It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump Wiretap Confirmed "Incidental Collection" Becomes the Scapegoat for the Lying Media

page: 7
113
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Why?




posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:27 PM
link   
Confirmed by Nunes:

Nunes said the new information did not change his assessment that the president's explosive claim that Barack Obama wiretapped his New York skyscraper was false.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Lol, I know exactly what it means. I covered that, in depth, in my FISA warrant post a couple weeks ago. You read it. You discredited that post because it implicated the Obama administration. Incidental communications are all that could be collected through a FISA warrant. They had to come at trump through a third party, that's why there were two rejections of their attempts to get a warrant. First they wanted a regular warrant and it was denied, so they went FISA and got denied again, then they removed all references to trump and finally got their warrant. That's a felony.

The fact that these incidental communications still exist (as nune's seems to have read them today) is only further testament to the failure of the Obama administrations incompetence or malpractice.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

None of this has to do with incidental collection. And you are making up events and laws while you fail to describe what incidental collection is. I promise you that Obama did nothing wrong with this investigation and no matter how much you hope otherwise, he will NOT be under any legal fire any time soon because of it.
edit on 22-3-2017 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:32 PM
link   
Possible whistleblower coming forward;

www.freedomwatchusa.org...

47 hard drives and over 600 million pages of evidence.

This will be dragged out for years...



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Here's the breaking news, tell me why the post didn't put anything about surveillance being the reason they found out about the meetings.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

If you say so.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Sostratus

WONDERFUL!



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

So has the right.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite
Source


Incidental collection
from NSA Glossary (2016)
by National Security Agency Central Security Service

When communications of a US citizen are collected while targeting a foreigner or a US person who is believed to be involved in terrorism.


In other words, all Nunes is saying is that IF Trump Tower ended up being tapped it was due to incidental collection from someone at Trump Tower contacting someone already under surveillance by the IC. And that is an if too. You seem to have failed to acknowledge that Nunes said that Trump Tower MAY have been under surveillance due to incidental collection.

All-in-all you have nothing. Though I see it isn't stopping you from declaring Obama guilty as sin (despite having zero evidence to convict him of anything).



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Because their source was leaks in the DoJ. Which they did report on.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

If they are using the true meaning of the term incidental collection then does that mean someone involved in terrorism was near Trumps team?

Could it be a protection detail logging things?



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t



You seem to have failed to acknowledge that Nunes said that Trump Tower MAY have been under surveillance due to incidental collection.


I have acknowledged he said that. But that's not ALL that he said.

What you don't seem to understand is that incidental surveillance data is deleted. Not disseminated.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:48 PM
link   
Publicity stunt distraction. Nothing more.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sostratus
Possible whistleblower coming forward;

www.freedomwatchusa.org...

47 hard drives and over 600 million pages of evidence.


This would make a good thread and keep the issues before the public. Definitely looks like a coverup to sweep it under the rug. The Swamp is quivering.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

No, that's not what it means. The OR in the definition makes it clear, just talking to any foreigner is enough. So if you talk to foreigners, you can be monitored.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Care to link?



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Krazysh0t

If they are using the true meaning of the term incidental collection then does that mean someone involved in terrorism was near Trumps team?

Could it be a protection detail logging things?

Good question. It certainly isn't good news for Trump (actually it's down right terrifying news for him), which makes it even MORE baffling that Trump supporters like the OP are trying to spin this like it is embarrassing for Obama.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:55 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

Give em the old razzle dazzle...🎶💋



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 03:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

No, any foreigner can be surveilled. Was talking to merkel bad news we all know she was surveilled by the obama admin?
edit on 22-3-2017 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
113
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join