It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Bill would let employers penalize workers who say no to genetic testing
Employers could impose hefty penalties on employees who decline to participate in genetic testing as part of workplace wellness programs if a bill approved by a House committee becomes law.
Employers, in general, don't have that power under existing federal laws that protect genetic privacy and nondiscrimination. But a bill passed last week by a House committee would allow employers to get around that if the information is collected as part of workplace wellness programs.
...The latest legislation, though, would allow employers to impose penalties of up to 30% of the total cost of the employee's health insurance on those who choose to keep such information private.
"It's a terrible Hobson's choice between affordable health insurance and protecting one's genetic privacy," said Derek Scholes, director of science policy at the American Society of Human Genetics, which represents human genetics specialists. The organization sent a letter to the committee opposing the bill.
They can go suck a monkey, for what I care.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
Why would employers do genetic testing?
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Martin75
I know right,
they wanted to make people give away their DNA for free and pay for giving it, but many people said hell not, so now they want it mandated.
They can go suck a monkey, for what I care.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
Why would employers do genetic testing?
originally posted by: 4N0M4LY
a reply to: MOMof3
A urine test isnt bad. Urine is simply bile from a human body and contains nothing interesting beyind what you ingested. It doesnt contain your entire family history and health ailments and who where your ancestors etc. Apples and oranges to me