It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Black_Fox
(Yahoo.com)-A little-noticed bill moving through Congress would allow companies to require employees to undergo genetic testing or risk paying a penalty of thousands of dollars, and would let employers see that genetic and other health information.
Giving employers such power is now prohibited by legislation including the 2008 genetic privacy and nondiscrimination law known as GINA. The new bill gets around that landmark law by stating explicitly that GINA and other protections do not apply when genetic tests are part of a “workplace wellness” program
www.yahoo.com...
I cant see this being a good idea, but yet, still see a line of morons lining up to go along with it.
I'd like to think this would be considered an invasion of privacy, but then again, if you don't do this, would you be allowed to have a job?
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
Gattaca here we come.
First the ACA replacement that essentially makes it impossible for poor people to get insurance and now this bill. Are we sure that the GOP aren't trying to introduce a eugenics program?
GINA and other protections do not apply when genetic tests are part of a “workplace wellness” program
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: TamtammyMacx
Also, if pre-existing conditions aren't supposed to preclude you, why test? Just like the 23 and me and the Ancestry.com, it feels kind of like they are looking for something. Creepy.
originally posted by: sdcigarpig
My question after reading and hearing about this is the following:
Where are all of the evangelical christian out there that cry if something offends them? Why would they willingly accept this, only to denouce the idea of being chipped? Do they not realize that this would lead to chipping of people?
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: TamtammyMacx
And when it does pass, what will anyone ***really*** do about it? Bitch on social media? How much is enough? The tech noose is tightening.
Also, if pre-existing conditions aren't supposed to preclude you, why test? Just like the 23 and me and the Ancestry.com, it feels kind of like they are looking for something. Creepy.
The Council represents Fortune 500 companies and other large employers that provide employee benefits. It did not immediately respond to questions about how lack of access to genetic information hampers wellness programs.
Rigorous studies by researchers not tied to the $8 billion wellness industry have shown that the programs improve employee health little if at all.
An industry group recently concluded that they save so little on medical costs that, on average, the programs lose money. But employers continue to embrace them, partly as a way to shift more health care costs to workers, including by penalizing them financially.