It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is Lynch About To Go Down ?

page: 5
64
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

you know what go ahead ignore me another tactic of yours wont hear any other opinion than your own and then try and tell me i'm triggered for your fascist remark you are the lowest of the low




posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:13 AM
link   
encyclopedia


Wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping are two types of electronic surveillance that play vital roles in criminal investigations. Wiretapping involves the use of covert means to intercept, monitor, and record telephone conversations of individuals. Electronic eavesdropping may involve the placement of a "bug" inside private premises to secretly record conversations, or the use of a "wired" government informant to record conversations that occur within the informant's earshot. Both wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping enable the government to monitor and record conversations and activities without revealing the presence of government listening devices.


Just add a little clarity to the semantics argument.

Wiretapping is part of surveillance...the fact trump used the term wire tap is irrelevant to the topic, since it is a tool regularly used in surveillance, and the FISA warrant requests stated surveillance.
edit on 6-3-2017 by Irishhaf because: (no reason given)

edit on 6-3-2017 by Irishhaf because: (no reason given)

edit on 6-3-2017 by Irishhaf because: (no reason given)

edit on 6-3-2017 by Irishhaf because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Do you measure your ignore time in microseconds?

Of course you have a source that proves trump is "lying through his teeth"? If so please be so kind as to provide it.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: coldlikecustard
a reply to: Krazysh0t

you know what go ahead ignore me another tactic of yours wont hear any other opinion than your own and then try and tell me i'm triggered for your fascist remark you are the lowest of the low

I've been talking to you for several hours now. If you think I haven't heard you then you are a fool. You are the one who became unhinged and yelled fascist at me because I said that your questions aren't proof of anything (clearly demonstrating that you didn't bother to attempt to understand my point).

So stop whining and get back on topic.
edit on 6-3-2017 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Do you measure your ignore time in microseconds?

Of course you have a source that proves trump is "lying through his teeth"? If so please be so kind as to provide it.

How about you prove Trump's claim first? Because that is how you prove things.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
Well, you certainly have a reputation, that much is true!


originally posted by: shooterbrody

You posted of your level of confidence and now it is off topic? And your past history of confidence is ad hominem now?

Yeah probly better for you to ignore those who actually read what you post.

Ad hominems and deflections. Proof that you don't have an argument left. Figures since Trump is lying through his teeth here and you guys are just lashing out at me because you know you can't prove this craziness.


Ad homs? Where??

I was talking of your sterling reputation as an unbiased, level-headed factophile of course!! Lions and tigers and bears, oh my!



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

What's with this "IF"? This claim is straight from Trump's nether region. I can't believe we are entertaining it like it is a possibility.


Lucky for you, this is an absolute. It is either true, or false. If it's true, the left is going to be blown into tiny bits with pieces of Obama splattering you in the face, if it's false, same thing, other side and Trump bits and pieces. So either way,
truth and facts will prevail. But to dismiss this out of hand is idiotic and the sign of a scared little boy. Don't be that scared little boy.

I'm willing to let my reputation ride on this. That is how sure I am that Trump is just manufacturing a scandal here. That's not fear. That's confidence.


Lucky for us, you are willing to put your reputation on the line here. Should this pan out and Trump be right, the level of laughter and ridicule you will be subjected to is mind boggling. I went from not sure about this to really, really wanting it to be true, just for that one reason alone. To see the personification of arrogance smashed, oh happy day.

And you guys wonder why liberals hate Trump supporters so much...

Well. I'll be looking forward to rubbing it in your face when I'm shown to be right; I'll make a special point of it too since you told me all this.


Yes, please do rub in my face that I suggested to wait for facts. I look forward to that level of ridicule.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:28 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

You really are messed up it was you who said you were going to ignore me look back through the thread for the evidence then you tell me not to ask questions about this who the hell do you think you are i will ask what i like when i like and if you dont like that then that makes you a fascist you dont have to agree with me but you damn sure can not tell me not to question



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Do you measure your ignore time in microseconds?

Of course you have a source that proves trump is "lying through his teeth"? If so please be so kind as to provide it.

How about you prove Trump's claim first? Because that is how you prove things.


You already know the request was granted, any further proof of surveillance actually being carried out would be something subject to confidentiality I would assume, so you are asking for something that, wait for it...

only Trump and a handful of other people would have access to.

Do you know how ridiculous that is?



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Do you measure your ignore time in microseconds?

Of course you have a source that proves trump is "lying through his teeth"? If so please be so kind as to provide it.

How about you prove Trump's claim first? Because that is how you prove things.


You already know the request was granted, any further proof of surveillance actually being carried out would be something subject to confidentiality I would assume, so you are asking for something that, wait for it...

only Trump and a handful of other people would have access to.

Do you know how ridiculous that is?

Well when is Trump going to produce this evidence? It has now been two days since his idiotic accusation. Where is the evidence? Why aren't you demanding he produce it in short order? These are very serious claims he is making. We need to see all the evidence immediately.
edit on 6-3-2017 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

So you have no source that proves that trump is "lying through his teeth".

Several sitting us representatives stated this past weekend this issue will be investigated including Burr and Nunes. So apparently the potus' statement was enough to have the proper people look into the situation.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

What's with this "IF"? This claim is straight from Trump's nether region. I can't believe we are entertaining it like it is a possibility.


