It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Jehovah’s Witnesses Mobilize Global Response to Threat of Ban in Russia

page: 14
11
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: TheChrome

Um, I was talking about the "2 witness rule" the jw cult has to protect paedophiles.

You know? The one that's in the elders manual.


We do not protect pedophiles, and I assume that you only know about the elders manual by the internet. Pathetic. There is nothing secret about the elders manual, as everything in it is readily available in all literature published by JWs.


I never said it was secret or not available.


The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. That means you and your cult are protecting paedophiles.



I tell you what, you are irrational. That is all


I'm the irrational one because I don't follow a cult that protects paedophiles?



It was your cult that made the 2 witness rule to protect paedophiles, not me.


Broken record, and not valid


How is it not valid?

The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. It's also against the law. It's simple. I'll even give you an example.

Little Jimmy gets abused by daddy.
Little Jimmy tells someone.
Daddy says little Jimmy is not telling the truth.
Because the only witness is little Jimmy, he gets shunned and disfellowshipped.

Also, when there are allegations of child abuse, your cult deems it necessary to have a meeting, instead of reporting it straight to the authorities.

So, as I said, the jw cult protects paedophiles.


This person needs psychiatric help, and is not sound of mind.


So now you go with insults?

You can call me whatever you want, at least I don't protect paedophiles with a 2 witness rule.


Insults? You make false accusations and then talk of insults?




posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: TheChrome

No... JWs are no more or less prone to the vile tendencies of the sexually depraved than any other group.

The cultist nonsense, the fact that daring to come to my door to spread blasphemy and lies makes them no better than the heretic, Saint and virgin worshiping Catholics however, that is a problem.


We do not spread blasphemy or lies. We speak the truth.


You forgot the most important part.....

protecting paedophiles.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: TheChrome

Um, I was talking about the "2 witness rule" the jw cult has to protect paedophiles.

You know? The one that's in the elders manual.


We do not protect pedophiles, and I assume that you only know about the elders manual by the internet. Pathetic. There is nothing secret about the elders manual, as everything in it is readily available in all literature published by JWs.


I never said it was secret or not available.


The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. That means you and your cult are protecting paedophiles.



I tell you what, you are irrational. That is all


I'm the irrational one because I don't follow a cult that protects paedophiles?



It was your cult that made the 2 witness rule to protect paedophiles, not me.


Broken record, and not valid


How is it not valid?

The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. It's also against the law. It's simple. I'll even give you an example.

Little Jimmy gets abused by daddy.
Little Jimmy tells someone.
Daddy says little Jimmy is not telling the truth.
Because the only witness is little Jimmy, he gets shunned and disfellowshipped.

Also, when there are allegations of child abuse, your cult deems it necessary to have a meeting, instead of reporting it straight to the authorities.

So, as I said, the jw cult protects paedophiles.


This person needs psychiatric help, and is not sound of mind.


So now you go with insults?

You can call me whatever you want, at least I don't protect paedophiles with a 2 witness rule.


Insults? You make false accusations and then talk of insults?


False as in not true?

So the 2 witness thing doesn't exist? I guess you should tell your elders that as they were the ones who made the rule in the first place.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:08 AM
link   
a reply to: TheChrome

With respect, that is horse crap and you know it.

The originator of your belief system never met Jesus during his time walking in flesh, was born the lions share of 2000 years after Jesus ceased to walk the world in human form, and therefore knew no where near enough to start diverging away from the beliefs or instructions laid down in the Bible, which he absolutely did. He also poisoned the minds of others with his hubris and self satisfaction, such that they believed his nonsense.

But why should I continue to argue the point? I mean, you believe that Michael is Jesus, deny his oneness with God, and yet dare to speak of being some of a small few who might enter heaven? Even by cultist standards, that is deluded.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: TheChrome

Um, I was talking about the "2 witness rule" the jw cult has to protect paedophiles.

You know? The one that's in the elders manual.


We do not protect pedophiles, and I assume that you only know about the elders manual by the internet. Pathetic. There is nothing secret about the elders manual, as everything in it is readily available in all literature published by JWs.


I never said it was secret or not available.


The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. That means you and your cult are protecting paedophiles.



I tell you what, you are irrational. That is all


I'm the irrational one because I don't follow a cult that protects paedophiles?



