Obama admin sabotaged Trump by spreading revealing classified info to European allies

There are many questions about rather or not anyone on Trumps team was surveilled, and what role Obama played in that.

This is clearly a huge issue, as you can tell from peoples reaction to Trumps tweet. Many are saying the suggestion that Obama would have tapped Trump is such a big deal that Trump should be punished if its false because its such a horrible thing to accuse Obama of. So clearly if Obama did do anything of the sort, it would be terrible.

The reason that it would be terrible is because it raises questions of rather or not Obama used agencies to spy on a political opponent. NBow some may say Obama or his admin would have had reason to do this because of potential illegal actions by Trump. OK got that.

But again, I think it is evidenced by peoples response to Trumps Tweet that if the outgoing President was trying to spy on his opponent for political benefit, or to sabotage Trumps presidency would be a terrible thing to do.

OK, now that we have established that, I present this article. Its long and so I will just post the relevant paragraphs, but I encourage everyone to read it.

In the Obama administration’s last days, some White House officials scrambled to spread information about Russian efforts to undermine the presidential election — and about possible contacts between associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump and Russians — across the government. Former American officials say they had two aims: to ensure that such meddling isn’t duplicated in future American or European elections, and to leave a clear trail of intelligence for government investigators.

...

At intelligence agencies, there was a push to process as much raw intelligence as possible into analyses, and to keep the reports at a relatively low classification level to ensure as wide a readership as possible across the government — and, in some cases, among European allies. This allowed the upload of as much intelligence as possible to Intellipedia, a secret wiki used by American analysts to share information.

www.nytimes.com...

This is unbelievable!!!!

Now keep in mind, the director of national intelligence James Clapper at the time just said yesterday that they have not seen any evidence that Trump did any wrong doing.

This means that the Obama admin had zero evidence that Trump had done anything wrong, and yet they were sharing results of a classified investigation to European allies saying Trump may be involved in illegal activities with the Russians!

This goes beyond the Obama admin just wanting to get to the bottom of an investigation. This is active sabotage of a Trump presidency!
The only reason to do this was to make Trump look bad with European allies.

Keep in mind, Clapper admitted that at the time Obamas admin was telling these european allies this, they had no evidence that Trump did anything wrong!

For me, this is enough to show the unethical behavior of the Obama admin. Can you imagine if W. Bush had gone to all of our European allies and told them Obama was compromised by Hamas or the Muslim brotherhood. There would have been calls for jail time for Bush!

But Obama gets away with this act of political sabotage.

No matter what your feelings on Trump, anyone American that believes in free elections ought to be oiutraged at the behaviour of the Obama admin and demand repercussions for their actions.

All coming out in the wash.

Falling down, going BOOM

Everyone should be outraged, but some of the population are distracted by social issues and have been brainwashed into thinking Trump stands for all they claim to hate.
Claims they mostly make on social media.

If they really cared about anybody but themselves, they would care about this.

Obama isn't a friend to the U.S., never has been, never will be. He worked for the Euro elite, it's no surprise he would be giving them info.

a reply to: Grambler

You encourage everyone to read it? Where's the link?

a reply to: Grambler

Obama didn't order any specific spying, the intelligence agencies did that on their own, as part of national security. Alleging that Obama was spying on Trump specifically for personal gain is basically making the Watergate allegations. That's a pretty serious crime to accuse someone of, and Trump is the guy who is all about suing for libel and slander. If those claims are false, he should be taken to court.

a reply to: Aazadan

Obama cannot deny knowledge. No plausible deniabilty this time.

Snowden made it very public and Obama did nothing to stop it.

Obama did not pardon Snowden, of course.

Obama owns it.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Grambler

You encourage everyone to read it? Where's the link?

Thanks for the heads up I added it.

originally posted by: Grambler
There are many questions about rather or not anyone on Trumps team was surveilled, and what role Obama played in that.

There actually aren't questions. Nor facts. Nor even anything that could pass as questionable innuendo.

is this the mandela effect or did we go over this already?

originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: Grambler

Obama didn't order any specific spying, the intelligence agencies did that on their own, as part of national security. Alleging that Obama was spying on Trump specifically for personal gain is basically making the Watergate allegations. That's a pretty serious crime to accuse someone of, and Trump is the guy who is all about suing for libel and slander. If those claims are false, he should be taken to court.

