It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Judge Napolitano: Obama used British spies for Trump wiretap caper

page: 10
69
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 07:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: SBMcG

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: SBMcG

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: SBMcG

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: SBMcG

originally posted by: Grimpachi
This thread seems to be one of those where the OP presents something that could have happened and tries to convince others it did happen.

No evidence just gut feelings.


Wrong. I posted a news report.

Have anything else...?


So, now "Fox & Friends" is a news source?

Shirley, you jest?


I think it's as good as any. It's Fox, not some propaganda arm of the DNC like CNN or MSNBC where lying is considered justified in defense of the failed socialist ideology they espouse.

You're welcome to provide contradictory evidence to refute the reporting of Judge Napolitano.


You do realize that for starters, the Fox network as well as "Fox & Friends" don't even identify their show as a news source.

And secondly, Fox News in the only news network that actually took it to court, fought for and won, the right to lie to their viewers.

So far as I can tell, every so-called news source listed in the thread propagates "fake news" and y'all just eat it up.



You're entitled to your opinion, I strongly disagree. Fox & Friends is a news and commentary show on a cable news channel. Napolitano was making a news report on that show based upon reporting presumably he had done. maybe others (producers, reporters) were involved as well.

Just because you don't like the reporting doesn't mean it's not true.

Obama is a well-established liar with a long history of spying.

This news about Trump shouldn't shock anyone.


Really??? That's the best you got???

Fox News went to court and fought for the right to lie to their viewers and to fire any of their reporters who refused to do so on the air in a Florida court and won!!!!!

Who does that??? I'll tell you who, someone who plans on lying a lot, that's who.

Fox News recognized early on that there was a very gullible, willfully ignorant demographic out there who were seeking a "news source" who wouldn't let lying stand in the way of pandering to their pre-determined bias and you be them.


Those are the same laughably-desperate leftist talking points in your previous point without any source to back up the loony claims.

Name ONE news story Fox intentionally lied about or we're done here.



It was a story regarding growth hormones in milk back in 1997, I think.

It was over two reporters who refused to lie on air regarding a story they had put together that documented the fact that these growth hormones were in milk being sold to all of us.

Their story was edited by the network to remove references to the growth hormones in order to protect a sponsor or VIP and the reporters bucked and threatened to call the FCC.

I think it was 2003 or 2004 when the courts ruled that Fox News could indeed lie to it's viewers if it wanted to, but they also awarded the reporters somewhere in the neighborhood of $400,000 for being threatened by the network for whistleblowing.

I'm sure you can still find it on google.

Like Donald Trump, I wouldn't lie to you. Believe me.




posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 07:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Byrd

There's no proof anywhere about Comey saying anything to anybody.

"Fact" juggling is a problem.



This is a significant fact that needs to be restated: Comey has never confirmed the statement attributed to him by the NY Times quoting a "senior American official".



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 07:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Flatfish

You have zero credibility at this point.

We're done.



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 07:16 PM
link   

FACT CHECK: Yes, Obama Could Have Used British To Wiretap Trump


The Resurgent



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 07:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: SBMcG

I'm just saying. He said that over and over again all last spring. His FBI Bffs told him so.
His sources are his own opinions and nothing more. Obviously that or his sources are just plain wrong.
One or the other.
So this source is questionable. Until something backs it up. Sorry. It's not like he's not obviously biased against Obama.


The only problem with that though, is that everyone already knows that no bias is necessary for Obama to do all kinds of dirty deeds.



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 07:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: missed_gear
a reply to: Flatfish

Show them or not Marti Gras...

Nice fade and switch.

No, you prove first. You made it a point. You deny ignorance.

Yes?

Mg


What is it you want me to prove?

I don't know how to link source articles with my phone, but I'm sure you can google it and it will come up.

There was an investigative story that exposed growth hormones in milk put together by two Florida Fox News reporters in the late 1990s and the network edited out all references to growth hormones in order to protect a sponsor and when the reporters refused to read the edited version on air they were fired.

They sued for being unjustly fired but the Fox News affiliate won the case contending that it was their right to dictate the story, false or not.

It is what it is whether you believe it or not.



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 07:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: SBMcG
a reply to: Flatfish

You have zero credibility at this point.

We're done.


Damn! Now what will I do? My life is ruined.



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 07:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Flatfish

originally posted by: SBMcG
a reply to: Flatfish

You have zero credibility at this point.

We're done.


Damn! Now what will I do? My life is ruined.



What do you expect? You made a series of laughably-outlandish claims and then got angry when you couldn't provide proof to back them up.

When the dust settled you gave some nebulous example of a local Fox affiliate (I assume) and a bunch of nonsense about bovine hormones.

You, madame or sir, have zero credibility with me as a result.

I stipulate in advance that means nothing to you.

Have a nice evening.



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 07:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: SBMcG

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
Obama was their dancing cabin boy and now that he has outlived his usefulness to them by causing race talk and racial division to be a bigger talking point and problem than we ever had between 60 and 1990 now hes getting mowed.

a reply to: SBMcG



I am a constitutional conservative so I don't spend a lot of time studying the lesser leftists out there. I had never even heard of Obama until 2006 or so.

In 2008, when the GOP nominated sure-loser "Songbird" McCain to run against Obama all I thought was -- I hope these leftists vetted this nobody from nowhere because he's going to win.

