|
reply posted on 12-2-2005 @ 10:20 AM by duff beer dragon
|
Maybe ask truckers that drive diesel trucks in cold areas on a regular basis? You know, those other guys with rigs that you'd see sitting in the
truck stops, having coffee or something to eat............
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-2-2005 @ 07:08 AM by launchpad
|
any one see anything about the Volkswagon Lupo (SP)? As far as i know it has not been released in the US but when i was in Greenland the Danish ravied
about it.
Supposedly the thing gets around 95 mpg (reports vary) on diesel and is way cheaper than a hybrid car and has much longer range too. i guess the
drawback is it is about the size of a Cooper Mini.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-2-2005 @ 12:00 AM by cybertroy
|
95 miles per gallon. Sweet.
Troy
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-2-2005 @ 02:51 PM by launchpad
|
plans, plans, plans anyone have plans? not just the "i did it web sites" but real step by step plans?
really interested in the bio diesel, wind farm, and grey water recycling i figure before i go off and re invent the wheel i would ask the worlds
largest forum.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 22-2-2005 @ 10:15 PM by AlabamaCajun
|
Hydro Power posted sometime back, thats good to hear that we have projects underway and in somecases without flooding large areas (bonus).
1992 Mercury 30 to 35 mpg, Town Car 27 using computers!
1960's 50 mpg carb, Snopes ate this one for breakfast, the stories have been around for a lot longer. It's possible that around the 50s or 60s that
someone got a carb to do high mpg, but they probably burned up the valves and gave up. Then 2 guys showed up, tinkered under the hood and the carb
has never been seen again.
Why is it that a 3700 lb towncar with all the bling and 8 cyls can get 27mpg and a ranger that weighs a lot less with no bling and a 4 popper only get
25mpg?
Try asking a hybrid dealer for a solar panel option!   
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-2-2005 @ 10:34 PM by AlabamaCajun
|
Originally posted by sardion2000
What about Aqua Fuel
Here is a link with instructions on how to build a proof of concept model.
members.fortunecity.com...
And here is another link talking more about how it works...
www.blazelabs.com...
by sardion2000]
Now if they can reduce the Wattage needed to build the plasma, this would become a super efficent source. Introducing a catalyst into the arc may also
reduce power input requirements or increase COH2 production. Also consider, are the carbon rods costly to produce and environmentally safty in mind. I
think the gas generator itself is generally eco-safe.
Interesting process.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-2-2005 @ 08:38 PM by launchpad
|
the hydro generator is cool but it takes WAY more energy to produce the gas it runs on. not practical at all.
any one got real plans for the bio fuel generators?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-2-2005 @ 10:06 PM by launchpad
|
carbon rods are expendable -- correct? that makes them part of the fuel source and their calculations are ficticious then. i've been playing with the
H2O seperations since the 6th grade- way, way back. fun, facinating, but still not ready for putting into use.
Else i'll have a lawnmower running on water next week and my cars just a little further down the road.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-2-2005 @ 10:57 PM by AlabamaCajun
|
Originally posted by sardion2000
Of course this does not take into account the amount of energy it takes to manufacture Carbon Rods to make this whole thing work, but that is where I
see Carbon Nanotechnology coming into play. I will elaborate more if anyone wishes, but will leave it at that for now.
Now this is an Idea. If you use N-Tech to make rods that produce a stable plasma at the micro level, you can overcome the need for high energy input.
The problem to overcome is that the Carbon is a consumable and the process will be short lived until a feeder method could be developed. Before you
think I've flipped a neuron here, think about this. Photosynthesis in a leaf breaks corbon from a CO2 cule and releases the O2 just by the catalyst
chlorophyll in the presence of water and sunlight. The sugar is converted to wood or more leaves via nitrates and minerals in the water.
