It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Jehovah’s Witnesses Mobilize Global Response to Threat of Ban in Russia

page: 13
11
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:13 AM
link   
a reply to: TheChrome

Um, I was talking about the "2 witness rule" the jw cult has to protect paedophiles.

You know? The one that's in the elders manual.




posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: TheChrome

Um, I was talking about the "2 witness rule" the jw cult has to protect paedophiles.

You know? The one that's in the elders manual.


We do not protect pedophiles, and I assume that you only know about the elders manual by the internet. Pathetic. There is nothing secret about the elders manual, as everything in it is readily available in all literature published by JWs.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: TheChrome

Um, I was talking about the "2 witness rule" the jw cult has to protect paedophiles.

You know? The one that's in the elders manual.


We do not protect pedophiles, and I assume that you only know about the elders manual by the internet. Pathetic. There is nothing secret about the elders manual, as everything in it is readily available in all literature published by JWs.


I never said it was secret or not available.

The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. That means you and your cult are protecting paedophiles.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: TheChrome

Um, I was talking about the "2 witness rule" the jw cult has to protect paedophiles.

You know? The one that's in the elders manual.


We do not protect pedophiles, and I assume that you only know about the elders manual by the internet. Pathetic. There is nothing secret about the elders manual, as everything in it is readily available in all literature published by JWs.


I never said it was secret or not available.


The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. That means you and your cult are protecting paedophiles.



I tell you what, you are irrational. That is all. It is only reasonable that there should be 2 witnesses in any event, one person could be a liar. I kinda think you are a liar, so wouldn't it be reasonable to have a second witness?
edit on 11-4-2017 by TheChrome because: (no reason given)

edit on 11-4-2017 by TheChrome because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: TheChrome

Um, I was talking about the "2 witness rule" the jw cult has to protect paedophiles.

You know? The one that's in the elders manual.


We do not protect pedophiles, and I assume that you only know about the elders manual by the internet. Pathetic. There is nothing secret about the elders manual, as everything in it is readily available in all literature published by JWs.


I never said it was secret or not available.


The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. That means you and your cult are protecting paedophiles.



I tell you what, you are irrational. That is all


I'm the irrational one because I don't follow a cult that protects paedophiles?

It was your cult that made the 2 witness rule to protect paedophiles, not me.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: TheChrome

Um, I was talking about the "2 witness rule" the jw cult has to protect paedophiles.

You know? The one that's in the elders manual.


We do not protect pedophiles, and I assume that you only know about the elders manual by the internet. Pathetic. There is nothing secret about the elders manual, as everything in it is readily available in all literature published by JWs.


I never said it was secret or not available.


The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. That means you and your cult are protecting paedophiles.



I tell you what, you are irrational. That is all


I'm the irrational one because I don't follow a cult that protects paedophiles?



It was your cult that made the 2 witness rule to protect paedophiles, not me.


Broken record, and not valid
edit on 11-4-2017 by TheChrome because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:35 AM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Are you a pedophile? Is that why you are so fixated on this?



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: TheChrome

Um, I was talking about the "2 witness rule" the jw cult has to protect paedophiles.

You know? The one that's in the elders manual.


We do not protect pedophiles, and I assume that you only know about the elders manual by the internet. Pathetic. There is nothing secret about the elders manual, as everything in it is readily available in all literature published by JWs.


I never said it was secret or not available.


The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. That means you and your cult are protecting paedophiles.



I tell you what, you are irrational. That is all


I'm the irrational one because I don't follow a cult that protects paedophiles?



It was your cult that made the 2 witness rule to protect paedophiles, not me.


Broken record, and not valid


How is it not valid?

The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. It's also against the law. It's simple. I'll even give you an example.

Little Jimmy gets abused by daddy.
Little Jimmy tells someone.
Daddy says little Jimmy is not telling the truth.
Because the only witness is little Jimmy, he gets shunned and disfellowshipped.

Also, when there are allegations of child abuse, your cult deems it necessary to have a meeting, instead of reporting it straight to the authorities.

So, as I said, the jw cult protects paedophiles.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheChrome
a reply to: TerryDon79

Are you a pedophile? Is that why you are so fixated on this?


No and I don't protect them.

Unlike the jw cult, who do.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome
a reply to: TerryDon79

Are you a pedophile? Is that why you are so fixated on this?


No and I don't protect them.

Unlike the jw cult, who do.


You are misguided. JWs do not protect them You are out of line and all shall know that



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome
a reply to: TerryDon79

Are you a pedophile? Is that why you are so fixated on this?


No and I don't protect them.

Unlike the jw cult, who do.


You are misguided. JWs do not protect them You are out of line and all shall know that


If they didn't protect them, they would 1, report it straight to the authorities and 2, not make up a rule to protect them.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome
a reply to: TerryDon79

Are you a pedophile? Is that why you are so fixated on this?


No and I don't protect them.

Unlike the jw cult, who do.


You are misguided. JWs do not protect them You are out of line and all shall know that


If they didn't protect them, they would 1, report it straight to the authorities and 2, not make up a rule to protect them.


Obviously you did not read my previous comments. The only case I know of abuse was reported and the individual went to jail You have some sort of wacko perverted concept of JW's which I can assure you is unwarranted and probably irrational. I will not tolerate such garbage.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome
a reply to: TerryDon79

Are you a pedophile? Is that why you are so fixated on this?