First, even if Obama didn't order the spying, he did sign the EO which allowed the info to be easier shared between agencies.

And it was his admin that shared this info with the europeans.

So much for "the buck stops here" though right? No doubt this will be the excuse. I guess Obamas people went rogue, sharing this info with allies with ZERO evidence of Trump doing anything wrong, and Obama had no clue this was going on.

This is a joke! It was his administration, he is responsible, and he and his people should be held accountable!

originally posted by: syrinx high priest
is this the mandela effect or did we go over this already?

Deja Vu, really!

a reply to: Grambler

Just tagging your thread to watch ...Oh and just as the original tweet thread has spun off other threads like this one we can expect the investigation on the 20th will create other investigations would be my bet...carry on

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Grambler
There are many questions about rather or not anyone on Trumps team was surveilled, and what role Obama played in that.

There actually aren't questions. Nor facts. Nor even anything that could pass as questionable innuendo.

So you have nothing to add.

I am glad you are ok with an administration passing off classified info to smear a political opponent knowing that they have no evidence of wrong doing.

Weren't you one of the ones that thought Trump would be a fascist? yet you have no problem with Obamas admin doing this fascist behavior?

Keep on joking, you look so unbiased.

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: Grambler

Obama didn't order any specific spying, the intelligence agencies did that on their own, as part of national security. Alleging that Obama was spying on Trump specifically for personal gain is basically making the Watergate allegations. That's a pretty serious crime to accuse someone of, and Trump is the guy who is all about suing for libel and slander. If those claims are false, he should be taken to court.

First, even if Obama didn't order the spying, he did sign the EO which allowed the info to be easier shared between agencies.

And it was his admin that shared this info with the europeans.

So much for "the buck stops here" though right? No doubt this will be the excuse. I guess Obamas people went rogue, sharing this info with allies with ZERO evidence of Trump doing anything wrong, and Obama had no clue this was going on.

This is a joke! It was his administration, he is responsible, and he and his people should be held accountable!

Are you sure there's zero evidence of wrongdoing? Clearly, if information was being shared, it means they had something worth sharing right?

And if I remember correctly, the EO's on sharing information go back to W. Obama didn't stop them, but he didn't create them either. Trump won't stop them either.

This is as real as Trump saying he was 'tapped'. Yes, he is tapped on ideas to deflect. He was also mad at Sessions' press conference stealing his thunder on #stupidgate.

a reply to: Grambler

Is obvious for those that wants to see the Truth that it was a rabid assault on Trump during the campaign, no only that but they try to pursue a character assassination like no other.

The chain of evens behind the wiretapping, the DNC hacking and the Russian links it all makes sense now.

CIA is all over the DNC hacking.

Wikileaks is an eye opener to the capabilities of this corrupted and gone rouge under the Obama former administration agencies under the direction of huntsman like Bremen.

Is a reason why Obama appointed the people he appointed in key places within the agencies.

The CIA was very happy to go after Trump on an all out war.

For years we have been warned I remember this article as far back as 2008

Exposing Pentagon and CIA Corruption

www.counterpunch.org...

Year after year revelations warnings and why are we no listening, because the spying agencies makes sure that we are call conspiracy theorist and until recently we were a danger to national security, people that like to expose the truth are call also wakos.

originally posted by: reldra
This is as real as Trump saying he was 'tapped'. Yes, he is tapped on ideas to deflect. He was also mad at Sessions' press conference stealing his thunder on #stupidgate.

So you are saying the New York Times article is a lie? What part is a lie? The part about Obama asking the agencies to share the info with each other? Or the fact that the admin shared info with European allies?

Could you please post links as to why you think this is not true?

And also, why would the New York times completely fabricate this story?

Please share you info with us, I am sure you have great sources to back up your powerful claims that this is not true.

a reply to: Grambler

At dinner this evening I proposed a similar theory to your OP.

Clearly Obama made his executive order allowing the NSA to share their data with the other 16 intelligence agencies in order to cover his ass when this wiretap scandal came to light.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Grambler

Is obvious for those that wants to see the Truth that it was a rabid assault on Trump during the campaign, no only that but they try to pursue a character assassination like no other.

I guess only the enlightened ones, like you.

Trump's character assassinates itself. No one even has to say anything.

This is too easy.