It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mr President...All you have to do is say the word

page: 7
31
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 05:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: WilliamtheResolute
a reply to: Milehigh

Is that you Josh Earnest? I've been reading your inarticulate posts for a couple of days and well...........




Believe in your own delusions if you want but it doesnt change the fact that the USA could deal with north korea in a week if it was total war.




posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 05:46 PM
link   
a reply to: seagull

I think there will be a war. A true war. We're in a soft social civil war now, but it'll heat up.

I, like millions of others, will just watch as our nation implodes.

I wonder who will win.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 05:47 PM
link   
a reply to: whatsecret

He sounds like your typical white supremacist who's waiting for any excuse to go kill people who he thinks are a problem. They all sound just like this guy.
Same speech patterns and everything.
Hell they even have the same decorator too by the looks of it.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 05:48 PM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66

Meh. Whatever makes you feel better. When it comes to Constitutional law, "mincing words" matters. There is no duty to defend or protect a President. Nobody swears fealty to the President or the Office of the President. It's sworn to the Constitution. Even Secret Service agents on The Detail are protecting the office of the President rather than the President himself.

You're talking specifics, I'm talking abstract concepts. Either way, a whole lot of things would have to line up before the military would be mobilized to defend the White House.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 05:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Sure...in context...city dwellers buy finished goods..does that need the new york times to substantiate?

Ignorant



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 05:52 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Hey...love to have a drink with you at Pok pok in May



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 05:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: starwarsisreal
a reply to: FamCore

Well if Trump got impeached or otherwise, I'm pretty sure a lot of people will be up in arms.


Impeached...NO. Assassinated...YES.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 05:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Milehigh

originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: whatsecret

i have a word for this dude

dickhead



That any militia think they can even hold the mighty power of the United States of America is laughanle.



And our army would stop them in a day.


Assuming the military opposes them?



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 05:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: DBCowboy

Hey...love to have a drink with you at Pok pok in May


June's the get-together!



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 05:59 PM
link   
a reply to: jimmyx

a reply to: TinySickTears

a reply to: Swills

I am not advocating violence. My point is whatever happened to Trump might result to a spark.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 06:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: Milehigh

Hmm really? How long have we been chasing rag tag half trained ISIS?

Im not stating for or against...but good ol boys in the fly over are HIGHLY trained


Agreed the US military has failed against a bunch of religious nutters in old toyotas so they probably wouldn't beat good old boys in pick up trucks or the folks from the movies Deliverence and Southern Comfort



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 06:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Teikiatsu

Of course they will. Soldiers have familiesl and friends who are mostly civilians. Perhaps some lonely soldiers with a taste for blood will join them and desert the army.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 06:02 PM
link   
a reply to: manuelram16

They are?

Really? Where?



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 06:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: Shamrock6

Sure...in context...city dwellers buy finished goods..does that need the new york times to substantiate?

Ignorant


That's not what you said, you claimed it's a fact that 250 million people are incapable of providing for themselves. Since you claimed it's a fact, that means you can source your claim for us.

As loathe as I am to interrupt your ego jerk session, I'm still waiting on that source. At least you recognize you're ignorant, though. That's a start.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 06:06 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

If, and I surely do hope it's an if, that should ever come to pass, I'm going to do absolutely nothing.

I'm done trying to convince people that working together would be better, but they seem to not want to, so f' em. Just stay the Hell outta my back yard, and pick up after yourselves.

Try to take what belongs to me in the process of your little (your--the royal your) excursion into madness, you'll bleed first, but leave me and mine alone, and we'll get along fine.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 06:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Wrong..i was responding to one of your folks numbers



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 06:09 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

I know, but ill be there for my 50th in May...love to meet you



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 06:09 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueJacket

Riiiight. I don't see anybody else going on about how inept 250 million people are, just you.

Just so long as we're all on the same page that you're blowing smoke and pretending it's a fact, though. All good.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Buddy im not picking a fight..i dont see anyone..even in the country living off the land, but very few.

Enjoy your ego trip



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 06:14 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueJacket

Thanks for the well wishes. Very meaningful, coming from the guy dismissing 250 million folks he's never met.

You can resume your "ego" stroking now.




top topics



 
31
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join