Judge Napolitano: Obama used British spies for Trump wiretap caper

originally posted by: Sillyolme
The same judge who's " inside sources" told him that they had the goods on Hillary and they were going to indict her any minute now? That judge Napolitano?
FOX news resident uninformed judiciary representative.

EXACTLY!!!

Not only that, aren't these the same people who unconditionally dismiss any accusations made by un-named sources? Did Napolitano give us the names of his sources?

And.....how come every time I click on the FNC link provided in the OP, I'm taken directly to Breitbart?

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and call judge Napolitano and his story total B.S..

a reply to: kurthall

Your post is comedy and I love it, you give bill burr a run for his money and thats, "MY COMEDIAN!"

Of course, you're so above the masses that only you have the correct and valid view on how we should conduct and support our President. You supported EIGHT years of crap. Dwindling middle class, several budget cuts to our military and PC king.

We point the fingers at liberals when violent riots break out, argue from your ass with no real validity or substance and try to let the worlds terrorist in.

The election was last year kurt, the meltdown can stop.

Every thread no matter the subject is turned into a spat between right and left. (Yes, I do my part.)

One has to ask after a while though ... why is that?

a reply to: SBMcG


what about all the Russian spies who DIED shortly after the British dossier came out?

a reply to: talisman
You cant ask for evidence from most trump supporters, or trump and his staff for that matter. No matter what if you do not support trump you are wrong here. Trump made his statements about Obama, and somehow with no proof, every trump supporter here just believes him, with absolutely proof needed. Even when the accusation has to do with our ex President breaking the law...... that is the way it is here, and it is a crock!!! Ask for proof, DEMAND IT!! Do not believe everything you read from anyone on here, without looking into it yourself on the side!!!!

a reply to: Gryphon66

You already know the answer to that question.

It becomes a case of, "I'm right, You're wrong" and then maintain a solid grasp on those positions.

The goal was to reach a "middle ground" but do to bias, that won't even be the case because you know, the whole "NOT MY PRESIDENT" deal.

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: SBMcG


what about all the Russian spies who DIED shortly after the British dossier came out?

Name one.

Link?

Are you accusing Trump of having something to do with that?

originally posted by: SBMcG

originally posted by: Grimpachi
This thread seems to be one of those where the OP presents something that could have happened and tries to convince others it did happen.

No evidence just gut feelings.

Wrong. I posted a news report.

Have anything else...?

So, now "Fox & Friends" is a news source?

Shirley, you jest?

Who else thinks this is a distraction from this?

www.infowars.com...

New Report: FBI wiretapped Trump server, found nothing...

Let's see... Who was the president when this spying on Trump occurred? Was it mmm mmm mmm, Barack Hussein Obama, mmm mmm mmm?

Sara Carter: There was a traditional FBI investigation into the server that was connected to Trump Tower. It was registered to Trump Tower. That investigation was to look into the server and to see if there were pings between the Trump Tower and a bank. And the FBI found absolutely nothing nefarious or criminal within that investigation.

Sean Hannity: So there was some surveillance at some point of the server for Trump Tower which was off site not exactly at the Tower.

Sara Carter: That’s absolutely correct. There was surveillance of the server that was registered to Trump Tower, Trump Tower businesses, and at that point they went in for less than two weeks… They went in and found no evidence within that server to date of collusion between Trump and Russians whatsoever.

Source: Gateway Pundit

The evidence is overwhelming that the Obama Regime wiretapped and spied on the Trump Organization and Campaign at Trump Tower.

The FISA requests (and warrant), the wiretapped call by Flynn at Trump Tower, the FBI wiretap of the Trump server, the use of a foreign intelligence agency (British GCHQ) to spy on American citizen Trump -- and this is only what we know about!

Obama and his Regime already had an established history of spying on American citizens going back to his Senate race in 2004.

Meanwhile, Obama has denied EVERY SINGLE FOIA REQUEST to unseal his own personal documents, and in 2016 alone, spent $36 million in taxpayer funds to block a multitude of other FOIA inquiries.