It was your cult that made the 2 witness rule to protect paedophiles, not me.


Broken record, and not valid


How is it not valid?

The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. It's also against the law. It's simple. I'll even give you an example.

Little Jimmy gets abused by daddy.
Little Jimmy tells someone.
Daddy says little Jimmy is not telling the truth.
Because the only witness is little Jimmy, he gets shunned and disfellowshipped.

Also, when there are allegations of child abuse, your cult deems it necessary to have a meeting, instead of reporting it straight to the authorities.

So, as I said, the jw cult protects paedophiles.


This person needs psychiatric help, and is not sound of mind.


So now you go with insults?

You can call me whatever you want, at least I don't protect paedophiles with a 2 witness rule.


Insults? You make false accusations and then talk of insults?


False as in not true?

So the 2 witness thing doesn't exist? I guess you should tell your elders that as they were the ones who made the rule in the first place.


Like I said, you must be a pedophile



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:10 AM
link   
a reply to: TheChrome

Again with the insults.

I'm against peadophilia and againsty protecting it.

The jw cult is all for protecting it with the 2 witness rule.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:12 AM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Insults? I think it was you who made first the accusation, you pedophile



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:15 AM
link   
a reply to: TheChrome

I posted that the jw cult protects paedophiles with the 2 witness rule.

You're just throwing out unfounded insults.

Bit of a difference there, kiddo.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:16 AM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Oh? Unfounded? And yet you throw unfounded accusations because you are a pedophile?



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:17 AM
link   
a reply to: TheChrome

What I'm saying isn't unfounded.

The jw cult has a 2 witness rule in place that protects paedophiles.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:19 AM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Are you a bot? A psychopath? What the ?



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:25 AM
link   
a reply to: TheChrome

I'm a human being.
And one that doesn't like cults, especially ones who protect paedophiles.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:27 AM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

I love human beings, but not those who make false accusations. You know not what you are doing...

"You must not testify falsely as a witness against your fellowman" - Exodus 20:16

edit on 11-4-2017 by TheChrome because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheChrome
a reply to: TerryDon79

I love human beings, but not those who make false accusations.


I've not made any false accusations.

Answer me this...
Does the jw cult have a 2 witness rule or not, when it comes to child abuse?



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome
a reply to: TerryDon79

I love human beings, but not those who make false accusations.


I've not made any false accusations.

Answer me this...
Does the jw cult have a 2 witness rule or not, when it comes to child abuse?


Would you prefer the one witness rule? Where a person says I didn't do it? The one witness rule is great for pedophiles like yourself.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome
a reply to: TerryDon79

I love human beings, but not those who make false accusations.


I've not made any false accusations.

Answer me this...
Does the jw cult have a 2 witness rule or not, when it comes to child abuse?


Would you prefer the one witness rule? Where a person says I didn't do it?

I would prefer that cults didn't make up rules that protect paedophiles.


The one witness rule is great for pedophiles like yourself.

The one witness rule would actually be very bad for paedophiles. And stop with the insults, it's not helping your (lack of) arguement.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:39 AM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

I am not insulting anyone, I am only mirroring your comments. You best figure out your comments because I will continue to mirror your comments. I will not back down until you get your mind right.
edit on 11-4-2017 by TheChrome because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheChrome
a reply to: TerryDon79

I am not insulting anyone, I am only mirroring you comments. You best figure out your comments because I will continue to mirror your comments. I will not back down until you get your mind right.


Show me where I called you a paedophile.

You can't, therefore you comments aren't mirroring mine.

You're just upset because your cult got called out on protecting paedophiles and you can't counter the argument.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:44 AM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

No, my faith (Not cult) does not approve of the garbage that spews out of your mouth. I am done. I hope that you will gain some sort of logic in you future.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheChrome
a reply to: TerryDon79

No, my faith (Not cult) does not approve of the garbage that spews out of your mouth.

The 2 witness rule of your cult says otherwise.


I am done.

You didn't even get started with proving what I said was wrong, but you're done? Just goes to show that you don't have a counter argument and were just here to throw out insults.


I hope that you will gain some sort of logic in you future.

My logic tells me not to join cults. Especially ones that cover up and allow paedophiles.




top topics



 
11
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join