Can Anti-Trump So-Called Judges Stop ALL of His Major Projects?

a reply to: namelesss

Hang on a second, wasn't Fascism an extreme left political movement opposed to Communism from the 30's and 40's?

What does that have to do with Trump??

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: carewemust

The problem that the anti-American so-called President keeps running into seems to be that he and his staff love to hear themselves talk.

Trump calld it a Muslim ban from day one when he first announced that he wanted to put a ban on Muslims entering the country. It was a ban for all that time until Team Trump determined that they needed to stop calling it a ban. Then Giuliani goes on Fox News and says Trump tasked him with making the "Muslim ban' constitutional.

Telling the world that it's a Muslim ban that was dressed up in an attempt to make it legal wasn't a particularly clever move.

Now we've got Stephen Miller, once again on Fox News and this time, he's remarking about how the new ban is basically the old ban only further dressed up in an attempt to get around what had led to the restraining orders for the first ban.

Everyone knows exactly what is up here. This was always a Muslim ban. Now it's seems like maybe it's just about "winning" for the administration. How many days has it been since the purportedly 90-day travel ban supposed to go into place? Forty? How many months do you spend fighting for an emergency 90-day travel ban?

How the hell does that even make sense? Nearly half of the would be ban period has passed. Are they not "finding out what's going on" or whatever vague, stupid, nonsensical reason Trump cited for the ban in the first place?

BS.
You are cherry picking the narrative again, just like the ideologue judge.
Long before Trump was elected the narrative around the ban had changed.

As for 'how many days" since the travel ban was originally put in place, you have failed to think a little more deeply.
The countries that Trump is trying to force to cooperate, to improve their information sharing about people trying to enter the US, have zero incentive to do so when rogue judges show them the Executive branch can be overruled. They have no incentive at all to listen any of Trumps demands.

Trump is right that the US looks weak because of these rogue judges.
This ruling by the Hawaiian judge opens up all sorts of problems, just like the OP points out. There is already a report that HIAS intend to use this ruling to force Trump to increase the number of refugees from 50,000 to 1000,000, not just stop the ban.

The plaintiffs’ request for 100,000 refugees each year was made by lawyers for the International Refugee Assistance Protect, HIAS Inc., a so-called “VOLAG” which is paid by federal agencies to import refugees, and by members of the Middle East Studies Association.

“Judge Chuang’s ruling … leaves the door open for further discussion of our challenges to the refugee ban, an opening we intend to pursue,” said a March 15 statement from HIAS. “So stay tuned for more news as our lawsuit continues.” HIAS received at least $19.5 million in government grants in 2014, according to its federal 990 form.

What you have is a judge acting like a supreme ruler, something you have accused Trump of, ironically - and now seem all for it.

a reply to: carewemust

Yea! Screw checks and balances now that your guy is in power! Let him do whatever he wants!

Judicial activism sucks, yea. But it sucks whichever side of the aisle it's on, it doesn't just suck because now it's happening to Trump.

Your level of dogmatic subservience to all things Trump is legitimately hair-raising and I hope you, and the other mental midgets that share your ideology, remain a small and angry minority. Just when I thought you were done, you go and do something else that draws yet another parallel to the rise of the nazis way back when.

The EU is manipulating and controlling US judges in attempts to scuttle projects like the DAPL and Keystone-XL pipelines. Brussels is directly involved in fomenting the protests at these sites.

originally posted by: SBMcG

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: carewemust
March 13, 2017

With Federal Judges across the nation making up FAKE/WEAK reasons for defying President Trump's temporary travel bans, what else have WE THE PEOPLE given them to power to do?

Can an anti-American judge also suddenly stop Trump Wall from starting? Or halt it, during the process of being built, citing "Most Mexicans are Catholics" and labeling the wall a Catholic discrimination tool?

How about if the 300mph High-Speed Train crosses Indian Land? Forget the fact that Indians would financially benefit. A mentally unbalanced, lone-wolf anti-Trump Judge, could rule the rail line project as discriminatory to Indians, because they have spirit elders hovering in the vicinity.

Have we given Federal Judges so much power that they can literally do whatever they want? If so...how can we legally reduce their authority???

-CareWeMust

You equate a liberal court with being anti-American. More people voted against Trump than for him. So, that other percentage that supports a centrist SC...are they anti-American, too?

