It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FBI has evidence of Trump campaign collusion with Russia.

page: 8
24
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 02:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

originally posted by: SeekingAlpha
He is a useful idiot just like all of the Trump supporters.


originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: SeekingAlpha

Alex Jones serves one purpose and that is making people think about things. He's a useful idiot.


Oh, I agree, Trump and his cult personify "useful idiots". The question is, useful to whom?

The Russians, for certain, we already know this. But also far-right white supremacists have benefited greatly, and so has big business. But the Russians, for certain. They hit the lottery with Trump and his trainwreck.


Oh my days... Wtf did the first black POTUS do for the black communities of America?

I'll answer that for you because it's a no Brainer. HE DID NOTHING!!!!



WRONG! Obamaphones...Easier access to Welfare $$$...Increase eligibility for Medicaid...PRIDE.


Obamaphone wasn't his program really, he may have expanded upon it, but it's roots go further back.




posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 02:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

No, not all of his supporters are white supremacists. But an overwhelming number of white supremacists not only supported him, but loudly endorsed him, and he did not reject nor condemn them. He accepted their support. At the very least, Trump is not bothered by white supremacist beliefs that much. and Ive seen few, if any of his supporters, condemn them.

His supporters are most definitely a band of fools, though.

As to the "Crap with Russia", you are damned right I believe it, because there is a mountain of evidence coming from multiple sources to back it up, from multiple intelligence agencies inside and outside the U.S. who traditionally do not get along otherwise. Yet they all agree on this, and have provided evidence. It's obvious to everyone outside the Trump cult who hasn't drunk the kool-aid.

And what, if anything, does Obama have to do with this discussion? You are aware he ceased to be the president on January 20th, right? That's a peculiar obsession you people have with Obama. What do Obamas accomplishments, or lack thereof, have to do with Trump and his people colluding with Russia? Is that seriously the best you can do?





You sound like a real gem. Trump supporters racist .. got it .. Mountains of evidence.. got it .. Magical Sources.. got it.. Outside IC people helping... got it..

Wow you just basically won the this whole discussion. Might as well close up ATS.. you win.

Lol.

Trump supporters are not racists, that's like me saying Democrat supporters are communist or La Raza
There has been zero evidence provided, on the flip side multiple Obama sources even Dems have said there is Zero evidence of collusion.
Out side IC helping? you mean like the Brits ? or you mean like globalists?
What evidence have they provided ? that's right ZERO. Show us please
And Obama, Lynch and its really looking like Comey have everything to do with this

You say Trump supporters are fools yet every point of your post screams triggered lies generalization and speculation. The only fool here appears to be YOU.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 03:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf




“I disavow and condemn them,” Trump said Tuesday during a wide-ranging interview with staff members of The New York Times.

www.salon.com...


Long ago debunked. A little light reading should help your ignorance.


Note this is AFTER he got elected. He didn't disavow them that much, seeing how he chose at least one for high ranking positions in his cabinet.

Perhaps this should help your own ignorance:

www.salon.com...






Where is this evidence. I would like to see it and am sure the FBI would like to as well.


www.reuters.com...
www.reuters.com...
www.businessinsider.com...
www.politifact.com...

The FBI is only the newst player in the investigations.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 03:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf




He didn't disavow them that much

....What!??!

You do know what disavow means correct?

I didn't ask for proof of investigations, I asked for evidence that you claimed is known.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 03:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

White supremacist=Trump supporters. That's pretty much what you said before. Obama, first black prez did nothing for black people. Sounds like a white supremacist to me.


No, that's what you READ, because clearly, you lack reading comprehension. From my original post:




The Russians, for certain, we already know this. But also far-right white supremacists have benefited greatly, and so has big business. But the Russians, for certain. They hit the lottery with Trump and his trainwreck.


Clearly, I stated that white supremacists have greatly benefited from Trump's election and his cult of useful idiots. Nowhere does it state that all Trump supporters are white supremacists. Only that the major White nationalist groups and their white supremacist goons not only overwhelmingly voiced their support for Trump, but continue to approve of his choices as president.

www.google.com...=stormfront+donald+trump&*
www.washingtonpost.com... d276ce5081
www.businessinsider.com...

Clearly, white supremacists strongly support and favor Trump and his choices. But nowhere did I say all Trump supporters are racists.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 03:20 AM
link   
a reply to: WhereAreTheGoodguys

And we have another winner lacking basic reading comprehension skills. Sigh.

I guess I should get used to this in Trump's America.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 03:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

originally posted by: SeekingAlpha
He is a useful idiot just like all of the Trump supporters.


originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: SeekingAlpha

Alex Jones serves one purpose and that is making people think about things. He's a useful idiot.


Oh, I agree, Trump and his cult personify "useful idiots". The question is, useful to whom?

The Russians, for certain, we already know this. But also far-right white supremacists have benefited greatly, and so has big business. But the Russians, for certain. They hit the lottery with Trump and his trainwreck.


Oh my days... Wtf did the first black POTUS do for the black communities of America?

I'll answer that for you because it's a no Brainer. HE DID NOTHING!!!!



WRONG! Obamaphones...Easier access to Welfare $$$...Increase eligibility for Medicaid...PRIDE.


Obamaphone wasn't his program really, he may have expanded upon it, but it's roots go further back.



Obamaphones actually were started by Bush, who expanded the program, whose roots predate Bush.

www.factcheck.org...

