It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DupontDeux
originally posted by: pale5218
originally posted by: DupontDeux
originally posted by: pale5218
originally posted by: hiddenNZ
a reply to: Snarl
Now this is getting interesting
I'll throw something out there that might surprise you.
The GOFER06 flight was able to continue on his way after the Pentagon crash. It just so happens his route of flight took him northwest near through PA. He was asked by the Cleveland Center controllers to verify a reported crash area. He reported smoke over the crash site. UAL93 was the crash.
ETA This was a coincidence, I don't anyone going away with the idea there was something nefarious about this.
Are you serious, is that true...? ( Yes it is )
That is so 'convenient' that I actually believe this to be a coincidence - anyone planning a cover up would go "nah, nobody'll fall for that!" and decide to go with two different guys.
Still, though, the same Airforce officer used to lend credence to both crashes... I cannot that it does not make my conspiratorial heart beat a little faster!
He was quiet a ways from the site, I believe the distance was 25-30 miles away. Not part of the story other than a coincidence.
It was, according to the flight controller, 17 or 18 miles away, which yes, is quite a distance.
But the fact that he was the first one to confirm the Pentagon crash to flight control after they lost the plane on radar, and then went on to pass the Pennsylvania crash within 4 minutes after flight control lost THAT plane on radar .. and again was the first to report the crash to flight control .. that is just a mind boggling coincidence.
And the engines out of cardboard...12,000 lbs. of metal traveling over 400 mph hits a brick wall and there's no evidence??? No holes??? Naw....
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: DickBrisket
So , the Public was Made to Believe this Aircraft Made this Impact Hole in the Side of the Pentagon ? ...Hmm...
I Guess the Wings of this Aircraft were made out of Tissue Paper ?
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: DickBrisket
So , the Public was Made to Believe this Aircraft Made this Impact Hole in the Side of the Pentagon ? ...Hmm...
So where's the landing gear??? The back wall is still intact and a window is visible??? Where's that massive piece of metal that created the hole???
I Guess the Wings of this Aircraft were made out of Tissue Paper ?
That is a hole in the inner rings of the Pentagon where at least one of the landing gear went through. Landing gear are some of the heaviest and strongest parts of the airframe so one of them making it that far is not that shocking.
Those engines are 12,000 pounds of titanium blades...They didn't disintegrate...Should have been hundreds of turbine blades laying all over the place...
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: darkstar57
Those engines weigh 6 tons, but are mostly hollow, with a very small core. The thrust is irrelevant.
The tail height is on the ground with the gear down, but like most of the aircraft is hollow and fragile.
Driver Thinks Borgstrom Shot Down Flight 93 - One of the alert pilots, Major Brad Derrig, will later recall, “Confusion arose because Borgstrom had no missiles when he took off and that was noticed when he landed.” [9/11 Commission, 12/1/2003] The driver of a refueling truck, who is unaware that Borgstrom had taken off without any missiles, now notices that Borgstrom’s plane has no missiles hanging from its wings. According to author Lynn Spencer, the driver “knows that United 93 has gone down and now he surmises who took it down.” The following day, the driver will voice his suspicion to Borgstrom, and Borgstrom will clarify to him what actually happened. But, according to Spencer, “in the interim, a rumor is started that makes its way onto the Internet and will haunt the pilots for years to come,” that Flight 93 was shot down.
Link
Borgstrom joining them as a pilot will mean that, in the middle of this unprecedented crisis, their unit will be left without a commanding officer.
Because of my position as a ground equipment mechanic, I had access to the flightline operations that day. My friends were Crew Cheifs and Weapons Loaders, among other professions on the flightline that day. One of my [unusual] duties that day was to drive a Loader (personal friend) along with a rack of live missiles (AIM-9's and AIM-120's) across the active runway to the Alert Squadron and drop them off. I was towing equipment to the flightline, so when it was time to go back and pick up the Loader (and our missile trailer) I was unable to do so, but another member of my Flight (a good friend, and later roommate) did go. According to my roommate (and I later confirmed with the Loader) the Loader was completely silent most of the trip back to our side of the base, after they crossed the active, he spoke. "They shot one down." JJ replied "WHAT?" Loader:"One of those 16's came back with one less missile than it left with" That was all. As they pulled back in to the squadron area, The loader was whisked away by his commanders for debriefing. I didn't see him for a few days, but when I did, he said he couldn't talk about it, but he confirmed that what my roommate had told me was true.
Link
originally posted by: Iscool
Those engines are 12,000 pounds of titanium blades...They didn't disintegrate...Should have been hundreds of turbine blades laying all over the place...
originally posted by: hiddenNZ
a reply to: Zaphod58
Yeah anyone that's pulled apart a turbo would know that heavy parts are not conducive to spinning at 10s of thousands of rpm,they need to be lightweight so the unit doesn't self destruct under differing air pressure changes. Central shaft with vanes and a housing to direct the airflow.