It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I find it interesting that all of your ideas (which do sound practical) are beyond the ability of individuals to implement. The only people who have the power to implement them are those who are crying for taxation and doing nothing else.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: interupt42
I find it interesting that all of your ideas (which do sound practical) are beyond the ability of individuals to implement. The only people who have the power to implement them are those who are crying for taxation and doing nothing else.
Personally, I hate the cold. Al Gore promised me Global Warming, and I expect him to follow through!
TheRedneck
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: interupt42
Personally, I simply do not believe the hype, but even if I did, I would expect more from our leaders than a tax. I would expect them to embrace CO2 scrubber technology instead of ignoring (or defunding and burying) it. I would expect them to consider plans to use plant life to absorb the extra carbon dioxide instead of pooh-poohing it. I would expect them to open the floodgates for research into alternate energy development instead of pouring all the cash into trying to 'prove' Global Warming exists. I would expect them to lead by example, not by demands and mandates.
Hypocrisy, thy name is Anthropogenic Global Warming.
TheRedneck
One way to reduce energy use dramatically is converting to LED lighting.
Despite being told repeatedly that the science is settled on AGW, no one on the side of AGW can actually explain the casual efficacy that we have over our planet.
So, let's pretend that Anthropogenic Global Warming is a thing for a moment. I have a question for all of you true believers out there...what do you propose to do about it? What do you want ME to do about it?
Humans are putting a big chunk of that carbon right back into the atmosphere in a few centuries. It is simply not credible that that cannot have a detrimental effect on all life on the planet.
And one person moving to LED probably has orders of magnitude more impact than some vague tax that will be spent on vague things based on a premise not everyone agrees on.
It is impossible to roll back the damage, and it is too late to prevent a lot of damage. That CO2 will stay in the atmosphere for a LOOOOOONNNNNNGGGGGG time.
The C02 fertilization effect is leading to increased biomass on planet earth
, crop yields are up.
Amongst the benefits of global warming include: fewer winter deaths;
better agricultural yields;
probably fewer droughts;
maybe richer biodiversity.
It is a little-known fact that winter deaths exceed summer deaths
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: rnaa
Humans are putting a big chunk of that carbon right back into the atmosphere in a few centuries. It is simply not credible that that cannot have a detrimental effect on all life on the planet.
It's not all detrimental, stop being so alarmist.
The C02 fertilization effect is leading to increased biomass on planet earth, crop yields are up.
Amongst the benefits of global warming include: fewer winter deaths; better agricultural yields; probably fewer droughts; maybe richer biodiversity. It is a little-known fact that winter deaths exceed summer deaths