I warned everyone I knew -- be careful of this guy Obama. He's never done anything, he's got a VERY sketchy back-story, and something doesn't smell right.
But he was a novelty candidate and McCain was the worst candidate in GOP history, so Obama was going to win no matter what. But as the months passed, I knew something was truly wrong with this dookie. He has an almost preternatural ability to believe his own lies. It was clear to me he didn't care for white males and even clearer to me that his freakishly-large and masculine "wife" truly hated whites in general. His hatred of the military was obvious. They knew it too and booed him on several occasions. Then Trump entered the picture and started asking about Obama's origins. That resonated with me and from that point forward I became an amateur Obama origins researcher. By the close of business on 27 April 2011 I was 100% certain that all my digging and subsequent suspicions were correct -- "Obama" was using a forged birth certificate. We know what's gone on since then of course. More lying, more spying. Thankfully, American voters kept his wings clipped for the last 6 years of his presidency. In 2012 the GOP self-destructed again by nominating a Mormon. Millions of Evangelicals refused to vote GOP that year. Obama barely won that election anyway. Obama has spent his entire life scamming and grifting. Community Organizer...? Give me a break... That was a phony position created for him so his Chicago handlers had time to mold his political persona. Obama is a fabrication, an empty vessel, and a wholly-corrupt operator. So here we are. As Obama's final act of contempt for the country I truly believe he hates, he attempts to subvert the electoral process: but there is a universal constant throughout Obama's life. He fails. Everything he's ever touched in politics has ended up a great big Nothing Burger. He got elected to two terms as president, but what's he got for his library -- Obamacare, a law that won't exist by the time the paint is dry? I have no doubt Obama did what Trump has accused him of. How, when, where, the lesser details -- we might never know.


Very well said, and also very accurate. Obama's own past 8 years and prior behavior including using Tony Rezko Chicago mafia man to help him win his senate seat are the most damning indictments against him, using just his own proven behavior and lies, he convicts himself for any honest person to plainly see.



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 08:08 PM
link   
a reply to: SBMcG

wasn't pm of japan just here?



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 08:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Oh great idea. Now North Korea is there too.

So let's just see if I get what you're saying. Basically the British are now the ones who are illegally tapping Trump for Obama now.

Why not just come right out and say what you're really trying to say. Which is it's everyone but Russia who's up to something. Regardless of how stupid that may sound that's what you want people to actually believe.

So dumb.


Funny...guess who just hit main story on Fox...North Korea...

North Korea



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 08:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: SBMcG

Oh right ok.

So now it's another government working for Obama that 's doing it. Right.....

But what about those microwaves and TV's???

Plus I thought Spicer already said the problem was people taking him literally???

Looks like all we really have here is excuses after excuses. Sure stinks like a cover up to me.

Why not just throw in the mix that it was aliens or maybe the mandella effect while your at it??? Perhaps time travelers???

Such BS.


I say we bring the Russians back into it with no evidence as before. That or let the left start blaming North Korea...they are surely missing all the attention they got prior to Russian hacking...



Wow...almost on queue the North Koreans come back to life...

Link



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 08:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: proteus33
a reply to: SBMcG

wasn't pm of japan just here?


Shinzo Abe, yes.

Why? Has he been spying on Trump too?



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 08:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Of course it did.



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 08:42 PM
link   
a reply to: SBMcG

I never got angry because I never felt the need to prove what I know to be true and I quit trying to prove anything to Trump supporters once I found out that one out of three of them is just as stupid as the other two.

The story is true and quite verifiable to anyone who is interested.

Could care less about your assessment of me because it was never my goal to impress you to begin with.

The good thing about the truth is that it doesn't matter whether you believe it or not. It still is what it is, the truth.

Truth is, Fox News depends on lies for it's very existence.

Same as Breitbart, InfoWars, WorldNetDaily and all those other fake news sources that you Trump supporters so love.



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 09:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Flatfish
a reply to: SBMcG

I never got angry because I never felt the need to prove what I know to be true and I quit trying to prove anything to Trump supporters once I found out that one out of three of them is just as stupid as the other two.

The story is true and quite verifiable to anyone who is interested.

Could care less about your assessment of me because it was never my goal to impress you to begin with.

The good thing about the truth is that it doesn't matter whether you believe it or not. It still is what it is, the truth.

Truth is, Fox News depends on lies for it's very existence.

Same as Breitbart, InfoWars, WorldNetDaily and all those other fake news sources that you Trump supporters so love.


Wow....you should send your findings to the Intelligence Committee ASAP! I am sure they will be useful on the 20th.

Crazy that nobody has been able to come up with undeniable verifiable proof of the allegations...except you.



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 09:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Flatfish
a reply to: SBMcG

I never got angry because I never felt the need to prove what I know to be true and I quit trying to prove anything to Trump supporters once I found out that one out of three of them is just as stupid as the other two.

The story is true and quite verifiable to anyone who is interested.

Could care less about your assessment of me because it was never my goal to impress you to begin with.

The good thing about the truth is that it doesn't matter whether you believe it or not. It still is what it is, the truth.

Truth is, Fox News depends on lies for it's very existence.

Same as Breitbart, InfoWars, WorldNetDaily and all those other fake news sources that you Trump supporters so love.


Are you calling me "stupid"?

I'm definitely an enthusiastic Trump supporter, and using your math, 100% of Trump supporters are "stupid".

Am I "stupid" or am I exempt from that equation?



posted on Mar, 14 2017 @ 09:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Just to be clear, it was never Flatfish's goal to impress us to begin with, LMMFLWAO!




posted on Mar, 15 2017 @ 12:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Thanks for the meaningless rhetoric! Actually, no, having allies doesn't mean we grant them unlimited access to the findings of an entire agency. Secondly, it doesn't mean a sitting president can solicit them in order to influence an election. I mean, why not open a formal investigation domestically?



posted on Mar, 15 2017 @ 02:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
The same judge who's " inside sources" told him that they had the goods on Hillary and they were going to indict her any minute now? That judge Napolitano?
FOX news resident uninformed judiciary representative.


Yup. If this story was from the other side everyone would be saying 'proof or it's fake news'

So I'm calling fake news. More speculation. That's it.




top topics



 
69
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join