It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheAlleghenyGentleman
a reply to: RobertConrad
These things are not for you to know. You ask the wrong questions to begin with.
See, that's why I hate religions. That is such a bullsh*t answer.
Have fun passing out your flyers in heaven when I'm rocking out with the punk rockers in hell.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: RobertConrad
Charles Russel believed the "time of the end" in Daniel 12 ran from 1799 to 1914, that Christ had returned to earth in 1874, began his reign in 1878 and that from that date the anointed had been resurrected to heaven at their death. He initially taught that Armageddon had begun in 1874, which would culminate in worldwide anarchy and the overthrow of all political rulership in 1914 .
Rutherford's term as president was marked by a succession of changes to doctrines, with many of Russell's teachings altered or abandoned and many new teachings introduced. The Finished Mystery declared that God would destroy churches "wholesale" and church members by the millions in 1918,[127] and that all earthly governments would be destroyed in 1920, resulting in anarchy.
WHY WOULD YOU FOLLOW THE BELIEFS OF A CRAZY CULTISTS?
DID YOU NOT NOTICE THE WORLD DID NOT END?
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: RobertConrad
I know you're not allowed to speak to me. It's one of your silly cults rules.
Anyone who talks bad about the jw cult has to be ignored.
I'll still be around though and I'll very likely be posting a lot more links.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: RobertConrad
Why let the children die instead of giving them a blood transfusion?
Thats just sickening.
Can anyone justify this?
originally posted by: Phage
Religious freedom is important.
But so is my privacy. Why do Witnesses think it's ok to come through my gate, into my yard, when they don't know me?
originally posted by: TheChrome
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: RobertConrad
Why let the children die instead of giving them a blood transfusion?
Thats just sickening.
Can anyone justify this?
Yes, they can. Bloodless surgery is safer, and is line with God's laws. Get educated:
Jehovah's Witnesses Recover Best From Surgery
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: TheChrome
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: RobertConrad
Why let the children die instead of giving them a blood transfusion?
Thats just sickening.
Can anyone justify this?
Yes, they can. Bloodless surgery is safer, and is line with God's laws. Get educated:
Jehovah's Witnesses Recover Best From Surgery
Not always an option.
Your religious beliefs kills children.
But children die all the time so it's ok.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: TheChrome
so the patients that get a more :
costly
labour intensive
complex
time consuming
treatment - that also requires extensive pre planning have a better prognosis for recovery ?
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: TheChrome
www.krev.info...
The religion is not still refusing blood transfusions for children?
originally posted by: TheChrome
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: TheChrome
www.krev.info...
The religion is not still refusing blood transfusions for children?
I was taken by court order from my parents when I was a child and given a blood transfusion. Your arguments are not valid. I was raped by blood
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: TheChrome
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: TheChrome
www.krev.info...
The religion is not still refusing blood transfusions for children?
I was taken by court order from my parents when I was a child and given a blood transfusion. Your arguments are not valid. I was raped by blood
You are so not getting into heaven, you are screwed now.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: TheChrome
I already posted links showing what the jw cult leaders have said and what internal "laws" they have made to protect child abusers. The whole "2 witnesses" for an abuse to even be looked at.
But I guess you forgot about that.