It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: pale5218
originally posted by: DupontDeux
originally posted by: pale5218
originally posted by: hiddenNZ
a reply to: Snarl
Now this is getting interesting
I'll throw something out there that might surprise you.
The GOFER06 flight was able to continue on his way after the Pentagon crash. It just so happens his route of flight took him northwest near through PA. He was asked by the Cleveland Center controllers to verify a reported crash area. He reported smoke over the crash site. UAL93 was the crash.
ETA This was a coincidence, I don't anyone going away with the idea there was something nefarious about this.
Are you serious, is that true...? ( Yes it is )
That is so 'convenient' that I actually believe this to be a coincidence - anyone planning a cover up would go "nah, nobody'll fall for that!" and decide to go with two different guys.
Still, though, the same Airforce officer used to lend credence to both crashes... I cannot that it does not make my conspiratorial heart beat a little faster!
He was quiet a ways from the site, I believe the distance was 25-30 miles away. Not part of the story other than a coincidence.
originally posted by: JanetteDoeDoe
a reply to: pale5218
Great thread and information, thanks!
Personally I think missiles but this is still some good information. At the end of the day if it's plane or missile, does it really matter? I think the more important question is, real or false flag?
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: hiddenNZ
The aluminum used in aircraft has a stronger tensile strength than a lot of steel. And it hit the wall like a battering ram.
I look at the logistics side of this. If it was a missile then an airplane with a good number of passengers are missing. What kind of missile would it have been and fired from where? This would not have been an air to air missile. Where did the 757 parts come from like the gear and turbine pieces? A C-130 followed a plane that disappeared, if not into the Pentagon then where did it go? There are zero eyewitnesses that say they saw a missile in the air...
A whole bunch of witnesses that saw a plane hit, one guy whose truck was near by had aircraft rivets embedded in it. Here is a good list of reports...
Pentagon Eyewitnesses
originally posted by: DupontDeux
originally posted by: pale5218
originally posted by: DupontDeux
originally posted by: pale5218
originally posted by: hiddenNZ
a reply to: Snarl
Now this is getting interesting
I'll throw something out there that might surprise you.
The GOFER06 flight was able to continue on his way after the Pentagon crash. It just so happens his route of flight took him northwest near through PA. He was asked by the Cleveland Center controllers to verify a reported crash area. He reported smoke over the crash site. UAL93 was the crash.
ETA This was a coincidence, I don't anyone going away with the idea there was something nefarious about this.
Are you serious, is that true...? ( Yes it is )
That is so 'convenient' that I actually believe this to be a coincidence - anyone planning a cover up would go "nah, nobody'll fall for that!" and decide to go with two different guys.
Still, though, the same Airforce officer used to lend credence to both crashes... I cannot that it does not make my conspiratorial heart beat a little faster!
He was quiet a ways from the site, I believe the distance was 25-30 miles away. Not part of the story other than a coincidence.
It was, according to the flight controller, 17 or 18 miles away, which yes, is quite a distance.
But the fact that he was the first one to confirm the Pentagon crash to flight control after they lost the plane on radar, and then went on to pass the Pennsylvania crash within 4 minutes after flight control lost THAT plane on radar .. and again was the first to report the crash to flight control .. that is just a mind boggling coincidence.
I always chuckle at the folks that point to unbroken windows...
The leadership has been known to look at all possible threats, and rank them. The lower the threat, the less attention it gets. Getting attacked by hijacked airliners that changed or deactivated their transponder was somewhere way down the list, so it got the attention the Pentagon felt it deserved, which boiled down to almost none.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: facedye
Yes we did, and it doesn't change the fact that the E-4B is a command post, not an AWACS, or that the Alert Force wasn't involved in any exercise. And there were plenty of aircraft they could have called on if they wanted to launch unarmed aircraft that weren't involved in the exercises. As for the E-4s, they are designed to take over for NORAD, or one of the other command posts if they're knocked out or lose communications. That's why the tertiary aircraft landed long before the others. It wasn't needed.
The problem that day was that they were looking for aircraft that didn't want to be found, and had to use FAA radar. If there had been an E-3 in the area, I'll almost guarantee they would have found them. Using FAA radar, they were half blind with a hand behind their back.