It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sara Carter Is Back And She Lets On That Trump Wiretap Traces To The top

page: 10
86
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 12:08 PM
link   
a reply to: rickymouse

Delusional commentary about me is not evidence either.




posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 12:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: rickymouse

Delusional commentary about me is not evidence either.


You won't accept any evidence you believe is not relevant. It is based on your beliefs or desires. The evidence that you state is not acceptable either, show me some evidence that cannot be challenged, it is evident that trumps "wiretapped" in parenthesis meant he was under surveillance. The word wiretapping is actually broad form in concept. Obama admitted in his initial statement he did not interfere with investigations by the justice department or the intelligence department, basically meaning he knew of the investigation. But he denied ordering the Surveillance. Trump saying Obama directly ordered it is the only mistake he made.

I don't back Trump at all, I do back the office of the president of the united states though, and whatever deceitful idiot always occupies it.



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 12:28 PM
link   
a reply to: rickymouse

Even more irrational prattling.

You for called on posting an infotainment opinion piece as evidence.

Apparently you have no argument to deal with aside from your opinions about "me."

If I see something on topic from you I'll respond.



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 12:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Yet you haven't responded to my answer to your question... hmmm...



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 12:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

What are you talking about?

Also FISA warrants ... what was I incorrect about?

Also, evidence of Obama's wiretaps?



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 12:50 PM
link   



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 12:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Gryphon66



Are they not issued by the FISA court?


No, they don't have to be. The president can authorize them for up to one year, with no court approval.



Who are they issued against?


Foreigners OR American's where "probable cause" exists that they are agents of a foreign power.

I put probable cause in quotations because it's not really required. The standard is so low it's almost non-existent.


Okay.

Did the President issue authrorization for a FISA warrant or FISA surveillance?

Do you have any meaningful information about the FISA warrants or not? Because I say you don't.

Prove me wrong.


edit on 26-3-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Speling



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66



Did the President issue authrorization for a FISA warrant or FISA surveillance?


Do you have evidence that he didn't?



Do you have any meaningful information about the FISA warrants or not?


Yes, they existed. That's all I can confirm to you.



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 01:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Good.

No evidence to support any variation on Trumps tweets.

Thanks.



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 01:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Actually, it supports pretty much his entire story. But you can't see that because you are too partisan. Is what it is.

Thanks.



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 01:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Gryphon66

Actually, it supports pretty much his entire story. But you can't see that because you are too partisan. Is what it is.

Thanks.


The total lack of any evidence supports this story?

The words of a zealot ... a profession of faith.

/shrug



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 02:16 PM
link   
It's amazing the mountain of evidence we now have to validate President Trump's initial charge of Obama Regime wiretapping of Planet Trump.

Ironically, there is ZERO evidence that the Trump Campaign conspired with "the Russians" to affect the outcome of the election.

I would love to see Obama prosecuted for something, anything, to bring some measure of justice to the treason he committed upon this constitutional republic, but I doubt anything will happen. He's hiding in Tahiti by himself, 90 minutes away from non-extradition Vanuatu. Where's Big Mike? The adopted Moroccan chirruns...? No one knows...

And the 800 lb. gorilla in the room? Reporter James Rosen has reported that he has the "smoking gun" tying the Obama Syndicate to the wiretapping of Team Trump. That story is set to break in the coming week.

This is a truly amazing turn of events, folks!

Stay tuned...



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: SBMcG




It's amazing the mountain of evidence we now have to validate President Trump's initial charge of Obama Regime wiretapping of Planet Trump.

Where? I have seen no such evidence.
Have you?


edit on 3/26/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 02:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: SBMcG
It's amazing the mountain of evidence we now have to validate President Trump's initial charge of Obama Regime wiretapping of Planet Trump.

You can't just say this and it be magically true.



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 02:24 PM
link   
You know ... we all have our styles of expression. We all have our peccadillos, our contrivances and our bete noires.

But seriously, I am continually amazed that anyone expects to be taken seriously when their language is as florid and over-the-top (not to mention irrational, emotion-laden and often self-contradictory) as some of our posters here.

There's zero evidence at the moment that President Obama did anything to surveill Trump.

There's plenty of evidence that there are investigations into several Trump operatives.

There's plenty of evidence that the Russian government hacked the DNC and acted to influence our General Election.

On the list of Trump operatives, at this point, we have to include Rep. Nunes who has totally discredited himself as the leader of this investigation.

THAT'S the summary of the evidence we have now.
edit on 26-3-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SBMcG




It's amazing the mountain of evidence we now have to validate President Trump's initial charge of Obama Regime wiretapping of Planet Trump.

Where? I have seen no such evidence.
Have you?



If I didn't know any better I would think that you truly are a two-dimensional thinker. That post was obviously intended to counter in like measure the one it followed.

That being said, are you seriously asking for "evidence" of Obama Regime spying on Trump? Have you followed this thread?

You are completely aware of the reporting, the testimony of Nunes, and the fact that at least one phone conversation at Trump Tower (Flynn) was not only "wiretapped", but illegally disseminated.

Your schtick of asking for evidence you know exists and then proceed to demand even more empiric evidence that you know is not available to civilians gets old.

And I'm not the only one who feels that way...



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 02:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: SBMcG
It's amazing the mountain of evidence we now have to validate President Trump's initial charge of Obama Regime wiretapping of Planet Trump.

You can't just say this and it be magically true.


No magic needed. The reporting and evidence is clear -- Team Trump was "wiretapped". Obama has a long history of wiretapping and spying on his political opponents and even members of the press (James Rosen, AP reporters).

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Nunes has confirmed that there was surveillance and illegal activity in the unmasking of the names of Americans being "wiretapped".

Representative Peter King has also said that President Trump is correct in his claims.

Personally, I hope Obama is brought to justice for his numerous crimes, but doubt this one will stick to him.
edit on 26-3-2017 by SBMcG because: Obama is going to SuperMax.



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: SBMcG

You are completely aware of the reporting, the testimony of Nunes, and the fact that at least one phone conversation at Trump Tower (Flynn) was not only "wiretapped", but illegally disseminated.


Seems to me that Nunes himself said that the information he says he saw did not indicate that Trump (or associates) were being monitored.


Was Trump Tower being monitored? Is that where Flynn was when the conversation between him and the Russian was recorded?

By "illegally disseminated", you mean leaked to the press. Right? Yes, that was illegal.





edit on 3/26/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 02:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Exactly. Saying anything else is just in conflict with reality. The investigation worsens by. the. day. for Trump. Meanwhile, the investigators (all of them) have written off Trump's wiretap claim completely. Saying otherwise is just lying.



posted on Mar, 26 2017 @ 02:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

James Rosen claims to have direct evidence linking the Obama Regime to "wiretapping" of Trump.


Classified intelligence showing incidental collection of Trump team communications, purportedly seen by committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and described by him in vague terms at a bombshell Wednesday afternoon news conference, came from multiple sources, Capitol Hill sources told Fox News.


Who was president when this "wiretapping" took place -- Jimmy Carter?

It was Obama. He either knew about it or he didn't. If he didn't, that makes him even more inept than I already know him to be. If he knew about it, he either directly or passively approved it. There is no Door # 3.

Source[e ditby]edit on 26-3-2017 by SBMcG because: Obama was a miserable failure.



new topics

top topics


active topics

 
86
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join