Add into that mix the nonstop history of unabashed lying to the American people, from the Obamacare like/keep lies, to Benghazi being caused by a video, Fast and Furious, the IRS spying scandal, and on and on and on.

Meanwhile, can you give me an example of even ONE lie Trump has told?

As far as I'm concerned, I think this revelation about the FBI spying on Trump's server is the final nail for any defense of Obama in this.

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: SBMcG

originally posted by: Grimpachi
This thread seems to be one of those where the OP presents something that could have happened and tries to convince others it did happen.

No evidence just gut feelings.

Wrong. I posted a news report.

Have anything else...?

So, now "Fox & Friends" is a news source?

Shirley, you jest?

ummm, who cares? A source was posted. Click it and provide a rebuttal, not that "pist" your just posted.

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: SBMcG

originally posted by: Grimpachi
This thread seems to be one of those where the OP presents something that could have happened and tries to convince others it did happen.

No evidence just gut feelings.

Wrong. I posted a news report.

Have anything else...?

So, now "Fox & Friends" is a news source?

Shirley, you jest?

I think it's as good as any. It's Fox, not some propaganda arm of the DNC like CNN or MSNBC where lying is considered justified in defense of the failed socialist ideology they espouse.

You're welcome to provide contradictory evidence to refute the reporting of Judge Napolitano.

originally posted by: PlasticWizard
Who else thinks this is a distraction from this?

www.infowars.com...

Wow! Holy Christ! If this is even remotely accurate a lot of people are going to jail including Obama!

Actually, at this point, I think there's zero chance Obama doesn't go to prison.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Yes at this point what we're seeing is just them tossing out a variety of non conclusive guesses and seeing which one people will accept and then they'll say, "Yep, there ya go. That's what happened all along then."

That however isn't a fact just an agreed upon belief.

a reply to: PlasticWizard

Nice catch! A two way street, I've got to remember to look both ways whenever a big article pops up.

originally posted by: CubbieFan

If it was true ( Which it is not) Obama was doing it to protect the American people from an obviously mentally ill, corrupt, sycophantic dictator. But its not true cause as always trump has not one piece of evidence.

Every word that comes out of trumps mouth is a lie and not even a good one. He just knows his followers will believe whatever he said blindly. Its truly scary.

If it was true ( Which it is not) Trump was doing it to protect the American people from an obviously mentally ill, corrupt, sycophantic dictator. But its not true cause as always Obama has not one piece of evidence.

Every word that comes out of Obama's mouth is a lie and not even a good one. He just knows his followers will believe whatever he said blindly. Its truly scary.

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Gryphon66

Yes at this point what we're seeing is just them tossing out a variety of non conclusive guesses and seeing which one people will accept and then they'll say, "Yep, there ya go. That's what happened all along then."

That however isn't a fact just an agreed upon belief.

So in other words, what you're doing, got it.

a reply to: PlasticWizard

Well, I certainly say that the info provided in that link is a distraction from what this thread is about.

Why is it nobody wants to stay focused on solving the information in the thread???

That link would be it's own topic all together and doesn't effect the outcome of this thread in any way.

a reply to: Arnie123

Ummm...No, not even close.

I'm not giving a whole bunch of possible theories to anything.

I'm waiting for the proof that is supposed to already exist and be provided by Trump.

That is the exact opposite actually.

a reply to: SBMcG

Obama has always thought he was smarter than anyone else. He spent years putting his personal safety net in place and infiltrating our government with his players. Yes....I said infiltrated (as in Trojan horse.)

The Dems have always thought their causes were more righteous than anybody else's and that the ends justify the means. They are so arrogant that they would damn the Constitution and the rule of law to accomplish the goals of their ideology.

Obama screwed up. He has met his match and then some. He never expected anybody other than Hillary to win. They sabotaged Bernie Sanders (or paid him off) and until the summer of 2016 discounted Donald Trump.

Obama is toast. You screw The American People and they find out about it, you are in serious trouble. I have said it before and I will say it again, "Obama is the worst thing Americans ever did to themselves".