It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LaBTop
You get all riled up when you start to honestly realize that something really stinks at the Pentagon :
And then ask yourselves just as honestly :
Do I oppose all these Official Stories doubting posts on this board because I am on some or any kind of government or military payroll, anywhere on Earth, and can't bring myself to honestly read and view, all these offered links, confronting officially released 9/11/2001 stories, since in that case, my whole world view, carefully build around me, shatters in thousand pieces.
Ask yourself just as honestly :
Or am I just on a quest to find minor flaws in offered posts, be they long stretched out, and filled to the rim with details and helpful links, by people you find actually despicable for any kind of reasons.?
Or am I using it as some kind of Trivia game, trying to outsmart online entities which seem to be smart enough to get that strange gut feeling that you must see them as an adversary, and thus a negative influence.?
Combativeness is nothing wrong with, however, the moment you loose that strictly neutral stance, open for critique from both sides of neutral, you are on a downwards spiraling course.
And everyone of us here have met such moments, and have to admit it's tough to get back to neutral, when confronted with not so thought-out and/or uncivil remarks.
Ask yourself then :
Where does that feeling come from ; could it be implemented by carefully chosen psychological operations by your paymasters, online and offline.? Through indoctrinating TV news sources, -TV advertising, -TV series and films, -false TV and false online news, -right news - but just a bit twisted news, etcetera. There is a huge influencing operation going on, for many decades already, based on evil psychological tactics that evolve at an increasingly pace.
Then conclude that :
It is in fact a good time to change your online behavior, open up for other views on 9/11/2001, while still maintaining a firm critical mind.
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: pale5218
Logic demands that if we are judging a story, a theory, a mystery to be examined, and if that story/mystery contains elements within forming the whole story, if any element of that whole story is false, then the entire story becomes false.
If one chooses to edit certain parts out of the whole story, so be it, but if the whole story is being judged, then the whole story must be true and accurate.
Sadly, many elements of the whole story regarding 911 and the pentagon are simply untrue, as they are contradicted by so many facts and evidence.
originally posted by: LaBTop
And then ask yourselves just as honestly :
Do I oppose all these Official Stories doubting posts on this board because I am on some or any kind of government or military payroll, anywhere on Earth, and can't bring myself to honestly read and view, all these offered links, confronting officially released 9/11/2001 stories, since in that case, my whole world view, carefully build around me, shatters in thousand pieces.
Ask yourself just as honestly :
Or am I just on a quest to find minor flaws in offered posts, be they long stretched out, and filled to the rim with details and helpful links, by people you find actually despicable for any kind of reasons.?
Where does that feeling come from ; could it be implemented by carefully chosen psychological operations by your paymasters, online and offline.? Through indoctrinating TV news sources, -TV advertising, -TV series and films, -false TV and false online news, -right news - but just a bit twisted news, etcetera. There is a huge influencing operation going on, for many decades already, based on evil psychological tactics that evolve at an increasingly pace.
Typical Truth Movement rambling.
Most of the twisting of facts are from the leaders of the truth movement to stay relevant and financially afloat in the conspiracy marketplace. Sorry, you are a consumer of the truth movement. Not a truth hero.
Want to talk about nuke bombs, lasers and holograms, missiles and holograms, fizzle no flush bombs, thermite ceiling tiles, rebar covered in C-4. Dustification? Stolen saltwater damaged Russian Missiles? The impossibility a missile or cordite caused the damage at the pentagon?
Originally posted by: Pilgrum
A reply to: LaBTop
You're relying on a select group of witnesses (cherry-picked perhaps) whose accounts could support the notorious NOC theory and it is a theory without physical evidence to support it. And yet there are quite a few witnesses who claim to have seen the plane hit the lamp poles so, without physical evidence, we could decide that the actual path is indeterminate as the accounts in relation to north/south create an impasse but we do know without doubt that the building was struck by the plane.
Enter the lamp poles which are the physical evidence of the actual path so I guess you'd need to come up with an elaborate story, as you have, to explain how that evidence came to be there. That story sounds like utter nonsense no matter how many times you spin it - was it magic?
