It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The 8 min clip where the FBI lays out the PUBLIC evidence against Trump..

page: 4
10
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:39 AM
link   
a reply to: JinMI




So the dossier that describes all of the collusion is to be taken as the real deal now? I

As a whole? No.
Aspects of it, in light of what was discussed seem to be significant. That it is now known that there has been an active investigation of, not only Russian attempts to interfere with the election, but also an investigation of possible connections to members of the Trump campaign, would seem to indicate that the FBI has not discounted the dossier.




posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:39 AM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

It just appalls me that people actually think Trump would go that far. He wouldn't. The man loves American, still eats McDonald's and talks a lot of smack. Gotta love'em.

That is why "delusional" keeps getting tossed around.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:40 AM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

Ahh I believe you're right. Even better lol. Tanx.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: RrudGoud
a reply to: JoshuaCox

It's a Constitutional thing. Doesn't have anything to do with opinions.




Fair enough ..

That's why I said Ryan..because of the constitution.. lol..

I don't think you can give it to pence ONLY because of his own election being at the root of the scandal.
edit on 21-3-2017 by JoshuaCox because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Weren't all of Steele's sources "confidential?'



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: RrudGoud
a reply to: JoshuaCox

It's a Constitutional thing. Doesn't have anything to do with opinions.




Fair enough ..

That's why I said Ryan..because if the constitution.. lol..

I don't think you can give it to pence ONLY because of his on election being at the root of the scandal.
Calm down cow girl, your getting ahead of yourself and setting yourself up for failure.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: ColdWisdom

Ahh I believe you're right. Even better lol. Tanx.


Nope it was ties to Moscow oligarchs.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:44 AM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

I think the left's most recent attempt to conflate Manafort's Ukrainian ties to being a Russian agent involved demonizing the rebel group within the Ukraine as being a pro (Russian) separatist movement instead of a nationalist Ukrainian movement.

Smoke & mirrors, I know.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: Phage

Weren't all of Steele's sources "confidential?'







All the testables were verified and he is in great standing with both US and British intelligence.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

So the recent investigations that yielded nothing (so far) were instigated by this earlier dismissed dossier? That is my understanding on it.

More to the point of the thread, Schiffs statements are rehashing old news that has a conclusion thus far. Unless he has some inside info on whom retained the 19.5 percent brokerage, they've nothing to stand on.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:45 AM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

Yes.

What's your point? If investigation shows that aspects of the dossier are accurate what difference does that make?



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: ColdWisdom

Ahh I believe you're right. Even better lol. Tanx.


Nope it was ties to Moscow oligarchs.


Yep and Bannon played Trump for a sucker and set him up.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: The GUT

It just appalls me that people actually think Trump would go that far. He wouldn't. The man loves American, still eats McDonald's and talks a lot of smack. Gotta love'em.

That is why "delusional" keeps getting tossed around.



How does America lose in the proposed deal???

We don't care about Ukraine nor Russian sanctions..

Hypothetically it was win win for trump..

Trump wins and America doesn't lose..

Unless it gets found out and goes public..

I'm sure trump even thinks he would do a better job than hillary..

So from his POV.. he saves America from hillary in exchange for sanctions and Ukraine which VERY few Americans care about let alone would be willing to go to war over.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:48 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

What else happens? are you asking for a revote?

in "Theory" Trump and Pence won't get impeached, especially if Pence promises to fire the Cabinet and hire his own people



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:48 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Verified? source.

In good standing?

Your opinions don't count, evidence does.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust




That percentage will decline as more Trump economic policies take hold.

Because, why?
It doesn't matter what the president does? The only thing that matters is the economy?


Hey, it worked for Bill.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: ColdWisdom

Ahh I believe you're right. Even better lol. Tanx.


Nope it was ties to Moscow oligarchs.


Yep and Bannon played Trump for a sucker and set him up.



Y'all think trump is weak enough for his subordinates to assume they could make that call without his ok??

Doubtful..



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: The GUT

It just appalls me that people actually think Trump would go that far. He wouldn't. The man loves American, still eats McDonald's and talks a lot of smack. Gotta love'em.

That is why "delusional" keeps getting tossed around.



How does America lose in the proposed deal???

We don't care about Ukraine nor Russian sanctions..

Hypothetically it was win win for trump..

Trump wins and America doesn't lose..

Unless it gets found out and goes public..

I'm sure trump even thinks he would do a better job than hillary..

So from his POV.. he saves America from hillary in exchange for sanctions and Ukraine which VERY few Americans care about let alone would be willing to go to war over.


ummm, none of that. He had aspirations to become President and made his dream come true. Hillary was always corrupted.
He is saving Americans from its self serving politicians. The russian angle is deflection and fear mongering for an ignorant populace.

edit on 21-3-2017 by Arnie123 because: clean up



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Of course, it could happen, I am by no means a Trump apologist or supporter, I want it all abolished, I'm just saying in "theory" if an impeachment did happen



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Verified? source.

In good standing?

Your opinions don't count, evidence does.



Like plane trips by top aids to Moscow, top aids having releasing information only the Russians had, lying about secret meetings with Russia and Flynn getting caught in the payroll of a Russian puppet state in turkey??

You mean all of that easily verifiable evidence..

Oh and let's not forget trumps ONLY change to the GOP platform just days before the leaks started..
edit on 21-3-2017 by JoshuaCox because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join