It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
LeftBehind: Do they help or impede in a dogfight? Does their weight restrict payload or manueverability, or is it negligable?
rogue1: The only real problem with VTOL is the weapons load which can be carried. ONly a few AAM's can be carried with a VTOL takeoff. Sure they can carry more with using a short take off, but that isn't true VTOL.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
I see so the only drawbacks to a SVTOL or VTOL system seem to be the high heat signature. The smaller payload doesnt seem like much of a downside, especially for US planes who would have immense support.
Now with that said, does the high heat make it harder to make the plane stealthy, or do the stealth VTOL/SVTOL planes not use the system in flight?
Also in the next 25 years or so should we expect to see all the new fighter jets equipped with this style system or will it stay on as more of a niche of fighters for specialized roles, like in the marines?
Originally posted by LeftBehind
That's interesting devilwasp. So do you think that fighter pilots are a dying breed, and soon our air force will be replaced with remote control or maybe even autonomous unmanned craft?
Originally posted by devilwasp
Well anyone with IR goggles would see you for quite a distance and IR missiles would have a field day.
Originally posted by rogue1
Originally posted by devilwasp
Well anyone with IR goggles would see you for quite a distance and IR missiles would have a field day.
Well, if you're that close to a runway, it wouldn't make any difference what aircraft is taking off, there is still going to be a large heat signature. Once airbourne though the heat signature would be no different than any other aircraft flying around - probably less with the newer engine.
Originally posted by Broadsword20068
Pilots are NOT a dying breed, as there are still too many complexities to unmanned aircraft that a pilot overcomes.
Originally posted by intelgurl
The F-35B is not a VTOL (vertical takeoff, landing) aircraft but rather a STOVL (short takeoff, vertical landing).
Originally posted by rogue1
Well, if you're that close to a runway, it wouldn't make any difference what aircraft is taking off, there is still going to be a large heat signature. Once airbourne though the heat signature would be no different than any other aircraft flying around - probably less with the newer engine.
Originally posted by spacemunkey
When the Harriers hover, they inject water into the engine to cool it down because it overheats so quickly. It can only hover for about 30secs/or when the water runs out, maximum.
Originally posted by longbow
Originally posted by intelgurl
The F-35B is not a VTOL (vertical takeoff, landing) aircraft but rather a STOVL (short takeoff, vertical landing).
Hmmm. But I saw a video of JSF taking off vertically, so I think it is VTOL plane. Maybe it cannot take off vertically with full JDAMs payload, but 6 Amraams(+/-1000kg) should not be a problem, or not?