It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: rickymouse
Absolutely. CNN is not alone in this tactic. Lately it seems if not most are utilizing it and pushing the divide. Go team, not facts.
Funny that this practice is not considered treason because they are attempting to divide the citizens of the country and possibly their actions could promote conflict within our society.
Funny that you never made a peep about the media dividing the country when it was Fox news.
Not funny ha ha, either.
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: ColdWisdom
Direct from a Jackasses Mouth .........
" House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes did not rule out Senior Obama administration officials being involved in “incidental” communications of President Donald Trump’s transition team that were “widely disseminated.”
When asked by Breitbart News if he could rule out any involvement of senior members of the Obama administration, Nunes replied, “No, we cannot.”
originally posted by: iTruthSeeker
Your title says they have evidence but the post seems to say things like "could", "may", "looks like" etc.
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
I wish I had some image of CNN as a tabloid on a super-market checkout shelf with a cover full of people with half them in the scream pose and the other half in the SMH pose, and the massive headline says "The Day the News Stood Still!" That is the image I get when CNN goes back into this alleged Russian Collusion and anonymous government sources bull jive.
Oh it sure makes for some entertaining arguments back and forth though.
originally posted by: angeldoll
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
This, my friends, is why i defend Trump. Because of these flat out lies.
The article doesn't lie, per se. The headline does, and the article leads you to believe it.
Anyway, more fake news from the leader in fake news
If that's true, then they are a good match for Trump, yes? Tit for tat. CNN's credibility might be poor (on this site), but it's vastly better than Donald J. Trump's (worldwide) at this juncture.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Zanti Misfit
From the article you referenced..that headline doesn't make much sense...
HEADLINE: House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes did not rule out Senior Obama administration officials being involved in “incidental” communications of President Donald Trump’s transition team that were “widely disseminated.”
Remember: half the natio is dumber than the average person you know.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: Vdogg
They may have some evidence you say?
Well make a thread when they do have some evidence.
This isn't news, it's an allegation.