I think that we are close to getting a fuel source that will change the planet. Take this tech out to an oil spill run the water through a converter
and produce 100's or cubic feet of this eco-fuel. Other uses, speedup biogas from human and livestock waste and avoid the greehouse gases released
from all these farms.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 24-2-2005 @ 03:45 AM by launchpad
|
nanos? are you guys serious? NANOS? AS in NANO_BOTS?
are we living in the SAME world? or are we talking about a sci-fi novel? is it so late at night i feel asleep and woke up in THE rabbit hole?
boy, you guys are overly optimistic to expect to see nano bots assembing carbon rods for this device. We are about as close to working nano bots as
Galilao was to catching a ride on one of the Apollo missions.
the self healing armour thread pretty much covered where we stand on nano bots at this time. they might make for an interesting thread of their own
since they seem to keep coming up.
anyone got anything on the CURRENT tech- concerning bio fuel and possibly wind power? how about plans? looking for plans so i don't have to reinvent
the wheel.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-2-2005 @ 11:25 PM by AlabamaCajun
|
Thank Sardion2000, That reference was to Nanotech as in carbon nano-tubes or possibly buckey balls. In some sort of feeder to keep a fresh supply of
carbon at the plasma. How carbon nanotubes are special rods would come into place is a matter of physics, getting the most work out of the least
amount of energy. But if while some of us are sleeping and we can come up with a nonobot that can bang carbon and hydrogen atoms together to produce
this gas then I up for that tech also.
All intentions or serious here, just passing around ideas and who knows someone perusing this board reads this and gets an idea, maybe different, but
it sparks a new process and tomorrow we start seeing this stuff hit the market.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-2-2005 @ 01:14 AM by launchpad
|
WHEEW! (wipes forehead), i was afraid i was going to be shuffeled!
nano tubes i am quite familiar with and if could be produced cheaply be a possibility someday- buckballs however would be difficult to employ.
i stand by my earlier statement that the statements to efficiency are greatly inflated probably as much as 1000% or even more.
still looking for some plans! com'mon folks we got a lot of people here- no windmill plans? no links?
no bio fuel plans? no links? i was sure you conspiracy folks would be the first to try and "get off the grid"- so where are all the folks with the
plans???
i throw down the gauntlent!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-3-2005 @ 08:42 AM by launchpad
|
biting the bullet and starting work on my own Bio-diesel plant;
i have a bit of property to hide it on since i have 2.5 acres- in colorado and diesel prices are going nuts.
it looks like none of you guys have any plans that you are willing to share so i will be re-inventing the wheel to get this done up. It maybe a while
until it is operational since i plan to use quality construction and fully automated short of raw material injection and have it transportable via
trailer or my f-350.
right now i have started gathering hot water heater tanks- for the various processing stages
i guess i'll keep you all posted on how things turn out.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 9-3-2005 @ 03:55 PM by launchpad
|
sweet! Thanks Sardon!
All other offerings, tid bits and 'what not' will be accepted!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-3-2005 @ 05:19 PM by accountability
|
Originally posted by launchpad
sweet! Thanks Sardon!
All other offerings, tid bits and 'what not' will be accepted!
www.realgoods.com...
I get these advertisement catalogues in the mail all the time-
I am interested in seeing how well my 'play' solar set-up works with my new 6 watt light bulb
I also take my diet drink steel cans and flatten them for the metal- (future roofing material maybe for my chicken coop) rainwater goes to the garden-
wastewater from the kitchen goes to the landscaping- worm farm gets half the food waste- compost bin gets the other half- save seeds from the
'wild' city- cuttings from the wild 'city' trees- and my dogs are the best vacuum cleaners in town
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-3-2005 @ 06:34 PM by Ambient Sound
|
As in most things, it's not so much a question of technology at this point as of mindset. We are conditioned to use a certain amount of energy and we
are conditioned not to think about where it comes from. Part of meeting our energy needs is changing what those needs are (ie: using less).
98% of American households could not survive if they had to be responsible for their own energy generation or waste disposal. Our building codes and
zoning regulations raise functional barriers as well.
A man from New Mexico named Michael Reynolds pioneered the "Earthship", a housing system made of automobile tires (a resource that we have in
abundance). I've done a good bit of research on it and the associated technologies. The structure is a far superior way to build a dwelling, (heats
and cools itself, tornado proof,) but try to get one approved by your local building inspector. Try to get a building permit to build a dwelling with
grey water recycling, solar toilet, and rainwater collection. Oh it can be done, but the hoops to jump through are many and often on fire.
If you ask me, every fast flowing river in the US should have 1000s of little microhydro generators next to it. Every roof in the nation should be
covered with photovoltaics and solar water heating systems. Windmills should be everywhere. Energy generation should move away from the large scale
long distance transmission model for areas where it can, like private residences. I have to say I am delighted when I see road signs powered by solar
instead of sucking from the grid.
No. Wind, Solar, and Hydro are not enough by themselves at their current technology levels but I still believe we should be using them where we can.
Wind, Sunlight, and Gravity are all free, very clean, and never run out.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |