It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I am only arguing large jet strike at the pentagon. More intellectual dishonesty on your part.
Care to state what hit the pentagon. Or you just going to avoid the question.
Again. Want to talk about the truth movement and dustification, termite ceiling tiles, fuzzle no flash bombs and talk about explosions at the WTC with the same sentence , holograms and lasers, holograms and missiles, stolen missiles, or nuclear bombs. How about the insuring, maintenance, and building office buildings that are designed to self destruct.
What to talk about the cause of the WTC 7 collapse was already taken to court by the insurance companies to get out of the payout?
originally posted by: LaBTop
neutronflux : When talking about 757s, why mention any other jet design. Example of false logic.
Because they all use the same design : composite carbon fiber skin and internal aluminum wing spars covered by CF. And be my guest, find such wing stress tests online for a B-757-200 build before 1990.
And I gallantly took, to please the OS trusters here, just a moderate wing tip flex of 3 meters upwards at 825 KMH while trying to level off in dense air, just before allegedly hitting light pole 1 and 2.
Which is by far not the maximum flex possible at those immense wing loads, when coming out from even a shallow dive maneuver AT THAT SPEED in that dense air.
originally posted by: Informer1958
Typical Truth Movement rambling.
Most of the twisting of facts are from the leaders of the truth movement to stay relevant and financially afloat in the conspiracy marketplace. Sorry, you are a consumer of the truth movement. Not a truth hero.
Want to talk about nuke bombs, lasers and holograms, missiles and holograms, fizzle no flush bombs, thermite ceiling tiles, rebar covered in C-4. Dustification? Stolen saltwater damaged Russian Missiles? The impossibility a missile or cordite caused the damage at the pentagon?
It seems to me the only argument left for the OS supporters to desperately cling to and lump everyone who doesnt buy into the 911 OS fairy tail is, the Dead Truth movement and little to nothing else.
Yet we none believes of the OS are ridiculed that everything we say are nothing but tin foil ramblings.
Funny how that door swings both ways, Pot calling Kettle. Not to mention, it is also off topic.
The reports as follows:
Analysis of the Impact of a Fire in the Mechanical Room (5th & 6th Floor) of the World Trade Center 7 Building by Jose Torero.
World Trade Center 7 by Joseph P. Colaco (same file as above)
Response of WTC7 to Standard Office Fires and Collapse Initiation by Colin Bailey
Expert Report by Frederick Mowrer
Report and Summary of Findings: Global Collapse Analysis, World Trade Center 7 Investigation by Guy Nordenson (Report 1, Report 2)
What fairy tale are you talking about. Quote were I buy into every bit of the official narrative. I am just saying a large jet hit the pentagon. Your arguments cannot be substantiated, quantified, are intellectually dishonest, and are a straw man.
It's not my fault the product of the truth movement is more about target audience and consumerism than truth.
originally posted by: Informer1958
No one gives two cents about some dead truth movement but you. Your truth is only the OS of 911 and nothing else, your truth is full of holes, missing evidence, lack of investigation, hearsay, no videos of a plane crashing into the Pentagon, nada, nothing.
At Moussaoui Trial, Recalling Lives Stolen by 9/11
As jurors wiped away the occasional tear and Moussaoui watched impassively, a parade of victims and family members said the horror of the assaults on the World Trade Center and Pentagon...
D8Tee, can't you let go when proved wrong?
It's quite telling again, that you do not attack my overpass bridge situation drawing, nor its core figures.