No and I don't protect them.

Unlike the jw cult, who do.


You are misguided. JWs do not protect them You are out of line and all shall know that


If they didn't protect them, they would 1, report it straight to the authorities and 2, not make up a rule to protect them.


Obviously you did not read my previous comments. The only case I know of abuse was reported and the individual went to jail You have some sort of wacko perverted concept of JW's which I can assure you is unwarranted and probably irrational.

You didn't look very hard.



I will not tolerate such garbage.

What are you going to do? Get some fairy tale to smite me? LOL



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome
a reply to: TerryDon79

Are you a pedophile? Is that why you are so fixated on this?


No and I don't protect them.

Unlike the jw cult, who do.


You are misguided. JWs do not protect them You are out of line and all shall know that


If they didn't protect them, they would 1, report it straight to the authorities and 2, not make up a rule to protect them.


This person does not know what they are talking about. His accusations are false.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:57 AM
link   
a reply to: TheChrome

i never stated or even implied that " laziness = sound medicine "

so please stop making crap up - its undignified

and further your " study " if also flawed - as it involves ONLY JWs as the " no transfusions group " - which raises issues - as they are ALL none smokers // non drinkers // non drug [ recreational ] users

do you have the balls to post the stats for JW survival // recover times /// outcomes for traumatic injury admissions // surguries ???

and lastly - you avoid actually answering the question i asked - [ is this a sign of your cultish dishonesty ? ] - and the " study " - plots < 500 JWs against 85000 " others " - how many of the 85k could be treated to the same standard as JWs demand - for the same budget // rescources ???



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:58 AM
link   
a reply to: TheChrome

No... JWs are no more or less prone to the vile tendencies of the sexually depraved than any other group.

The cultist nonsense, the fact that daring to come to my door to spread blasphemy and lies makes them no better than the heretic, Saint and virgin worshiping Catholics however, that is a problem.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: TheChrome

Um, I was talking about the "2 witness rule" the jw cult has to protect paedophiles.

You know? The one that's in the elders manual.


We do not protect pedophiles, and I assume that you only know about the elders manual by the internet. Pathetic. There is nothing secret about the elders manual, as everything in it is readily available in all literature published by JWs.


I never said it was secret or not available.


The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. That means you and your cult are protecting paedophiles.



I tell you what, you are irrational. That is all


I'm the irrational one because I don't follow a cult that protects paedophiles?



It was your cult that made the 2 witness rule to protect paedophiles, not me.


Broken record, and not valid


How is it not valid?

The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. It's also against the law. It's simple. I'll even give you an example.

Little Jimmy gets abused by daddy.
Little Jimmy tells someone.
Daddy says little Jimmy is not telling the truth.
Because the only witness is little Jimmy, he gets shunned and disfellowshipped.

Also, when there are allegations of child abuse, your cult deems it necessary to have a meeting, instead of reporting it straight to the authorities.

So, as I said, the jw cult protects paedophiles.


This person needs psychiatric help, and is not sound of mind.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 03:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome
a reply to: TerryDon79

Are you a pedophile? Is that why you are so fixated on this?


No and I don't protect them.

Unlike the jw cult, who do.


You are misguided. JWs do not protect them You are out of line and all shall know that


If they didn't protect them, they would 1, report it straight to the authorities and 2, not make up a rule to protect them.


This person does not know what they are talking about. His accusations are false.


ROFL!

Well done! I feel so put in my place LOL.

It's not my fault that the jw cult has put in a 2 witness rule to protect paedophiles. Try taking it up with them instead of condoning it.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: TheChrome

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: TheChrome

Um, I was talking about the "2 witness rule" the jw cult has to protect paedophiles.

You know? The one that's in the elders manual.


We do not protect pedophiles, and I assume that you only know about the elders manual by the internet. Pathetic. There is nothing secret about the elders manual, as everything in it is readily available in all literature published by JWs.


I never said it was secret or not available.


The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. That means you and your cult are protecting paedophiles.



I tell you what, you are irrational. That is all


I'm the irrational one because I don't follow a cult that protects paedophiles?



It was your cult that made the 2 witness rule to protect paedophiles, not me.


Broken record, and not valid


How is it not valid?

The 2 witness rule protects paedophiles. It's also against the law. It's simple. I'll even give you an example.

Little Jimmy gets abused by daddy.
Little Jimmy tells someone.
Daddy says little Jimmy is not telling the truth.
Because the only witness is little Jimmy, he gets shunned and disfellowshipped.

Also, when there are allegations of child abuse, your cult deems it necessary to have a meeting, instead of reporting it straight to the authorities.

So, as I said, the jw cult protects paedophiles.


This person needs psychiatric help, and is not sound of mind.


So now you go with insults?

You can call me whatever you want, at least I don't protect paedophiles with a 2 witness rule.



posted on Apr, 11 2017 @ 04:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: TheChrome

No... JWs are no more or less prone to the vile tendencies of the sexually depraved than any other group.

The cultist nonsense, the fact that daring to come to my door to spread blasphemy and lies makes them no better than the heretic, Saint and virgin worshiping Catholics however, that is a problem.


We do not spread blasphemy or lies. We speak the truth.



new topics




 
11
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join