It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Dealing with mistakes has long been a fact of life for journalists. The traditional course of action is to acknowledge the mistake, correct the mistake, apologize if necessary, and then move on. But in the era of any story less than 100% accurate being labeled “fake news” the temptation to quietly expunge the mistake from existence without any acknowledgement that the mistake was made is greater than ever. Only ABC News knows its motivation for attempting to disappear an embarrassing mistake it made in a story about a proposed wall at the U.S.-Mexican border. The original version, now deleted, included a tweet from a spoof Twitter handle the ABC apparently mistook as coming from President Trump.
After a reader posted a comment to the story about the error, ABC NEWS replaced it with this version; and deleted the comments from the reader pointing out the error.
originally posted by: SprocketUK
I do like the idea of rouge tweets though
originally posted by: SprocketUK
I do like the idea of rouge tweets though
originally posted by: introvert
I can understand.
When the tweet is reminiscent of something Trump would actually say, it can be confusing.
They should have fessed-up on their mistake, though.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
I can understand.
When the tweet is reminiscent of something Trump would actually say, it can be confusing.
They should have fessed-up on their mistake, though.
They didn't 'fess up'. They deleted a comment referencing their error after they replaced the article.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
I can understand.
When the tweet is reminiscent of something Trump would actually say, it can be confusing.
They should have fessed-up on their mistake, though.
They didn't 'fess up'. They deleted a comment referencing their error after they replaced the article.
No #. That's why I said they should have fessed-up.