Absolutely meaningless.

If the Constitution required the president be elected by popular vote the campaigns would be run accordingly and Bill Clinton's unaccomplished, inept, corrupt, drunk of a wife would have lost even worse than she did.

People would also vote accordingly. In many states people don't vote because they know that vote won't count because of the Electoral System. If every vote counted, you would see a massive power-shift to the right in this country. Leftists -- "liberals", are only 25% of the electorate.

In 2016, when you factor out California, Trump won the popular vote by 1.3 million. Think about that...

So if you ignore a bunch of votes for people other than Trump, then Trump wins?

Boy, why didn't Trump's team think of that? "Hey guys, if you ignore all those votes for other people, then I totally got more votes than anybody else did."

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: carewemust

Yea! Screw checks and balances now that your guy is in power! Let him do whatever he wants!

Judicial activism sucks, yea. But it sucks whichever side of the aisle it's on, it doesn't just suck because now it's happening to Trump.

...and it is there for a reason. Your Founding Fathers realised that 'party like it's 1776' would be limiting over the long term - and they were betting on the long term.

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: carewemust

Judicial activism sucks, yea. But it sucks whichever side of the aisle it's on, it doesn't just suck because now it's happening to Trump.

.

President Donald J. Trump raised American's awareness of these "Judicial activists". I had heard that phrase before, but didn't know what it meant until the judges started demonstrating its meaning, by overturning legal travel restrictions.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: carewemust

How do we dial back their authority? Is a Constitutional Amendment needed? I bet we'd get at least 10 million signatures on a petition.

I would argue impeachment, but then again, I do not know enough about to offer an adequete solution.

If they start abusing their authority too much, I'm sure our President will "Tweet" to followers what we need to do. He's not shy..and CRAVES action. (Like many of us!)

originally posted by: Shamrock6

originally posted by: SBMcG

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: carewemust
March 13, 2017

With Federal Judges across the nation making up FAKE/WEAK reasons for defying President Trump's temporary travel bans, what else have WE THE PEOPLE given them to power to do?

Can an anti-American judge also suddenly stop Trump Wall from starting? Or halt it, during the process of being built, citing "Most Mexicans are Catholics" and labeling the wall a Catholic discrimination tool?

How about if the 300mph High-Speed Train crosses Indian Land? Forget the fact that Indians would financially benefit. A mentally unbalanced, lone-wolf anti-Trump Judge, could rule the rail line project as discriminatory to Indians, because they have spirit elders hovering in the vicinity.

Have we given Federal Judges so much power that they can literally do whatever they want? If so...how can we legally reduce their authority???

-CareWeMust

You equate a liberal court with being anti-American. More people voted against Trump than for him. So, that other percentage that supports a centrist SC...are they anti-American, too?

Absolutely meaningless.

If the Constitution required the president be elected by popular vote the campaigns would be run accordingly and Bill Clinton's unaccomplished, inept, corrupt, drunk of a wife would have lost even worse than she did.

People would also vote accordingly. In many states people don't vote because they know that vote won't count because of the Electoral System. If every vote counted, you would see a massive power-shift to the right in this country. Leftists -- "liberals", are only 25% of the electorate.

In 2016, when you factor out California, Trump won the popular vote by 1.3 million. Think about that...

So if you ignore a bunch of votes for people other than Trump, then Trump wins?

Boy, why didn't Trump's team think of that? "Hey guys, if you ignore all those votes for other people, then I totally got more votes than anybody else did."

Newsflash.
Trump won the election.
Trump won 30 out of 50 states, and 2,623 counties, to Clinton’s 20 states or 489 counties.
Clinton won California by 4.2 million votes and New York by 1.6 million, meaning that across 48 of the 50 states, Trump was the victor by about 3 million votes in the popular vote. Including New York, he was the popular vote winner by more than a million votes.

a reply to: Shamrock6

What the hell are you talking about he DID ignore it and won easily.

originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
a reply to: namelesss

Hang on a second, wasn't Fascism an extreme left political movement opposed to Communism from the 30's and 40's?

What does that have to do with Trump??

fas·cism
ˈfaSHˌizəm/Submit
noun
an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
synonyms: authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy; More
(in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.