It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump Redeemed - No Russia Collusion and 2 Warrants

page: 12
92
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 07:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Gothmog
I dont care who colluded with who. Hillary is not President
Russians , Assange , lets give someone the Congressional Medal of Honor. And many thanks for the assistance in preventing a further degradation of this country


We have a President on the verge of being impeached for treason. and you are giving it a
?

That is a liberal loon wet dream


If the Republicans want to retain control of Congress, where the real power is, they need to do something fast. The next election cycle has already begun. Sorry, that's how politics works in the real world.




posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 07:07 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Selling property to Russian oligarchs is not treason. It is not illegal to do business with Russians.



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 07:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: allsee4eye
a reply to: DJW001

Selling property to Russian oligarchs is not treason. It is not illegal to do business with Russians.


It is if the real estate transactions were a means to launder money for services rendered.



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 09:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: fleabit

Well the leaked Flynn documents must prove somebody else is listening.

And I don't think the questions directed at Comey were directed to the NSA Director.

They will deny everything that is classified.



Sorry.. it's just lame to assume he is innocent because you think it must be something SUPER secret. I guess anything to justify the non-deed for some folks. If Trump tweets it, it must be true? And if proof is not available, we'll just use the "must be classified" excuse as the last bastion of defense for Trump's comments. Heaven forbid he would have to admit he was wrong, and was just tweeting out in typical angsty Trump style once he was ticked off about something on social media.

Also - if Trump had you know.. actual proof, wouldn't he know the source? Wouldn't he have said it was something classified. instead of missing deadlines, and having to say things along the lines of "will find proof," as if he had nothing?



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 09:55 PM
link   
a reply to: fleabit

I think many Democrat politicians got used to the idea of "open" classified material.

That has changed.

Trump has already given the info to the Committees, but it is highly classified and will not be published willingly.



posted on Mar, 20 2017 @ 10:06 PM
link   
a reply to: elouina


"Late Friday night, I was aware of the DOJ turning in documents to the senate intelligence committee."

"Tonight I have even better news."

There's something weird about the way you act like you have this valuable *insider* info....or that's how you represent the content of your contributions sometimes.

This isn't the first time I've noticed it.

It seriously rubs me the wrong way.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: elouina

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: elouina

FRIDAY night! Why wasn't this headline news on Saturday? Because it's REAL news, of course. Star and Flag w/thanks!


Oh yeah I was privy to the documents being turned over minutes after. You see someone alerted me to the fact that Google Iceland is not censored like Google US. The Iceland constitution makes censorship illegal.

And so I experimented with a long search term and limiting results to those indexed in the last hour. Google US, 1 result. Google Iceland, 6 pages.

Folks not only have you been getting propaganda out of the wazoo, you are horribly censored. We all knew about Google, but it's worse than anyone could imagine.


Um wow!!!!????

Holy.....
That is thread worthy.
Make it and I'll flag it.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye


There's something weird about the way you act like you have this valuable *insider* info....or that's how you represent the content of your contributions sometimes.

This isn't the first time I've noticed it.

It seriously rubs me the wrong way.

Kind of delicate, eh? El brings a lot to the table here on these boards. You should take notes.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: allsee4eye
a reply to: DJW001

Selling property to Russian oligarchs is not treason. It is not illegal to do business with Russians.


It is if the real estate transactions were a means to launder money for services rendered.
Wasn't that in 2005?



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 12:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

We have a President on the verge of being impeached for treason. and you are giving it a
?

Overstated. Typical Woo. I think you are fantasy driven by some kind of PTSD over your loss.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 01:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

If the Republicans want to retain control of Congress, where the real power is, they need to do something fast. The next election cycle has already begun. Sorry, that's how politics works in the real world.


Noted.
So...sack the quarterback eh?

So pathetic.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 01:35 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Where does the buck stop?



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 01:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage


Where does the buck stop?


The Clinton Foundation. Reports show that their donations have dried up.




posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 01:39 AM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

Clinton is so 2016.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 01:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Phage is so 2008.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 01:41 AM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

Yeah, well.
I'm not the topic either. Right?

edit on 3/21/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 01:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burntheships

Where does the buck stop?


You know that answer.

If you are really afraid of the Russians as you say, and
Trump with them you would be looking for answers.

Yet you ignore The Clinton's collusion with Russia.

I'd be more direct, but its not really necessary.
Your disingenuous at best.

For now, you'll just have to cling to your blankie
and look away from the headlights.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 01:48 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

If you are really afraid of the Russians as you say, and
Trump with them you would be looking for answers.
I'm not particularly afraid of the Russians.



Yet you ignore The Clinton's collusion with Russia.
What have I ignored?



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 01:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burntheships

Where does the buck stop?


You know that answer.

If you are really afraid of the Russians as you say, and
Trump with them you would be looking for answers.

Yet you ignore The Clinton's collusion with Russia.

I'd be more direct, but its not really necessary.
Your disingenuous at best.

For now, you'll just have to cling to your blankie
and look away from the headlights.


Clinton isn't potus.



posted on Mar, 21 2017 @ 01:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: The GUT

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: allsee4eye
a reply to: DJW001

Selling property to Russian oligarchs is not treason. It is not illegal to do business with Russians.


It is if the real estate transactions were a means to launder money for services rendered.
Wasn't that in 2005?


We don't know. If only he would release his tax returns, I'm sure that would clear everything up....



new topics




 
92
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join