Lucky for you, this is an absolute. It is either true, or false. If it's true, the left is going to be blown into tiny bits with pieces of Obama splattering you in the face, if it's false, same thing, other side and Trump bits and pieces. So either way,
truth and facts will prevail. But to dismiss this out of hand is idiotic and the sign of a scared little boy. Don't be that scared little boy.

I'm willing to let my reputation ride on this. That is how sure I am that Trump is just manufacturing a scandal here. That's not fear. That's confidence.


Lucky for us, you are willing to put your reputation on the line here. Should this pan out and Trump be right, the level of laughter and ridicule you will be subjected to is mind boggling. I went from not sure about this to really, really wanting it to be true, just for that one reason alone. To see the personification of arrogance smashed, oh happy day.

And you guys wonder why liberals hate Trump supporters so much...

Well. I'll be looking forward to rubbing it in your face when I'm shown to be right; I'll make a special point of it too since you told me all this.


Yes, please do rub in my face that I suggested to wait for facts. I look forward to that level of ridicule.


Quite...

I don't think (m)any of us are saying that Trump is correct, but that common sense dictates he would not have said this for NO REASON AT ALL. The idea that this is a distraction from Russia ties, I just can't get my head around that.

This is the current party line - Trump has no proof that he was being surveilled, that this is all distraction from his ties to Russia, however we do have evidence that he is colluding with Russia, but we definitely got that without him being surveilled???

How does anyone maintain this circular logic without going dizzy??
edit on 6-3-2017 by Dem0nc1eaner because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Krazysh0t

So you have no source that proves that trump is "lying through his teeth".

Several sitting us representatives stated this past weekend this issue will be investigated including Burr and Nunes. So apparently the potus' statement was enough to have the proper people look into the situation.


So? He's still lying through his teeth and this is a distraction from his Russia problems.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Do you measure your ignore time in microseconds?

Of course you have a source that proves trump is "lying through his teeth"? If so please be so kind as to provide it.

How about you prove Trump's claim first? Because that is how you prove things.


You already know the request was granted, any further proof of surveillance actually being carried out would be something subject to confidentiality I would assume, so you are asking for something that, wait for it...

only Trump and a handful of other people would have access to.

Do you know how ridiculous that is?

Well when is Trump going to produce this evidence? It has now been two days since his idiotic accusation. Where is the evidence? Why aren't you demanding he produce it in short order? These are very serious claims he is making. We need to see all the evidence immediately.


So, 2 days is long enough to build a case against an ex-president surveilling a current one in order to try and subvert an election?

Would releasing the evidence, if it exists, be a smart move with regards to any future court proceedings?

What the hell man?



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

You have any source for this?
Of course not this is merely your opinion.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Do you measure your ignore time in microseconds?

Of course you have a source that proves trump is "lying through his teeth"? If so please be so kind as to provide it.

How about you prove Trump's claim first? Because that is how you prove things.


You already know the request was granted, any further proof of surveillance actually being carried out would be something subject to confidentiality I would assume, so you are asking for something that, wait for it...

only Trump and a handful of other people would have access to.

Do you know how ridiculous that is?

Well when is Trump going to produce this evidence? It has now been two days since his idiotic accusation. Where is the evidence? Why aren't you demanding he produce it in short order? These are very serious claims he is making. We need to see all the evidence immediately.


So, 2 days is long enough to build a case against an ex-president surveilling a current one in order to try and subvert an election?

It's apparently long enough to make grandiose claims about an ex-President. I'd think that if he is making a claim of the gravity that he is making, he'd have some evidence to support this accusation that he could present.


Would releasing the evidence, if it exists, be a smart move with regards to any future court proceedings?

What the hell man?

It would give credibility to his claims for further investigation at the least. I know that all you need is Trump to say something and you'll believe it like gospel, but others care about facts and evidence before we commit these things.
edit on 6-3-2017 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Krazysh0t

You have any source for this?
Of course not this is merely your opinion.

Yet that is the best reasoning you have to try to continue this waste of time investigation. Produce some evidence of your claims. The onus isn't on me to prove a negative.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Nancy? is that you?



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
You guys are too much. Y'all spend all day deriding the media for "fake news" and shoddy reporting and Trump literally TWEETS a very serious accusation about a former US President and suddenly his masses not only accept these accusations at face value, but start manufacturing and piecing together unrelated evidence to "prove" it true. You guys should be ashamed of what you are doing to "truth".

Well lets not forget Trump is the President of the United States, whether you like it or not his word holds weight for a lot of people regardless of what format it was delivered in. What I don't understand is why you have so much faith in corporations, because that's what the MSM is. Most people understand the fact you can't always trust what the package says because corporations are often manipulative, yet they fail to apply that same logic to the MSM. That's not to say the government is any better, but it seems mighty hypocritical of you to talk about truth when there's no evidence of any of the absurd Russian claims which you have apparently accepted at face value.



posted on Mar, 6 2017 @ 10:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: coldlikecustard
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Nancy? is that you?


Is that all your party has is stupid insults that aren't even clever? I mean, if you can't formulate a legitimate argument or provide any proof (in which, you can't regarding the claims) at least make a witty comment we can all laugh at.

Trump supporters are cuckoo for an alternative reality.

"We don't need proof, we have Tweeeeter!"

Which is amusing as all Hell considering anything to the contrary is considered fake news lol.

I truly cannot wrap my mind around the logical inconsistencies that is a Trump supporter.



new topics

top topics



 
64
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join