Has anyone actually seen an obamaphone? Clearly, people who babble on about Obamaphones don't know what the hell they are talking about, as usual. I used to work as a caregiver, and most of the people I took care of were on public assistance and disability. They had their Obamaphones, which were basically 8 year old cheap little basic devices without cameras or capabilities beyond basic calling and primitive texting. The recipient got 250 minutes a month on their phone. This was for the purpose of having basic communications for doctor and social worker appointments. They had the option of this or a traditional landline. Since land lines are going the way of the dinosaur and used mainly by the elderly, people are choosing the cellphone instead.

Its an issue of times and technology.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 05:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ColdWisdom

Obama could have "suggested" that Trump be wiretapped.

It's not an order then.


Yea and considering they were SURE Hilary would be the next President there would have been nothing to worry about.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 05:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

This Russia stuff was going on long before the election. You just chose to ignore it cause "Hillary is teh Evilz1!1!111".



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 07:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: FauxMulder

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ColdWisdom

Obama could have "suggested" that Trump be wiretapped.

It's not an order then.


Yea and considering they were SURE Hilary would be the next President there would have been nothing to worry about.



Could have been the fact there was already a very concrete quid quo pro between trump and Russia . So the FBI decided they. should prob investigate....

Because when you have a forien adversary dropping counter intel on trumps political opponent. Then all this advisors start having shady Russian meetings... then he changes the GOP platform to pro Russian..


Doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to think we should prob take a look



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 07:32 AM
link   
All of this, "He colluded with Russia!" and "Trump was wiretapped!" is all a distraction.
Probably so nobody analyzes about the american health care act.

It's all a McRib...



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 07:44 AM
link   
Well considering that the FBI like to Im personate other things, who's to say they didn't impersonate being the Russians. It's not the first time either or a "singular" occurrence.

What I found most telling yesterday watching the NEWS, Adam Schiff (D) stated that the Documents Devin Nunes (R) reported on, "Were masked" but they had not been "seen by the intelligence committee".

How would he know that fact?

As Nunes stated, "they had been widely disseminated". He also stated these were not from the FBI.

Something YUGE is going on but we "the little people" are just now getting info on it, I think it has to do with how much President Trump is hated by the Powers that be.



edit on 23-3-2017 by thedigirati because: Clarity



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 08:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

Are you upset he only has one?,when the Obama Administration had all sorts of racist groups,very public evident,BLM,radical Muslim,but just like a liberal it was ok then,a racist is in the eye of a beer holder,with this kind of thought everyone is a racist



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Oldtimer2
a reply to: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

Are you upset he only has one?,when the Obama Administration had all sorts of racist groups,very public evident,BLM,radical Muslim,but just like a liberal it was ok then,a racist is in the eye of a beer holder,with this kind of thought everyone is a racist


He has a lot more than one. Several white nationalist groups fully support him.

Once again, you pointlessly deflect to Obama when Trump's lack of clothing is pointed out, despite that it has no bearing on this conversation. Who or whatever Obama associated himself with, he is history now. He and his cabinet are gone. Your entire statement makes zero sense.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:27 AM
link   
a reply to: thedigirati


I think it has to do with how much President Trump is hated by the Powers that be.


OR, how much HE hates the powers that be, because he desperately wants to BE the powers that be.
That works both ways.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vdogg
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

This Russia stuff was going on long before the election. You just chose to ignore it cause "Hillary is teh Evilz1!1!111".


Yes it was, and Comey knew it and never mentioned it. Yet he can make unsubstantiated claims about Clinton days before the election, casting all manner of aspersions on her integrity.

Congress should be demanding that he step down.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vdogg
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

This Russia stuff was going on long before the election. You just chose to ignore it cause "Hillary is teh Evilz1!1!111".


Yep.

time.com...
www.washingtonpost.com...
abcnews.go.com...
www.newsweek.com...



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:51 AM
link   
a reply to: JinMI


The news is fake when it admits in the source article that the headline reported is untrue. But hey, continue the Trump bash.


The news is only fake when it affects your worshipping idol Trump. How many blatant lies does this guy have to be caught in until you people come to your senses! There comes a time where you need to step back and face reality. Trump is being bashed not because they don't like some of his stance on issues, it's what comes out of the horses mouth and his numerous lies that causes his own demise! For the amount of attacks we all have laid on Obama and Clinton for lying and criminal behavior, Trump's moral behavior, business practices and pathological lying most certainly doesn't take a back seat!! I don't know about you, but I like my politicians to be honest, intelligent and professional. We have enough liars and self-serving politicians on both political sides.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 09:54 AM
link   
Evidence is something presented to a court...Until that is done on either side everything posted is conjecture and assumptions.

Even Trump is innocent until proven guilty...If it worked for Clinton that way it should work for him that way.



posted on Mar, 23 2017 @ 10:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: GuidedKill
Evidence is something presented to a court...Until that is done on either side everything posted is conjecture and assumptions.

Even Trump is innocent until proven guilty...If it worked for Clinton that way it should work for him that way.



Was hillary considered innocent until proven guilty lol?!?!

I have personally watched even mainstream conservative hosts and commenters accuse her from everything from murder to running a pedo ring to being an inter dimensional child rapist...

There is zero evidence of any of that..

With trump there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence JUST IN THE PUBLIC RECORD!! Let alone what the FBI might have...

I can't think of any conspiracy in a decade where almost all of the quid pro quo was on display for all to see.

For instance "sandyhook was for gun control", but there was never any gun control..

With this it's "trump traded the dnc leak for lifted sanctions and ukraine" is the conspiracy and Flynn told Russia he would lift sanctions and the ONLY change to the GOP platform was that we wouldn't give weapons to Ukraine..

Conspiracy theories almost never come that clean..

At some point that is the logical conclusion, not the hairbrained conspiracy theory.



new topics




 
24
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join