It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BeneGesseritWitch
But only because it would take you like 100 years to get up to light speed;
Fun fact; at an acceleration of 1g it would take pretty darned close to 1 year to reach lightspeed.
Of course, that assumes that you could maintain that rate of acceleration. That's problematic. The faster you go, the more problematic.
originally posted by: carewemust
I saw a movie 3 years ago where 4 members of a 5 person crew left orbit, went down to a planet for a few hours, and returned to the orbiting mothership.
The poor bastard who stayed on the ship waiting for the crew to come back, waited 40 YEARS! I had to sit there in the theatre for awhile after to movie had ended, trying to figure out what all I had just seen, LOL.
I really need to watch that movie again...and maybe a 3rd time.
originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: carewemust
Moving at most 99% of light would use an infinite amount of energy
Moving at near light speed would mean any object would have infinite mass. And would be stretched to an infinite length (i.e. spaghettified )
So , potential answer to your question : Never (unless the Great Einstein was wrong completely )
originally posted by: projectvxn
There will come a time when we are able to generate enough energy to warp space. Traveling at light speed or close to it would be insanely inefficient.
originally posted by: projectvxn
There will come a time when we are able to generate enough energy to warp space. Traveling at light speed or close to it would be insanely inefficient.
originally posted by: Plotus
Not exactly sure about when, but how....... ?
www.oreillyauto.com...
'search' .... 121 G you may find this unit helpful. It appears to be a backordered item..