It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Not only did it not happen, but more electors tried to defect from Hillary Clinton Monday than from Trump, by a count of eight to two. Three Democratic electors in Maine, Minnesota, and Colorado tried to vote for candidates other than Clinton. The electors' votes, however, were disallowed because of state rules binding them to the statewide popular vote winner.
Donald Trump Secures Electoral College Win, With Few Surprises
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: allsee4eye
Russia hasn't confirmed anything!
The article you linked conveniently offers no names of these so called Hillary "think tank" individuals, nor dates of any alleged meetings or events with Ambassador Kislyak
“Well, if you look at some people connected with Hillary Clinton during her campaign, you would probably see that he had lots of meetings of that kind,” Dmitry Peskov told CNN “GPS” host Fareed Zakaria. “There are lots of specialists in politology, people working in think tanks advising Hillary or advising people working for Hillary.”
Probably?
We've got names and dates of top Trump campaign advisors/cabinet members meeting with the Ambassador. This seems like another pretty lame attempt of the Kremlin trying to bail their boy Trumpy out....just like how WikiLeaks sprung into sve mode, conveniently releasing "Vault 7" after Trump's tweets accusing Obama "wiretapped" his personal phones put him on the spot! So transparent!
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: seasonal
The majority spoke and they voted for Hillary. Don't believe me? Look at the popular vote.
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: seasonal
The majority spoke and they voted for Hillary. Don't believe me? Look at the popular vote.
And thank god we don't go by the popular vote. Otherwise, it'd be majority rule coming from California and New York. A Democrat politicians wet dream...
Evidently nobody told the intelligence agencies to monitor Hillary's people.
I wonder why they only checked on Trumps?
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: rickymouse
Evidently nobody told the intelligence agencies to monitor Hillary's people.
What evidence brings you to "evidently"? I suppose if there were any kind of red flags, like with Trump's campaign, or if Hillary's people were acting suspiciously, like some of Trumpo's people were, then they would be being monitored too.
I wonder why they only checked on Trumps?
How do you know "they" were only looking at Trump's campaign? All we know is that Trump's campaign benefited from Russian interference, while many of Trump's people were quietly being very cozy with Russians, Trump called on Russia to "find" Hillary's emails and praised and fawned over Putin like a high school girl with a rock star crush.
In the meantime, Hillary was under investigation for her emails, the Clinton Foundation and "Benghazi" refused to go away. Hillary got no free ride.
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Gryphon66
56.5% to 42.2% of the electoral vote is not a thin margin. that's a full 15 points, double digits is not considered to be slim.
trump 304 electoral votes 56.5% percent clinton 227 electoral votes 42.2% percent.
or to put it another way she was 43 votes shy, he was 34 over, or he beat her by 77 electoral votes, that's certainly not a thin margin.