A thought I had a while back - look into the time of day, it was during daylight saving btw, and the elevation/bearing of the sun in the DC sky at the time of impact that fateful day.
-- whose accounts could support the notorious NOC theory and it is a theory without physical evidence to support it.-- -- was it magic?
An update to Pilots For 9/11 Truth Arlington Topography and Obstacles Article. "G FORCES", a scene from the new film "9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON" produced by professional pilots, Aeronautical Engineers and physicists analyzes the G forces required for a 757 to negotiate the Arlington region on September 11, 2001 based on flight data provided by the US Govt.
originally posted by: neutronflux
originally posted by: LaBTop
And then ask yourselves just as honestly :
Do I oppose all these Official Stories doubting posts on this board because I am on some or any kind of government or military payroll, anywhere on Earth, and can't bring myself to honestly read and view, all these offered links, confronting officially released 9/11/2001 stories, since in that case, my whole world view, carefully build around me, shatters in thousand pieces.
Ask yourself just as honestly :
Or am I just on a quest to find minor flaws in offered posts, be they long stretched out, and filled to the rim with details and helpful links, by people you find actually despicable for any kind of reasons.?
Where does that feeling come from ; could it be implemented by carefully chosen psychological operations by your paymasters, online and offline.? Through indoctrinating TV news sources, -TV advertising, -TV series and films, -false TV and false online news, -right news - but just a bit twisted news, etcetera. There is a huge influencing operation going on, for many decades already, based on evil psychological tactics that evolve at an increasingly pace.
Typical Truth Movement rambling.
Who is on what payroll? Can you name names and provide proof. Typical truth movement implications of guilt through innuendo with no real target. Another straw man argument.
Cannot bring yourself to read what? Anything with a rational argument for flight 77 hitting the pentagon. But you drown yourself in biased truth movement YouTube channels and articles without reading opposing view points from rational individuals and debunking sites. Just look at your reference material. Most from YouTube by individuals held to no standard of credibility or any standard of research. Only goal is to provide a product to the truth movement consumer. Your logic is flawed. You need to muddle through debunking sites to challenge your view, to anticipate arguments, and test the validity of you referenced individuals and sources.
Most of your details are from only the truth movement with no effort on your part to test and research credibility, nor to verify facts. The truth movement is notorious for willfully taking evidence, quotes, and photos out of context and using only innuendo for proof. A truth movement that creates their own reality and hides key facts is not to be trusted. You should not enable the truth movement by giving into their desire for notoriety through their desperate search for a "smoking gun" more about YouTube likes than truth. The truth movement is out to keep a target audience, not about truth.
How about you and saying light poles were cut in half? You using ATS threads out of context? Starting to see a pattern.
I didn't realize there was large ad campaigns on 9/11. Sorry. Typical truth movement paranoia. I see government agents everywhere. They control everything. Everything is a lie.
I do not subscribe to pop culture, the whole official story, nor the truth movement. Avoid TV networks and main stream media. I used to take facts presented in these threads and research the crap out of them. Then found two patterns. One, most truth movement talking points have been debunked over and over again for the last 15 years. Two, most debunking evidence is bank. Debunkers seem to be more interested in reality, science, and credibility. Most truth movement evidence cannot be trusted, and must be research before use or you may be eating crow.
Most of the twisting of facts are from the leaders of the truth movement to stay relevant and financially afloat in the conspiracy marketplace. Sorry, you are a consumer of the truth movement. Not a truth hero.
Want to talk about nuke bombs, lasers and holograms, missiles and holograms, fizzle no flush bombs, thermite ceiling tiles, rebar covered in C-4. Dustification? Stolen saltwater damaged Russian Missiles? The impossibility a missile or cordite caused the damage at the pentagon?
I do find it ironic that members in the truth movement are now calling for rationality concerning large jet strike at the pentagon now deniers are hurting their gig pushing WTC CD. Follow the money?
Holy cow batman, that is the biased and false logic in a few of your paragraphs!