It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
so people complain that trump alledgedly doesnt read books
then complain that bannon does
priceless
originally posted by: Snarl
I literally fell asleep reading the OP.
If this wasn't the Mud Pit ... I wouldn't have a comment.
originally posted by: RomeByFire
OP gets a 0/10.
Not enough mank demes.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
so people complain that trump alledgedly doesnt read books
then complain that bannon does
priceless
originally posted by: kosmicjack
You can literally look at the guy and see he is not balanced. He may well be brilliant but that doesn't mean he's healthy or functional. Add to it his actual opinions/editorials and it's a disturbing situation. What I don't get is why everyone tiptoes around the idea that Trump is under the influence of a very dodgy dude. All this pandering to Trumps outrageous claims and inept policies is giving me an ulcer. It's like the media is enjoying the feeding frenzy rather than actually doing their job. I do not give 2 #s what Trump tweets but I do care who is pulling his strings.
You can literally look at the guy and see he is not balanced. He may well be brilliant but that doesn't mean he's healthy or functional. Add to it his actual opinions/editorials and it's a disturbing situation. What I don't get is why everyone tiptoes around the idea that Trump is under the influence of a very dodgy dude. All this pandering to Trumps outrageous claims and inept policies is giving me an ulcer. It's like the media is enjoying the feeding frenzy rather than actually doing their job. I do not give 2 #s what Trump tweets but I do care who is pulling his strings.
If he was a true leader, he wouldn't get his Tweet talking points from cable news programs.
originally posted by: ketsuko
But wait ... when Anita Dunn called Mao her favorite political philosopher implying she had read the little red book, this was no big deal. But when Bannon cites a similarly controversial work, it means he has morphed into the Anti-Christ or Hitler?
Would that mean that if I were to say I have read Marx and Alinsky, despite my many times stated views here, people would now start calling me an evil socialist commie?