversaw 16 intel agencies as I understand it.
Put out a fancy report in jan.




posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:36 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Oh. January.
Is it still January? And, again, who can (could) Clapper "clear?" Isn't that the provence of a judicial (or Congressional) body?
edit on 3/25/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

He took it upon himself to appear on mtp you should look up the transcript, interesting stuff.

This edit stuff is fun
I am pretty sure the fancy report clapper referred to was given to congress.

edit on 25/3/2017 by shooterbrody because: Edits



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:39 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody
I saw it.
And read it.

It was about a report issued in January.

One more time, what authority does Clapper have to "clear" anyone of anything?


edit on 3/25/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Well being the dni I would say he is an intelligence subject matter expert.

Ps
That means he analyzed the available intelligence and found No collusion and No crimes.
You know evidence of bad stuff you need to press charges.

edit on 25/3/2017 by shooterbrody because: Edits are fun



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:44 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

So, that makes him a judge? Or a member of a Congressional Committee?

Do you think that there is any chance that something more has been learned since that report he was talking about was issued? Do you think there is any chance that something more has been learned since he left office?



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Hey you want to discount the opinion of 16 intel agencies and the dni you go right ahead pal.
Perhaps some obama miracle happened and 16 intel agencies are wrong.



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:50 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

So, you ignore what I said. Even after editing you post.


edit on 3/25/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:52 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

About what?
Which edit?

Ps
Who asked for the report?
edit on 25/3/2017 by shooterbrody because: Edits are the new trend



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:54 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

The part after "subject matter expert."

Doesn't really matter. You did not change the gist of your post. Nor did you add relevance.
 


Who asked for the report?

I give. Who?

edit on 3/25/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:56 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Phage holds the ATS record for edits...the next 99 combined can't match it



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:58 AM
link   
a reply to: ParasuvO

I do?

Ah shucks.

edit on 3/25/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)

edit on 3/25/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)

edit on 3/25/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I believe that is called a "summary".

People include those so you don't have to read the entire report to get a basic understanding of its contents.

Are you disputing that clapper and the ic was tasked with the report?
edit on 25/3/2017 by shooterbrody because: Spelling error



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 02:01 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody




Are you disputing that clapper and the if was tasked with the report?

That doesn't make sense but I get your drift.
No, I don't dispute Clapper.

JAMES CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government.



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 02:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

So then you have some evidence that the nsa cia fbi or others that compiled that report (that obama ordered)don't?


Ps
The nsa has everything



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 02:12 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody




So then you have some evidence that the nsa cia fbi or others that compiled that report (that obama ordered)don't?

Of course I don't. Why would I?

What part of "after" do you not understand?
edit on 3/25/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 02:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Because you asked this

Do you think that there is any chance that something more has been learned since that report he was talking about was issued? Do you think there is any chance that something more has been learned since he left office?

Or was that your impression of jim carrey in dumb and dumber? "So your telling me there is a chance"



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 02:17 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

You don't think there is a chance that more has been learned since Clapper left government service.

You could have just said that.



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 02:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Did you miss the nsa part of the report?

Do you understand what the nsa can do?


That said
Investigate away
Tho I do not think the investigation will turn out well for you



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 02:23 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody


Did you miss the nsa part of the report?
Did you miss the date of that report?



new topics

top topics



 
16
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join