It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: pale5218
Interesting thread. S&Fs.
I didn't see it discussed but I wondered why there is an overlap of what seems like two aircraft just as Flight 77 does the 360° turn towards the Pentagon?
That's the only moment I saw anything like that and noticed it was in the second similar video you posted, too:
If you already explained this, forgive my asking....this is all very technical and new to my eyes.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: pale5218
Interesting thread. S&Fs.
I didn't see it discussed but I wondered why there is an overlap of what seems like two aircraft just as Flight 77 does the 360° turn towards the Pentagon?
That's the only moment I saw anything like that and noticed it was in the second similar video you posted, too:
If you already explained this, forgive my asking....this is all very technical and new to my eyes.
originally posted by: pale5218
originally posted by: facedye
a reply to: pale5218
here's what I'm getting from your reply:
- the pilot saw the plane hit the pentagon but didn't see it take down 5 light poles. this means you still have to resolve the problem of what happened to those poles if you are to believe a 757 did it. if a 757 did not down those poles, what did? eyewitness reports state that the object that hit the pentagon also took those poles down. this is a huge issue.
- if you have no clue what the angle was, how do you know from which direction it was coming from? all of the information from official reports, when corroborated with one another, contradicts itself just like those two snapshots I posted. this is also a massive issue.
- the speed of the craft, again, based on all official reports available, was ~530 mph before impact. what this tells me is that the information you're referencing and citing is entirely incomplete, and non-inclusive of all available data.
I have no idea why this reconciles anything for you. it just adds more fuel to the fire.
the pilot reported seeing the aircraft in a descent on a flight path into the Pentagon. If you look at the video and see where the C130 was when the B757 hit, I would say 7-8 miles in trail. That being said, easy to see an airplane, easy to see it hit the building at this distance. What would not have been AS easy to see is the plane hitting the light poles.
The other thing is, who said he didn't see the poles get taken down. Maybe he never mentioned it because he didn't think it was a needed detail. Is there anywhere the this pilot actually says he DIDN'T see them taken out? I don't know if I have seen or heard this.
did you watch the video because you can see what direction it comes from, clear without a doubt. The angle is not known because you have to see how the building is situated. I mean are you asking descent angle? lateral angle?
The angle isn't needed from what I described the direction is clear.
I am stating what I see on the radar, 370knots across the ground.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: pale5218
Ha...you'll have to give this to me in more basic language.
originally posted by: facedye
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
yeah, you definitely missed it. there's only one "I don't know" that you've gotten from me, and that's in reference to where the few pieces of supposed wreckage came from.
and unfortunately those photos that you're referring to don't prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that flight 77 crashed into the pentagon. why? because the nature of those photos, the 9/11 commission report, the NTSB, and the official pentagon report gives any common-sense adult the feeling that something's not quite right about this "plane crash."
originally posted by: Unthought Known
I know there are a billion 9/11 threads on this site, including this one, but I am curious. Has anyone ever seen pics of the light poles right in front to see if a few were taking out by the wings? Looks like the plane would have had to hit them as low as it was where it hit the pentagon.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: pale5218
If the radar is a secondary set, which a surprising number of FAA control centers are, turning the transponder off makes the plane completely disappear from radar altogether.