It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Donald Trump has just directly accused Obama of wire tapping trump residence part two

page: 1
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 12:46 AM
link   
As requested by Dont tread on Me in the other thread which was about to reach 400 pages.
edit on 3252017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)


HERE IS PART ONE
www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
5 tweets - read from the bottom up.......




This is the first I have heard of this accusation, for Trump to make such brazen claims suggests he has evidence to back it up - what that evidence is, is unknown and how it ties directly to Obama is so very very interesting.

Could this be the mother of all fake news, or the camel that breaks Obamas back?

Thoughts?


edit on Sat Mar 25 2017 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 12:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

400 pages holy shnikes...how can I not find this thread...can you link it por favor? And I think you mean "accused" in your title there maybe?

Yes you did mean that, you fixed it, disregard😉😉😉
edit on 315512America/ChicagoSat, 25 Mar 2017 00:55:59 -050031am3183America/Chicago by tigertatzen because: (no reason given)


+17 more 
posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 12:54 AM
link   
You stoopid dumb leftists. No, you stoopid dumb Trumpets. Where's your proof? No, where's your proof? Continue for 400 pages.

edit on 25-3-2017 by The GUT because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 12:56 AM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

Eeeek...maybe I don't want to read it after all...



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 12:57 AM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

We may be stupid but we sure as hell ain't dumb.

Wait..

Invert that.

Maybe.
edit on 3/25/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 12:59 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Geez, Phage, you can't even spell stoopid. Leftist.



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 12:59 AM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

Sure. Pick on the dixlexical.



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I gave you two stars though. I felt bad for your dislexical.
edit on 25-3-2017 by The GUT because: (no reason given)


+3 more 
posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:05 AM
link   
New York Times Headline

Wiretap



Which their source seemed to be a discredited
blogger that was spreading false information.

She turns out to be "news source" in the middle
of a dozen moon bat conspiracies about Russia and Trump
heatst.com...


Though many of her claims lack evidence, the Democratic establishment increasingly praises Mensch for her work.
Former President Barack Obama’s Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe tweeted Mensch’s
embarrassing recent interview with BBC


observer.com...


twitter.com...


In any case, in closing:
www.abovetopsecret.com...


edit on 25-3-2017 by burntheships because: (no reason given)


+2 more 
posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:07 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships




Wiretap


I see your wiretap, and raise Manafort.



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: Phage

I gave you two stars though. I felt bad for your dislexical.


Wait.

Which we did you think I was talking about?



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

You might actually link to the other one, perhaps do some kind of summary with highlights from the 'work' so far? This was lazy OP.



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:10 AM
link   
a reply to: tigertatzen

There is some good stuff there Tat, but it's the muddiest of all mud pits, so you have to be in the mood for some mud wrestling. I prefer jello wrestling myself.




posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:11 AM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
You can use the other if you so desire.

(Psst. I'm not sure a mod actually told the OP to do this.)



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Anyone ever heard of statute of limitations?
Isn't that 7 years?



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:17 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Depends upon the alleged crime.

But since the FBI investigation would seem to be based on intelligence concerning the Trump campaign it would seem that the statute(s) may not apply.

edit on 3/25/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

I see your wiretap, and raise Manafort.


Ante up.




posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:28 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Next week.

Unless Nunes does something stupid. Again.



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Oh the campaign eh?
Same one clapper cleared of collusion and crime recently?



posted on Mar, 25 2017 @ 01:31 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

I didn't know Clapper could clear anyone of anything.

Tell me, what is his title?


edit on 3/25/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join